On 06/25/07 04:04:06PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 03:28:09PM +0800, Ye Fei wrote:
> >
> > I installed the linux-source-2.6.21 by "apt-get install", and built
> > the
> > linux-image for my laptop ibm-X32 with
> > "suspend2-2.2.10-for-2.6.21.1.patch" patched, however
On 10/30/06 02:38:52PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > Last week I switched to Edgy (Ubuntu). While I was still with Debian,
> > I stopped using suspend to RAM (months ago) and used suspend to disk
> > instead. The in-kernel implementation is quite stable on my notebook
> > but sucks in all o
On 04/21/06 10:19:46AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 20, Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Idea: if /etc/iftab is present on upgrade, you can consume it, producing
> > relevant rules in that place (and displaying a message to the admin).
> An even better idea is, on the upgrade
reassign 358365 yaird
thanks
On 03/22/06 02:23:27PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 02:11:15PM +0100, David Förster wrote:
> >
> > Installation fails with the following output:
> >
> > Setting up linux-image-2.6.16-1-k7 (2.6.16-1) ...
> > Running depmod.
> > Finding val
On 01/24/06 09:56:26PM +0100, Ludovic Drolez wrote:
>
>
> maximilian attems wrote:
> > reassign 347933 lufs-source
> > stop
> >
> > On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Ludovic Drolez wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I reopen this bug because I have the same bug but no Nvidia card.
> >
> >
> > you only posted only parts
On 09/02/05 09:45:18AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
>
> First: this discussion is pointless and always ends in people promoting
> their favorite toy (only).
>
True, but since most people don't have enough time or resources to do
exhaustive testing of every possible option, anecdotal evidence from
On 08/30/05 06:29:02PM +0200, David Madore wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:20:37PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > Appart from my general feeling that no one should use Reiser FS,
>
> Why is that? I mean, certainly every filesystem has its problems, but
> I don't think there's a consensus that Reiser
On 05/24/05 05:38:58PM -0700, David S.Miller wrote:
> From: "Jim Crilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 14:42:27 -0400
>
> > True, but building kernels on sparc64 wasn't terribly fun for me the last
> > time I tried it either so I deci
On 05/24/05 02:29:16PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 01:32:54AM -0400, Jim Crilly wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Make the login environment be sparc32 by default. Doesn't that
> > > > solve the problem? And for die-hard 64-bit people
> >
> > Make the login environment be sparc32 by default. Doesn't that
> > solve the problem? And for die-hard 64-bit people like me they
> > can undo this via some configuration mechanism.
> >
> > It is one option.
>
> That's probably too ugly for some ppl. Then we'll have to answer the
> que
10 matches
Mail list logo
