Bug#791676: libmpich-dev 3.4~a2+really3.3.2-2 has broken Fortran due to gfortran-10 specific flags

2020-08-10 Thread Jed Brown
I'm replying here because I think it's part of this bug, but more severe in practice. It was evidently built with gfortran-10, but depends on gfortran-9, which doesn't recognize these arguments. $ cat > a.f90 program main end ^D $ mpifort a.f90 f95: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-fall

Bug#953116: [petsc-maint] 32 bit vs 64 bit PETSc

2020-05-25 Thread Jed Brown
Drew Parsons writes: > On 2020-05-23 14:49, Drew Parsons wrote: >> On 2020-05-23 14:18, Jed Brown wrote: >> >>> I wonder if you are aware of any static analysis tools that can >>> flag implicit conversions of this sort: >>> &g

Bug#953116: [petsc-maint] 32 bit vs 64 bit PETSc

2020-05-22 Thread Jed Brown
Drew Parsons writes: > Hi, the Debian project is discussing whether we should start providing a > 64 bit build of PETSc (which means we'd have to upgrade our entire > computational library stack, starting from BLAS and going through MPI, > MUMPS, etc). You don't need to change BLAS or MPI. >