t time, I'll keep as much information
as I can ... Hopefully, there wont be a next time.
Anyway, thx for your time.
Carm
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:15:03 +0100, "Francesco P. Lovergine"
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 03:05:17PM +0100, Jean Couillaud wrote:
>> I suspected proftpd an
sco P. Lovergine"
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 03:05:17PM +0100, Jean Couillaud wrote:
>> I suspected proftpd and a quick look at the proftpd logs shows a really
>> great number of login attempts (bruteforce like) and several "too long
>> command" thingies (I&
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:15:03 +0100, "Francesco P. Lovergine"
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 03:05:17PM +0100, Jean Couillaud wrote:
>> I suspected proftpd and a quick look at the proftpd logs shows a really
>> great number of login attempts (bruteforce like) and sev
ast and thanks for any further hint you
might provide.
Carm
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 12:04:26 +0100, "Francesco P. Lovergine"
wrote:
> tag 603555 + moreinfo
> thanks
>
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:18:35AM +0100, Jean Couillaud wrote:
>>
>> Package: proftpd-basic
Package: proftpd-basic
Version: 1.3.3a-5
Hi,
My server just got rooted and what I've done for now, to dig into what
could have
been the leak, points to proftpd, mod_facl in particular.
I won't have a way to dig further until this evening (UTC+1 local time),
but it is a testing(squeeze) debian a
Package: proftpd-basic
Version: 1.3.3a-5
Hi,
My server just got rooted and what I've done for now, to dig into what
could have
been the leak, points to proftpd, mod_facl in particular.
I won't have a way to dig further until this evening (UTC+1 local time),
but it is a testing(squeeze) debian a
6 matches
Mail list logo
