On 10/02/2014 6:21 AM, "Ian Jackson"
wrote:
>
> Keith Packard writes ("Re: call for votes on default Linux init system
for jessie"):
> > Let's finish that vote then and move on.
>
> Once again Bdale has proposed a vote on his own motion.
>
> However, my own proposal was on the table and has not be
> we will not help you
If you want to run a configuration that is not supported by a developer,
then no, I would not expect them to help you.
Free software does not entitle you to free help, nor does it entitle you to
demand others do or don't do things a particular way.
The point that is being made is not "you can't run software with shell
scripts if you want", it's "don't expect developers to write or maintain
them for you".
Regards, James Rhodes.
On 3 February 2014 12:48, Thilos Rich wrote:
> >Plus sysvinit supp
debunked. This bug is long enough.
Regards, James Rhodes.
Redpoint Software
http://about.me/james.rhodes
On 2 February 2014 11:11, Thilos Rich wrote:
> Init should be simple, secure, and get out of the way. It should not take
> over the system. We should not be forced to use an
On 30 January 2014 09:54, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 19:17:29 +0100
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
> > Gnome-shell uses GDM for screen locking, and GDM heavily relies on
> > logind nowadays. There is fallback code that uses ConsoleKit, but it
> > has been untested for se
5 matches
Mail list logo
