Bug#970672: nftables dnat port range

2020-10-02 Thread Igor M
Hello. Excuse my persistence, but the update didn't fix the problem. Maybe you have any other ideas? пн, 21 вер. 2020 о 19:00 Igor M пише: > Done: > > > +++-==-===--== > ii nf

Bug#970672: nftables dnat port range

2020-09-21 Thread Igor M
Gonzalez пише: > > > On 2020-09-21 11:12, Igor M wrote: > > apt search -t testing nftables > > ... > > nftables/testing,unstable 0.9.6-1 amd64 [upgradable from: 0.9.0-2] > > > > did you mean this version? > > > > Yes, or even better: > > buster-backports: 0.9.6-1~bpo10+1 >

Bug#970672: nftables dnat port range

2020-09-21 Thread Igor M
apt search -t testing nftables ... nftables/testing,unstable 0.9.6-1 amd64 [upgradable from: 0.9.0-2] did you mean this version? пн, 21 вер. 2020 о 12:03 Arturo Borrero Gonzalez пише: > On 2020-09-21 10:40, Igor M wrote: > > > > Package: nftables > > Version: 0.9.0-2 >

Bug#970672: nftables dnat port range

2020-09-21 Thread Igor M
Package: nftables Version: 0.9.0-2 Hello guys. I have a problem with dnat of port range. When I try to dnat: ip daddr $ext_ip tcp dport 55900-55910 dnat to $target_lan_host:5900-5910 persistent I want to dnat 55900 to 5900, 55901 to 5901...55910 to 5910. But all range 55900-55910 was redirected