On Sat, 2020-02-01 at 22:39 +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 07:41:03AM +0800, Ian Kent
> wrote:
> > > decided that nobody should use symlinks as bind mounts are the
> > > future(tm).
> > > From an upstream POV it was more neglect (on my part)
On Fri, 2020-01-31 at 18:15 +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 07:16:14PM +0800, Ian Kent
> wrote:
> > It looks like this package has the change that adds handling of
> > symlinks to umount_multi() so this should not be calling umount()
> > at all.
&g
On Fri, 2020-01-31 at 19:35 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-01-31 at 19:29 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> > On Fri, 2020-01-31 at 19:16 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2020-01-31 at 07:55 +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> > > > > > Sounds like I have
On Fri, 2020-01-31 at 19:29 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-01-31 at 19:16 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> > On Fri, 2020-01-31 at 07:55 +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> > > > > Sounds like I have enough information to duplicate the
> > > > > problem
>
On Fri, 2020-01-31 at 19:16 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-01-31 at 07:55 +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> > > > Sounds like I have enough information to duplicate the problem
> > > > so
> > > > I'll have a look see.
> > >
> > >
e change that adds handling of
symlinks to umount_multi() so this should not be calling umount()
at all.
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 02:07:54PM +0800, Ian Kent
> wrote:
> > A quick test with the current Fedora autofs package, autofs-5.1.5-
> > 10.fc30.x86_64, I see that
On Fri, 2020-01-31 at 13:34 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-01-31 at 01:09 +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:50:32PM +, Mike Gabriel <
> > sunwea...@debian.org> wrote:
> > > This seems like something to be discussed upstream. I Cc:ed
On Fri, 2020-01-31 at 13:34 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-01-31 at 01:09 +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:50:32PM +, Mike Gabriel <
> > sunwea...@debian.org> wrote:
> > > This seems like something to be discussed upstream. I Cc:ed
On Fri, 2020-01-31 at 01:09 +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:50:32PM +, Mike Gabriel <
> sunwea...@debian.org> wrote:
> > This seems like something to be discussed upstream. I Cc:ed Ian
> > Kent, maybe
> > he has some 2? to add.
>
>
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 01:54 -0800, ramana wrote:
> First thanks to Ian for providing valuable info for arrving at this
> conclusion.
>
> What happened? There is old autofs4 module which supported autofs4
> protocol. Autofs team developed new autofs5 protocol but new module
> given name as autofs4.
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 14:51 +0200, Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 06:18:58PM +0800, Ian Kent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This seems to cause the (now reproducable) problem. However, I have
> > > similar problems with the same automount setup on my 32
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, Marc Lehmann wrote:
>
> Let me explain. I have a 32 bit chrooted debian on /debian32, and I do
> "mount -n --rbind /fs /debian32/fs".
>
> This seems to cause the (now reproducable) problem. However, I have
> similar problems with the same automount setup on my 32 bit laptop
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005, Mirko Kohns wrote:
> Package: autofs-ldap
> Version: 4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-10
> Severity: normal
>
> When updating from autofs-ldap_4.1.3-4_i386 to
> autofs-ldap_4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-10_i386.deb
I'll have to have a look at the patches applied between -4 and -10.
>
> I get following
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Daniel Andre Vaquero wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:00:30AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Has this patch been tested with multi-mount map entries?
>
> I don't have experience with multi-mount map entries, but I have done a
> small test with entries li
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> tags 304226 + upstream
> thanks
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 12:45:55PM -0700, Ryan Murray wrote:
> > The defaults in auto.net specify to mount nfs shares with
> > rsize=8192,wsize=8192
> >
> > AFAIK, this was added back when the kernel defaulte
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Martin Ruppert wrote:
>
> First part is a screen log installing autofs_4.1.3-9 and trying to
> mount with it and then installing autofs_4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-7 and again
> trying to mount with. I didn't have version 4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-7 before
> today.
>
> And the good news: versio
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Martin Ruppert wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 10:30:12 +0800 (WST), raven wrote:
> > On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> >> On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 04:51:09PM +0200, Martin Ruppert wrote:
> >>> i not only mount one partition, but a whole system (df -T shortened):
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 11:10:42PM +1100, Tim Connors wrote:
> > If restarting autofs when a mountpoint is busy, or if the daemon has
> > been killed manually, then the script never gets around to doing
> > anything, failing midsentence, without p
18 matches
Mail list logo
