> That's not the only problem. Betamax will (and currently is) an imporant
dependency of OpenStack packages.
It doesn't seem that important to me. It's currently been added as a
*test* dependency and it's only in *one* project
(http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=betamax&i=nope&files=&repos=). Yes
On Jan 23, 2016 11:54 PM, "Brian May" wrote:
>
> Ian Cordasco writes:
>
> > If you'd like to develop patches to make backporting requests without
> > backporting the necessary version of urllib3, that's fine. I don't
> > think there sh
Hi Thomas,
Requests has a policy of only supporting one version of urllib3. As
such, Debian attempting to be less restrictive will result in Debian
having to carry patches for those versions of urllib3 which Requests
will not support. The Requests project has already made accommodations
with Debia
Hi Thomas,
We already have an offer to sponsor:
https://github.com/sigmavirus24/betamax/issues/57#issuecomment-92038957
Daniele and I both plan to be more cooperative and responsive after this
weekend.
Cheers,
Ian
pgplLEydISfNg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi Geert,
I'm the author of Betamax. While its primary use is for testing (and it has
integrations with different testing utilities to help with testing projects)
people have and do use it in other contexts (although they're in the
minority).
That said, Betamax does not behave like a proxy would
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Daniele Tricoli wrote:
> Hello Ian,
> sorry for this late response I was a bit busy this month.
No worries
>> Trying to have both python-chardet and python3-chardet in the same
>> package was causing a lot of problems and overall hair-pulling. charade
>> is just
6 matches
Mail list logo
