Bug#987008: grub LVM bug #987008: experimental package available, please test

2023-02-27 Thread Hoyer, David
I was not able to use the grub2 build as-is because we are running bullseye and the built image required newer versions of glibc. However, I grabbed the original source code from Debian and the Debian code patch from https://people.debian.org/~anarcat/debian/sid/ and rebuilt it myself with minor

Bug#987008: Grub fails to find LVM volume after previous LV rename

2021-09-24 Thread Hoyer, David
On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 09:57:35 +0200 Rogier wrote: > Additional information for the benefit of anybody who uses LVM and > grub, and is unsure if or when this problem will affect them: > > Besides the system being rendered unbootable, another symptom of this > problem being acute is that, at tha

Bug#987008: Grub fails to find LVM volume after previous LV rename

2021-04-15 Thread Hoyer, David
Package: grub2 Version: 2.02+dfsg1-20+deb10u4 -- System Information: Debian Release: 10.8 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-14-clp-eseries-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=C.UTF-8 (char

Bug#926896: sysvinit-utils: pidof is unreliable

2019-11-04 Thread Hoyer, David
I agree - I was just keeping the style consistent. I would argue that it was totally unnecessary to do the check to all of these in the first place. I would also argue that a function should be added which performs this clean up so that it does not have to be repeated multiple times like it

Bug#926896: sysvinit-utils: pidof is unreliable

2019-11-04 Thread Hoyer, David
I am not seeing how it would have skipped the zombie processes in the past but I also did not closely review that code.I did see in the comments that skipping those processes was put in place because the stats would sometimes fail. I would argue that this should have been handled at the po

Bug#926896: sysvinit-utils: pidof is unreliable

2019-10-22 Thread Hoyer, David
We have also been experiencing this problem since moving to Buster. We never saw this with Jessie. I believe it comes down to the following code in readproc: if ( (strchr(process_status, 'D') != NULL) || (strchr(process_status, 'Z') != NUL