On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 19:44 +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
>
> The file dbus-types.h contains very silly typedefs that will probably
> break on any architecture where an int does not have the same size or
> signedness as on i386:
>
> typedef unsigned int dbus_bool_t;
> typedef unsigned short dbus_
On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 23:41 +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 04:48:17PM -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> > > Sure, but as you can see, the current typedefs could well be the cause
> > > of a security hole on another architecture. The blind wrapping do
On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 22:32 +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
>
> Sure, but as you can see, the current typedefs could well be the cause
> of a security hole on another architecture. The blind wrapping done in
> dbus-types.h is detrimental to security.
>
D-BUS will fail make check in quite a few places
On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 21:19 +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 02:31:37PM -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> > > It also introduces its own types, while there are perfectly well defined
> > > and standardised types that do exactly what dbus needs in
On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 15:59 -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Even outside of software
^desktop
Havoc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5 matches
Mail list logo
