On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:13:23 +0200
intrigeri wrote:
> Dominic Hargreaves wrote (01 Apr 2012 16:18:49 GMT) :
> > Probably the best way to enable hardening flags is to switch the
> > package to the minimal dh rules style with a dh compat level of 9,
> > depending on debhelper (>= 9.20120312).
>
nerally non-functional in this case. One example of such
Thanks for your input. I will upload a fix for this
soon and try to get that one into a point release.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: m...@fhinzmann.de
severity 619936 important
thanks
This might hinder me in getting the resulting bugfix
into a point release, but anyway:
The package is usable in most installations, so
the definition of severity "important" is
eminently suited.
Regards
Florian
--
Floria
ing time and sorry for not debugging in the first place
> myself.
You are welcome - and no problem at all. Thank you for
debugging it now.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: m...@fhinzmann.de
Debian: f.
Hello!
Please allow another question before I return to this issue
later: Which shell do you use when this problem occurs?
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmannprivate: m...@fhinzmann.de
Debian: f...@debian.org
PGP Key / ID: 1024D
;which dig" and "dig -v" say?
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmannprivate: m...@fhinzmann.de
Debian: f...@debian.org
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65
--
To UNSUBSCRI
This message did not make it to the bug tracking system. Trying
again.
--Florian Hinzmann
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:47:23 +0100
From: Florian Hinzmann
To: 598...@bugs.debian.org, Debian mdadm maintainers
Subject: Want to make output of informational message depend on
tags 366793 -unreproducible
tags 364922 +moreinfo
retitle 364922 Can't use string ("Net::DNS::RR::MX") while "strict refs" in use
(duplicate of 366793)
merge 366793 364922
thanks
Hello!
This bug is the same as 366793 and will be dealt with there.
Regards
Floria
would
need some effort which should be put into the underlying socket
modules if at all.
I deem this issue as done, the bug will remain open to document
the impact on etch installations.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmannprivate: f.hinzm...@hamburg.de
-------
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmannprivate: f.hinzm...@hamburg.de
Debian: f...@debian.org
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist
iour Lucas reported
nevertheless and will ask him for more information if I
fail.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmannprivate: f.hinzm...@hamburg.de
Debian: f...@debian.org
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C
again.
--
Florian Hinzmann private: f.hinzm...@hamburg.de
Debian: f...@debian.org
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dis
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:13:01 +0100
Florian Hinzmann wrote:
> Do we have a policy or best practice on what to do about tests in
> general and online tests in particular with respect to build daemons?
Kind of P.S.:
I assumed the build daemons would both
- have online access and
- use noch
he whole test suite disabled
within debian/rules before as to go easy on our build daemons.
Now with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck I did enable them, but
skip if nocheck was given.
Do we have a policy or best practice on what to do about tests in
general and online tests in particular with resp
Hello!
I will suggest the IPv6 package for now and discuss whether
recommending it might be even better. In light of IPv6 support
being a release goal this might be appropriate.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmannprivate: f.hinzm...@hamburg.de
g-summary1.13-1 summarize the contents of a syslog
-- debconf information excluded
--
Florian Hinzmann private: f.hinzm...@hamburg.de
Debian: f...@debian.org
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E
.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: f.hinzm...@hamburg.de
Debian: f...@debian.org
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
Hello!
I have prepared an upload of the new upstream version. I will
continue working on the randomisation and make an upload tomorrow.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: f.hinzm...@hamburg.de
Debian: f
after lenny by error. I am sorry.
> can you please hijack libnet-dns-perl and get this resolved?
I considered joining it anyway. If someone wants to work on this
within the next days, feel free to beat me.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann privat
no rescuer appears in time to do an last upload
before the general freeze at latest.
Opinions anyone? Steve?
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A
e.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
Hello!
Upstream is preparing an update. I will use that solution or coordinate
enhancements if need arises. It should be a matter of days.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL
Hello!
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:15:24 +0100
Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> what about this patch?
I am not sure yet. I will investigate more deeply within the
next days. I did contact the author of Net::DNS already.
Regards
Florian
--
Flor
Hello!
This was fixed in version 0.61. I am going to close this bug
with the pending upload of 0.62-1. Please forgive me for not
uploading this more early.
Regards
Florian Hinzmann
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED
reported to be half-configured by our package system.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374
t with the change mentioned
above it would have been in etch up to end of August 2006 - so it is not
really new code for etch, just code back from vacation. ;)
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would love
to change that.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65
control
Description: Binary data
quot;-nr" are read
correctly in this form.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A
side note: Does anyone know wether this bug is still
present in Debian unstable/testing?
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint
running at that machine?
libnet-dns-perl version 0.59-1 just hit unstable. It would be nice to
know if this error happens with 0.59, too.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL
reopen 223928 !
close 223928 0.48-1
thanks
I think it was fixed in time for sarge and three installations using
that version back up my belief.
If someone gets this error with a sarge installation, please give me
a note.
Greetings
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 09:38:17 +0200
Florian Hinzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 01:28:27 +0200
> Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Florian Hinzmann wrote:
>
> > Oops, I already uploaded, though to DELAYED-1.
> > Uplo
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 01:28:27 +0200
Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Florian Hinzmann wrote:
> Oops, I already uploaded, though to DELAYED-1.
> Upload the day after tomorrow and you can also acknowledge the nMU.
> Sorry, I didn't expect you to be so responsive. These b
pect an inmediate upload.
It is? Anyway, I am not easily offended by NMUs and I had a fair
warning.
Best greetings
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key / ID: 1024D
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Package: libetpan3
Version: 0.39.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Good morning!
There is version 0.40 available at http://libetpan.sourceforge.net/ .
I'd love to see this in Debian and would be thankful to hear any information
about when this is anticipated.
Thanks
Florian
-- System Information:
D
Hello!
It is my fault, libnet-dns-perl has to depend on libnet-ip-perl.
Fixed package is on its way. Temporary fix is installing libnet-ip-perl
manually.
I will close "my" bug #333249 with next upload.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann priva
.
Note, this does not mean the package is backported to oldstable now. I
just changed this line in Debian rules as it may help and it does not
hurt otherwise.
Greetings
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello!
Thanks for the reminder, Florian and thanks for the research, Andrew.
I will upload the new version this weekend.
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 10:19:47 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's a relief, it means xfmail in the NMU should be working fine...
Yes, it does work fine. I've installed and testet it.
Thanks.
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann
does not include libsaslX?
Regards
Florian
--
Florian Hinzmann private: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key / ID: 1024D/B4071A65
Fingerprint : F9AB 00C1 3E3A 8125 DD3F DF1C DF79 A374 B407 1A65
41 matches
Mail list logo
