Bug#1105204: udev: networking broken by interface name change upgrading from bookworm to trixie enp1s0 -> ens1

2025-05-13 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Package: udev Version: 257.5-2 Severity: important Hi! We tested a bookworm to trixie update on one of our systems. The host did not come back online after reboot, and the issue seems to be caused by the 252 -> 257 systemd update. The main network interface on the system was named "enp1s0" by sy

Bug#1104787: cdftools: add support for parallel builds

2025-05-06 Thread Emanuele Rocca
-build-options Thanks! Emanuele >From f48d9086372b33b0ec2df93d48a054356699a54e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emanuele Rocca Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 14:55:59 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Support parallel builds --- debian/rules | 9 +++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) d

Bug#1104786: cdftools: do not override FFLAGS

2025-05-06 Thread Emanuele Rocca
://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/PACBTI#Packages_overriding_the_default_build_flags From: Emanuele Rocca Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 14:41:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Do not override FFLAGS --- debian/macro.f95_debian | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/debian/macro.f95_debian b/debian

Bug#1104783: cal: do not override CFLAGS and CC

2025-05-06 Thread Emanuele Rocca
https://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/PACBTI#Packages_overriding_the_default_build_flags From: Emanuele Rocca Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 13:38:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Honor CC and CFLAGS environment variables --- src/makefile.unx | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/makefile.unx

Bug#1104777: bustools: do not hardcode CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS

2025-05-06 Thread Emanuele Rocca
attached. Emanuele From: Emanuele Rocca Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 10:59:33 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Use default CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS set by dpkg --- CMakeLists.txt | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt b/CMakeLists.txt index 837b203..40310af 100644 --- a

Bug#1104773: aespipe: please package new upstream version 2.4i

2025-05-06 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: aespipe Version: 2.4h-1 Severity: wishlist User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pac-bti There is a new upstream version of aespipe available, 2.4i. It includes support for PAC/BTI on arm64, and it would be nice to have it in Debian at some point. Thanks! Emanuele

Bug#1103962: RM: raku [arm64 armel armhf] -- ROM; depends on moarvm which is not provided on arm*

2025-04-23 Thread Emanuele Rocca
pstream? Where can we find out more about it? Thanks, Emanuele

Bug#1103921: fossil FTCBFS for arm64: passes -mbranch-protection=standard to the build compiler

2025-04-23 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hello Helmut, On 2025-04-22 10:19, Helmut Grohne wrote: > +override_dh_auto_build: > + dh_auto_build -- 'BCCFLAGS=$(CPPFLAGS_FOR_BUIL) $(CFLAGS_FOR_BUILD)' It looks like there's a typo here, this should be CPPFLAGS_FOR_BUILD.

Bug#1089433: shim-helpers-arm64-signed: Supporting rootless builds by default

2025-04-11 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hello Niels, On 2024-12-28 01:06, Niels Thykier wrote: > Please review attached as an example of how to fix this problem. > > Note: Untested, since I was doing my testing on amd64. LGTM. I applied your patch and built the package with a regular user as follows: $ dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -b -r

Bug#1102422: tpm tpm0: tpm_try_transmit: send(): error -62

2025-04-11 Thread Emanuele Rocca
ta Revision: 3 TPM Vendor ID: IFX Vendor Specific data: 042203f2 0274706d 3338 ff TPM Version: 0101 Manufacturer Info: 49465800 Finally, I see that you're booting your kernel with pci=noaer. Any specific reasons for that? Thanks, Emanuele

Bug#1102422: tpm tpm0: tpm_try_transmit: send(): error -62

2025-04-10 Thread Emanuele Rocca
r performing some specific tpm operations? - Have you by any chance upgraded/downgraded your coreboot firmware? - Please share the full output from dmesg. - Please try a more recent kernel from bookworm-backports to see if the problem can still be reproduced. See https://backports.debian.org/Instructions/ Thanks, Emanuele

Bug#1101295: binutils: some tests running despite DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck

2025-03-25 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: binutils Version: 2.44-3 Severity: normal Hi, while building binutils with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck, I noticed that at least some of the upstream tests were still being executed: [...] Schedule of variations: unix Running target unix Using /usr/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as

Bug#1100973: RM: desmume [arm64 ppc64el] -- ROM; build fails

2025-03-21 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi, On 2025-03-21 09:59, Bastian Germann wrote: > Please remove desmume from arm64 and ppc64el to let the pkg migrate to > trixie. The build fails on these archs and it is unlikely that somone is > going to run the program there. Please don't remove the arm64 version just yet. The software has ex

Bug#1100805: gcc-14 version 14.2.0-18 causes glibc to be miscompiled on armhf

2025-03-20 Thread Emanuele Rocca
On 2025-03-19 09:45, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > So far my finding are quite limited. It seems the new GCC generates more > optimized code in general, and especially for the memmem() function, and > that changes the location of the memmove() function located just after in > the binary. Aligning it to 6

Bug#1100634: linux: Please enable CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL for arm64 kernel

2025-03-20 Thread Emanuele Rocca
On 2025-03-19 08:01, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 03:47:11PM +0100, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > > Makes sense. Also noteworthy, CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL is enabled on arm64 on > > at least Fedora/RHEL/SuSE too. > > Please provide a justification. - Needed for perf

Bug#1100634: linux: Please enable CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL for arm64 kernel

2025-03-17 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi, On 2025-03-16 01:20, Hastalavista_debian wrote: > I wish to use LKRG (https://lkrg.org) on my RPi, but it reported error "LKRG > requires > CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL" when building, which is strange to me because I have > never > run > into such problems on amd64 laptops. I checked config file of a

Bug#1071791: bing: FTBFS: bing_probes.c:259:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘memcpy’

2025-03-15 Thread Emanuele Rocca
ate->pattern, > | ^~ > bing_probes.c:31:1: note: include ‘’ or provide a declaration of > ‘memcpy’ The fix suggested by the compiler (first part) works fine. See attached patch. Emanuele >From ad2111765318727b9ce8ff40ddd25ae7ec728ce4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:0

Bug#1100497: blahtexml: diff for NMU version 0.9-1.2

2025-03-14 Thread Emanuele Rocca
gelog blahtexml-0.9/debian/changelog --- blahtexml-0.9/debian/changelog 2012-04-20 12:59:48.0 +0200 +++ blahtexml-0.9/debian/changelog 2025-03-14 13:58:43.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,15 @@ +blahtexml (0.9-1.2) unstable; urgency=medium + + [ Emanuele Rocca ] + * Non-maintainer upload. + * D

Bug#1100494: blahtexml: build with default build flags

2025-03-14 Thread Emanuele Rocca
rom ab969b5f8620be60c2ad6aef144b99e1d254f5e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emanuele Rocca Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 13:58:22 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Do not override CFLAGS, use CXXFLAGS for cpp --- makefile | 12 +--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/makefile b/makefile index 3249

Bug#1100488: atlas-ecmwf: do not override default build flags

2025-03-14 Thread Emanuele Rocca
the appropriate flags. This is necessary, among other things, to enable PAC/BTI on arm64: https://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/PACBTI Thanks, Emanuele >From 9c782b057222cd4b1da4499029ead6609013a765 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emanuele Rocca Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 11:02:37 + Subject: [PA

Bug#1099599: anytun: add support for parallel builds

2025-03-05 Thread Emanuele Rocca
snippet in d/rules should do the trick: # Support parallel builds ifneq (,$(filter parallel=%,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) NJOBS := -j $(patsubst parallel=%,%,$(filter parallel=%,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) endif And then pass the variable to make, something like: $(MAKE) $(NJOBS) Thanks! Emanuele

Bug#1099598: anytun: please use default build flags

2025-03-05 Thread Emanuele Rocca
"Usage in debian/rules" in dpkg-buildflags(1). Thanks, Emanuele

Bug#1099594: antimony: honor CXXFLAGS

2025-03-05 Thread Emanuele Rocca
should do the trick: set(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS "$ENV{CXXFLAGS} -Wall -Wextra -Werror=switch") Thanks, Emanuele

Bug#1060969: android-platform-external-libunwind: diff for NMU version 10.0.0+r36-4.1

2025-03-05 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi, I've prepared an NMU for android-platform-external-libunwind (versioned as 10.0.0+r36-4.1). Please find the diff attached. commit a2061b471eb85b27f67be83e0febd657e01d35ca Author: Emanuele Rocca Date: Wed Mar 5 13:38:39 2025 +0100 Update path to 7zip to fix FTBFS #1060969 diff --

Bug#1099427: alevt: do not override default build flags

2025-03-03 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: alevt Version: 1:1.8.2-2 User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pac-bti Hi, alevt currently hardcodes CFLAGS in the Makefile: https://sources.debian.org/src/alevt/1%3A1.8.2-2/Makefile/#L17 Please consider appending to CFLAGS instead, to make alevt use the default CFLAGS set by dpkg-

Bug#1099104: acme: do not override CFLAGS and CC

2025-02-28 Thread Emanuele Rocca
variable should similarly be honored to allow users to build the program with a different compiler. This can be useful for instance to test building with an older compiler when investigating compiler regressions. Thanks! Emanuele [1] https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Conditional

Bug#1099103: acm: build dis_relay with default build flags

2025-02-28 Thread Emanuele Rocca
-decls -c dis_relay.c -o dis_relay.o Please ensure that acm honors CFLAGS when building dis_relay too. Thanks! Emanuele

Bug#1099020: ace: add support for parallel builds

2025-02-27 Thread Emanuele Rocca
-deb-build-options Thanks! Emanuele commit a748bbfa58911ed3bd90d2318a459140b5aebf46 Author: Emanuele Rocca Date: Thu Feb 27 10:28:47 2025 + Support parallel builds diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index 5e37786..91053f8 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -15,6

Bug#1099019: ace: actually build with hardening flags and enable branch protection

2025-02-27 Thread Emanuele Rocca
actually build with hardening flags, and enable branch protection. Thanks! Emanuele diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index a1da33b..5e37786 100755 --- a/debian/rules +++ b/debian/rules @@ -9,11 +9,10 @@ # Copyright © 2010-2014 Johnny Willemsen #export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening

Bug#1098949: 64tass: do not override default build flags, increase build verbosity

2025-02-26 Thread Emanuele Rocca
possible according to Policy 4.9: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules Thanks, Emanuele [1] https://manpages.debian.org/unstable/dpkg-dev/dpkg-buildflags.1.en.html From: Emanuele Rocca Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 14:51:46 +0100 X-Dgit-Generated

Bug#1096202: 3d-ascii-viewer-c: do not override default build flags

2025-02-17 Thread Emanuele Rocca
users wishing to do so can compile the program with a compiler other than gcc. Thanks, Emanuele [1] https://manpages.debian.org/unstable/dpkg-dev/dpkg-buildflags.1.en.html Index: 3d-ascii-viewer-c-1.4.0+git20240503+ds/Makefile

Bug#879106: debian-installer-utils: "list-devices disk" should consider persistent memory block devices

2025-01-09 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi Ard, On 2017-10-19 02:41, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > When booting an .iso image via HTTP boot from UEFI, the .iso image will > be exposed to the OS as a ramdisk via the ACPI NFIT table, and will be > picked up by the existing NFIT code in the kernel, which will expose it > as a /dev/pmemXXX device

Bug#1057544: barrier: FTBFS: failing test

2024-12-17 Thread Emanuele Rocca
station the build shows no test failure. I tried however to build in a VM with only one CPU core available, ie: passing the "-smp 1" argument to qemu. The build fails. Interestingly, this is the case also with -smp 2. With -smp 3 the build seems fine. Emanuele

Bug#1079874: valgrind: FTBFS with mpich instead of openmpi

2024-12-17 Thread Emanuele Rocca
https://people.debian.org/~ema/valgrind_armhf-2024-12-17T09:07:39Z.build https://people.debian.org/~ema/valgrind_i386-2024-12-17T09:04:47Z.build Can you please double-check once again? Thanks, Emanuele

Bug#1080187: FTBFS with upcoming doxygen

2024-12-17 Thread Emanuele Rocca
to fail the build due to doxygen, and > one of those is this one. The version of doxygen currently in unstable is 1.9.8+ds-2, and toulbar2 builds fine with it. Downgrading severity, please feel free to raise it again once doxygen 1.12.0 enters sid. Thanks, Emanuele

Bug#1088974: chromium: 131.0.6778.85-1~deb12u1 in bookworm-security fails to start on arm64: stack smashing detected

2024-12-06 Thread Emanuele Rocca
On 2024-12-06 05:25, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS=-stackprotector Apologies, I meant: DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS=hardening=-stackprotector

Bug#1088974: chromium: 131.0.6778.85-1~deb12u1 in bookworm-security fails to start on arm64: stack smashing detected

2024-12-06 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi, On 2024-12-03 12:27, Andres Salomon wrote: > Currently waiting on #1088699 to fix this. On arm64 I tried building chromium 131.0.6778.85-1~deb12u1 without stack protector, and the resulting build does not crash: DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS=-stackprotector Not ideal, but better than a chromium

Bug#1088974: chromium: 131.0.6778.85-1~deb12u1 in bookworm-security fails to start on arm64: stack smashing detected

2024-12-06 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi Andres, On 2024-12-03 12:27, Andres Salomon wrote: > Currently waiting on #1088699 to fix this. I tried building the affected chromium version using clang from bookworm-proposed-updates with CC=clang-19 and CXX=clang++-19, and with the following build-depends bumped: lld-19, clang-19, cla

Bug#1089007: sbuild: unshare backend fails to build gcc since version 0.86.0

2024-12-03 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Package: sbuild Version: 0.86.0 Severity: important Hi! Starting with version 0.86.0, sbuild using the unshare backend does not build gcc packages successfully, at least on arm64 and amd64. The version immediately before that, 0.85.11, works. Similar failures have been seen on other architectures

Bug#1088974: chromium: 131.0.6778.85-1~deb12u1 in bookworm-security fails to start on arm64: stack smashing detected

2024-12-03 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Package: chromium Version: 131.0.6778.85-1~deb12u1 Severity: serious User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: arm64 On arm64 systems, the version of chromium currently in bookworm-security (131.0.6778.85-1~deb12u1) fails to start with several "stack smashing detected" errors. The bookworm versi

Bug#1087943: halide: FTBFS on arm64 with SVE: Unhandled exception: Error: For SVE/SVE2 support, target_vector_bits= must be set in target

2024-11-20 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: halide Version: 18.0.0-8 Severity: normal Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: arm64, sve On arm64 systems with SVE support halide fails to build with the following error: [2087/4204] cd /<>-build/build/stage-0/halide/python_bindings/apps && /<>-build/bui

Bug#1087922: apt: normalize HTTP URIs before sending requests

2024-11-20 Thread Emanuele Rocca
h as: curl http://localhost:8000/./testpackage_1.0.0-1_all.deb In the specific case of curl, the --path-as-is option can be used to skip normalization and reproduce. Thanks, Emanuele

Bug#1087560: tiledarray: FTBFS: Expected Boost config file at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/Boost-1.74.0/BoostConfig.cmake

2024-11-15 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: tiledarray Version: 1.0.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs During a rebuild of all packages in sid, tiledarray failed to build from source on both amd64 and arm64 with the following error message: -- Performing Test EIGEN3_COMPILES - Success CMake Error at /

Bug#1087556: singularity-container: FTBFS: undefined: errdefs.ToGRPC

2024-11-15 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: singularity-container Version: 4.1.5+ds3-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs During a rebuild of all packages in sid, singularity-container failed to build from source on both amd64 and arm64 with the following error message: github.com/sylabs/singularity/vendo

Bug#1087552: nthash: FTBFS on arm64: undefined reference to `omp_get_num_threads'

2024-11-15 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: nthash Version: 2.3.0+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: arm64 During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build on arm64. On amd64 it builds correctly. Here is the error message: [ 75%] Lin

Bug#1087554: seqkit: FTBFS: undefined: decor.DidentRight

2024-11-15 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: seqkit Version: 2.8.2+ds-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs During a rebuild of all packages in sid, seqkit failed to build from source on both amd64 and arm64 with the following error message: github.com/shenwei356/seqkit/seqkit/cmd # github.com/shenwei356/se

Bug#1087502: fiat-ecmwf: FTBFS on arm64: Imported target "MPI::MPI_Fortran" includes non-existent path /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/fortran/gfortran-mod-15/openmpi

2024-11-14 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: fiat-ecmwf Version: 1.4.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: arm64 During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build on arm64. On amd64 it builds correctly. It seems that the build uses /usr/lib/x

Bug#1087439: dbcsr: FTBFS on arm64: Imported target "MPI::MPI_Fortran" includes non-existent path /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/fortran/gfortran-mod-15/openmpi

2024-11-13 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: dbcsr Version: 2.6.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: arm64 During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build on arm64. On amd64 it builds correctly. It seems that the build uses /usr/lib/x86_64

Bug#1087437: coccinelle: FTBFS: Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced!

2024-11-13 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: coccinelle Version: 1.2.deb-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs During a rebuild of all packages in sid, coccinelle failed to build on arm64 and amd64 with the following error. [7] Underfull \hbox (badness 1) in paragraph at lines 76--82 ! Missing \cr inse

Bug#1087037: xserver-xorg-video-trident: FTBFS on arm64: implicit declaration of function 'outw'; did you mean 'putw'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

2024-11-08 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: xserver-xorg-video-trident Version: 1:1.4.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: arm64 During a rebuild of all packages in sid, xserver-xorg-video-trident failed to build on arm64 with the following error. On amd64 the

Bug#1087036: xserver-xorg-video-tdfx: FTBFS on arm64: implicit declaration of function 'outw'; did you mean 'putw'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

2024-11-08 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: xserver-xorg-video-tdfx Version: 1:1.5.0-5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: arm64 During a rebuild of all packages in sid, xserver-xorg-video-tdfx failed to build on arm64 with the following error. On amd64 the packag

Bug#1087034: superlu-dist: FTBFS on arm64: Imported target "MPI::MPI_Fortran" includes non-existent path /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/fortran/gfortran-mod-15/openmpi

2024-11-08 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: superlu-dist Version: 8.2.1+dfsg1-5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: arm64 During a rebuild of all packages in sid, superlu-dist failed to build on arm64 with the following error. On amd64 the package builds correctly

Bug#1087020: rocsparse: FTBFS: Handler for event 'html-page-context' threw an exception (exception: 'generate_nav_html')

2024-11-08 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: rocsparse Version: 5.7.1-5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs During a rebuild of all packages in sid, rocsparse failed to build with the following error. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sphinx/cmd/build.py", line 337,

Bug#1086957: mfem: FTBFS on arm64: undefined reference to `ompi_mpi_cxx_op_intercept'

2024-11-07 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: mfem Version: 4.7+ds-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: arm64 During a rebuild of all packages in sid, mfem failed to build on arm64 with the following error. On amd64 the package builds correctly. /usr/bin/ld: warni

Bug#1086834: elkcode: FTBFS on arm64: Nonexistent include directory ‘/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openmpi/lib’

2024-11-06 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: elkcode Version: 9.6.8-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: arm64 During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build on arm64. On amd64 it builds correctly. It seems that the build uses /usr/lib/x86_

Bug#1086835: groonga: FTBFS: cannot stat './html/_static/webpack-macros.html': No such file or directory

2024-11-06 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: groonga Version: 14.0.5+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs During a rebuild of all packages in sid, groonga failed to build from source on both amd64 and arm64 with the following error message: /usr/bin/install: cannot stat './html/_static/webpack-macros.

Bug#1086759: kf6-ktexttemplate: Please drop -mno-late-ldp-fusion on arm64

2024-11-05 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: kf6-ktexttemplate Version: 6.6.0-1 Severity: wishlist Hi, gcc-14 14.2.0-8 includes a fix for #1080974. I've just double-checked that kf6-ktexttemplate 6.6.0-1 now builds properly on arm64 without the need for -mno-late-ldp-fusion. Please drop it from d/rules. Thanks! Emanuele

Bug#1080974: kf6-ktexttemplate: FTBFS on arm64 with gcc-14 and optimization level 2

2024-10-31 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream On 2024-10-29 08:35, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > Meanwhile the issue has been fixed upstream in GCC (trunk), a backport > to 14 should be coming soon: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116783#c6 Here is the backport, merged in the gcc-14 bran

Bug#1086434: coreboot: FTBFS on arm64: ‘return’ with no value, in function returning non-void [-Wreturn-mismatch]

2024-10-30 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: coreboot Version: 4.15~dfsg-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs During a rebuild of all packages in sid, this package failed to build on arm64 with the following error. On amd64 the package builds correctly. accessors/cmos-hw-unix.c: In function ‘cmos_hal_read’

Bug#1080974: kf6-ktexttemplate: FTBFS on arm64 with gcc-14 and optimization level 2

2024-10-29 Thread Emanuele Rocca
On 2024-09-11 06:52, Aurélien COUDERC wrote: > I have the change committed locally and will upload it with KF6 6.6 > which release is at the door and should be out on Sep 13th. Thanks. Meanwhile the issue has been fixed upstream in GCC (trunk), a backport to 14 should be coming soon: https://gcc.

Bug#1085704: auto-multiple-choice: race condition in d/t/gui causes sometimes autopkgtest failures

2024-10-23 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi, On 2024-10-23 11:12, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 23-10-2024 10:40, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > > Indeed the simplest repro is just running the following in a sid armhf > > schroot running on a amd64 host with binfmt qemu-user-static emulation > > on: > > For avoidance of

Bug#1085704: auto-multiple-choice: race condition in d/t/gui causes sometimes autopkgtest failures

2024-10-23 Thread Emanuele Rocca
On 2024-10-22 11:04, Étienne Mollier wrote: > I just saw the answer from Paul in parallel, and apparently the crash > condition also occurs in armhf on top of amd64. Indeed the simplest repro is just running the following in a sid armhf schroot running on a amd64 host with binfmt qemu-user-static

Bug#1084230: Bug#1085704: auto-multiple-choice: race condition in d/t/gui causes sometimes autopkgtest failures

2024-10-22 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi, On 2024-10-21 11:53, Étienne Mollier wrote: > The issue looks very specific to this way of running Xvfb :5, > other ways I know of within autopkgtests seem to be running fine > in the same configuration. Quick lookup of open xvfb issues > suggest that #1084230 could be relevant to the problem

Bug#1085682: util-linux: Please add support for missing Arm cores to lscpu in Bookworm

2024-10-21 Thread Emanuele Rocca
consider a stable update for this change. Emanuele

Bug#1082659: libunwind8: 1.7 regression: Xvfb segfaults on armhf

2024-10-01 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi Simon, On 2024-09-24 09:16, Simon McVittie wrote: > In a recent upload this failed on armhf, and only armhf: the actual > tests appear to have all succeeded, but then xvfb-run exited with status > 1 anyway. I am able to reproduce this on the armhf porterbox amdahl. > > A simplified reproducer

Bug#1080974: kf6-ktexttemplate: FTBFS on arm64 with gcc-14 and optimization level 2

2024-09-11 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hey Aurélien, On 2024-09-06 04:37, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > I thus tried to build the package with -O2 -mno-late-ldp-fusion, and > indeed it builds fine For the time being you can, if you want, drop the -O1 and build with -mno-late-ldp-fusion instead: export DEB_CXXFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND +

Bug#1081225: gdb: enable AMD GPU support

2024-09-10 Thread Emanuele Rocca
ne in order to test the functionality? Thanks, Emanuele [1] https://sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb.html/AMD-GPU.html

Bug#1081267: mir: FTBFS on several architectures: undefined reference to std::__cxx11::basic_string

2024-09-10 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: mir Version: 2.14.1-7 Severity: serious Tags: sid trixie ftbfs User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: arm64 armel armhf mir fails to build with the following error on arm64, armel, armhf, alpha, hppa, powerpc and sparc64. The problem can be reproduced with both GCC 14 and 13, hence it

Bug#1078750: pocl: FTBFS on arm64: /usr/lib/llvm-17/bin/llc: error: unable to get target for 'unknown', see --version and --triple.

2024-09-09 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi, On 2024-08-15 10:46, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > /usr/lib/llvm-17/include/clang/Basic/TokenKinds.def:23:26: error: pasting > "kw_" and "[" does not give a valid preprocessing token >23 | #define KEYWORD(X,Y) TOK(kw_ ## X) This is a LLVM 17 / GCC 14 regression: https://bugs.debian.org/10770

Bug#1080974: kf6-ktexttemplate: FTBFS on arm64 with gcc-14 and optimization level 2

2024-09-06 Thread Emanuele Rocca
On 2024-09-06 10:04, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > The problem seems to be a GCC 14 regression, given that with GCC 13 and > optimization level -O2 the build is fine. The issue seems related to the new optimization pass to fuse loads and stores to adjacent memory locations into load and stor

Bug#1080974: kf6-ktexttemplate: FTBFS on arm64 with gcc-14 and optimization level 2

2024-09-06 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: kf6-ktexttemplate Version: 6.5.0-2 Tags: sid trixie User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: arm64 X-Debbugs-Cc: Aurélien COUDERC When building kf6-ktexttemplate on arm64 with gcc-14 and -O2, the build fails due to the following build-time tests segfaulting: 2 - testbuiltins

Bug#1077068: llvm-toolchain-17 FTBFS with gcc-14 on arm64

2024-08-29 Thread Emanuele Rocca
On 2024-07-25 08:52, NoisyCoil wrote: > llvm-toolchain-17 fails to build from source with gcc-14 on arm64 due to this > upstream bug: > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/78691. A fix was merged to v18 > (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78704), but AFAICS the patch was > not ba

Bug#1079175: python3-pkg-resources: pkg_resources cannot be imported: No module named 'packaging'

2024-08-21 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Bonjour Cyril, On 2024-08-20 11:45, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > I couldn't replicate the FTBFS within a devel sid chroot that has tons of > extra packages, including python3-packaging, and python3-platformdirs, but > not python3-jaraco.text. Could it be that your sid chroot has an older version of

Bug#1079175: python3-pkg-resources: pkg_resources cannot be imported: No module named 'packaging'

2024-08-20 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Package: python3-pkg-resources Version: 72.2.0-1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: debian-b...@lists.debian.org [debian-boot added to CC as this issue breaks d-i builds] Importing pkg_resources fails with the following error: (sid-amd64-sbuild)ema@ariel:~$ python3 Python 3.12.5 (main, Aug 7 2

Bug#1078916: rr crashes on aarch64 ARM Cortex-A53

2024-08-20 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi Bernhard, On 2024-08-17 05:49, Bernhard Übelacker wrote: > If pointer authentication is not part of the arm64 baseline, > maybe the package isa-support should provide a package > which rr can depend on, like it does to sse2-support at i386? Basic pointer authentication instructions are defined

Bug#727343: chise-base: diff for NMU version 0.3.0-2.5

2024-08-19 Thread Emanuele Rocca
ainer upload. + * Call dh_autoreconf to update config.{sub,guess} and aclocal.m4. +Closes: #727343 + + -- Emanuele Rocca Mon, 19 Aug 2024 14:26:02 + + chise-base (0.3.0-2.4) unstable; urgency=medium * Non-maintainer upload. diff -Nru chise-base-0.3.0/debian/rules chise-base-0.3.0/d

Bug#1078808: pytorch: FTBFS: eval_frame.c:948:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘THP_PyFrame_Clear’

2024-08-16 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: pytorch Version: 2.1.2+dfsg-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-impfuncdef Dear Maintainer, pytorch fails to build from source with the following errors: /<>/torch/csrc/dynamo/eval_frame.c: In function ‘eval_custom_code’: /<>/to

Bug#1078795: python3-torch: Unsatisfied dependencies: python3 (< 3.12) but 3.12.5-1 is to be installed

2024-08-16 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Package: python3-torch Version: 2.1.2+dfsg-4 Severity: serious Hi, python3-torch cannot be installed in sid: (sid-amd64-sbuild)ema@ariel:/$ sudo apt install python3-torch Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using

Bug#1055211: bookworm-pu: package gcc-12/12.2.0-14+deb12u1 (CVE-2023-4039)

2024-08-16 Thread Emanuele Rocca
On 2024-06-22 08:48, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > This one will be to late for 12.6 bookworm point release, but maybe we > can try to have it for the august bookworm point release? Or are there > concerns about regressions? No specific concerns. The changes are all in the upstream branch releases

Bug#1077512: bind9: If there is any options removed in the package should be not added as unattended upgrades

2024-07-29 Thread Emanuele Leuzzi
2:26:30 xxx named[3063010]: loading configuration: failure Jul 25 12:26:30 xxx named[3063010]: exiting (due to fatal error) Jul 25 12:26:30 xxx systemd[1]: named.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE -- Emanuele Leuzzi Reti & Sistemi SSIS - Società Servizi Informati

Bug#1076580: dxvk: Use amd64 flags on 64 bit architectures, i386 flags otherwise

2024-07-19 Thread Emanuele Rocca
64 bit architectures, i686-w64-mingw32-objcopy on 32 bits. * Do not override DEB_HOST_GNU_CPU in d/strip_debug.sh, use a new variable instead. I have implemented the changes he suggested, please find a patch attached. Emanuele diff -Nru dxvk-2.4/debian/changelog dxvk-2.4/debian/changelog

Bug#1070446: rocm-hipamd: arm64 FTBFS with glibc 2.38

2024-07-19 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi, On 2024-07-18 11:45, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > With glibc 2.39, the revert is not possible anymore, therefore I > rocm-hipamd FTBFS again. I have therefore upgraded the severity to > serious. > > Emanuele Rocca is working on a solution on the upstream LLVM side. In > the mean

Bug#1076578: llvm-toolchain-17: Make SVE types available in device targets

2024-07-19 Thread Emanuele Rocca
! Emanuele From: Emanuele Rocca Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 09:25:38 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] [Clang] make SVE types known to device targets too (#99446) For the purpose of preprocessing and declarations in header files, ensure clang accepts SVE types for both device and host targets. Co-authored-by

Bug#1076160: g++: _Float16 does not work in G++ (works in GCC) on aarch64

2024-07-15 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi, I could reproduce the problem with GCC 12 on aarch64, but not with GCC 13 and 14. Using the following test program: #include float test(_Float16 x){ return x; } int main() { printf("%f\n", test(1.0)); } This is the error message you get on aarch64 with g++-12: $

Bug#1075814: plotpy: Fails to build on arm64

2024-07-15 Thread Emanuele Rocca
come up with a fix. It seems that they will be shipping it as part of the upcoming 2.4.2 release. To see if the proposed patch actually works for us, I've quilt-imported [2], added python3-skimage to Build-Depends, and verified that indeed the package builds fine on arm64 again.

Bug#1076205: aspectc++: Please upgrade to llvm-toolchain-18

2024-07-12 Thread Emanuele Rocca
. Thanks, Emanuele

Bug#1063515: glibc: Please build with -mbranch-protection=standard on arm64 to enable PAC/BTI support

2024-07-10 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi, On 2024-02-09 11:36, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > In order to properly support PAC/BTI in Debian we need first GCC to > enable support for the feature, and that has not happened yet. PAC/BTI support is now turned on in GCC starting with 13.3.0-2. I have tried a glibc rebuild in sid wi

Bug#1055711: Bug#1057469: gcc-13: Please build gcc with -mbranch-protection=standard to fix PAC/BTI support on arm64

2024-07-04 Thread Emanuele Rocca
On 2024-07-01 03:12, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > I haven't tested it on cross-builds of the native compiler as that > currently fails due to unsatisfied dependencies in sid. That case > should work fine too though. Double-checked today, cross-builds of the native compiler work as well

Bug#1055711: Bug#1057469: gcc-13: Please build gcc with -mbranch-protection=standard to fix PAC/BTI support on arm64

2024-07-01 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi Matthias, you can find an updated patch attached, it allows to disable the flag by building with DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS=hardening=-branch. It does the right thing on libgcc-13-dev built on arm64 as well as libgcc-13-dev-arm64-cross built on amd64. I haven't tested it on cross-builds of the na

Bug#1073188: dxvk: FTBFS on arm64 due to x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc using -mbranch-protection=standard

2024-06-14 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Control: tags -1 + patch On 2024-06-14 10:42, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > stderr: x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option > ‘-mbranch-protection=standard’ Please consider applying the attached patch to fix this FTBFS bug by using CFLAGS as defined for amd64 instead of

Bug#1073188: dxvk: FTBFS on arm64 due to x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc using -mbranch-protection=standard

2024-06-14 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: dxvk Version: 2.3.1-1 Severity: serious User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: pac-bti dxvk fails to build from source on arm64 due to the aarch64-specific compiler flag -mbranch-protection=standard leaking into CFLAGS used by x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc: meson.build:1:0: ERROR: Unable t

Bug#1073045: elfutils: test failures are ignored

2024-06-12 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Source: elfutils Version: 0.191-1 Severity: important All test failures during make check are ignored, see the following line in debian/rules: -LC_CTYPE=C $(MAKE) check $(USE_JOBS) || { cat tests/test-suite.log; exit 1; } Please drop the initial hyphen to ensure that the build fails in case of

Bug#1070853: strace: test failures on 32bit with 64bit time_t

2024-06-06 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hello! On 2024-06-06 12:48, Bo YU wrote: > hmm, here I use libdw-dev instead of libunwind-dev as upstream > suggested. I just have uploaded it to mentor because my mentor did not > respond to me for a while. Could you help me to try to build it on > arm64 or armhf again? I have tested it on qemu-u

Bug#1070853: strace: test failures on 32bit with 64bit time_t

2024-06-05 Thread Emanuele Rocca
tps://salsa.debian.org/debian/strace/-/commit/711a9970c553b8fb9a5b9eb3a4b80600eb8112c4 With the attached patch strace builds fine on arm64 and armhf. Cheers, Emanuele diff -Nru strace-6.8/debian/changelog strace-6.8/debian/changelog --- strace-6.8/debian/changelog 2024-05-10 06:53:53.0 +0

Bug#1072574: kernel-wedge: Enable Renesas RZ/G3S and RZ/V2H boards

2024-06-05 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi, On 2024-06-04 04:17, John wrote: > CONFIG_ARCH_R9A09G057=y #RZ/V2H Just a note to mention that this setting is being added in Linux 6.10, we will have to wait for such version to be packaged before enabling it.

Bug#1072004: linux: regression in the 9p protocol in 6.8 breaks autopkgtest qemu jobs (affecting debci)

2024-05-30 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hi, On 2024-05-30 12:00, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 29.05.24 23:12, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > > On 2024-05-27 02:31, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >> Would also help a lot to know if this is a 6.8.y only thing, or happens > >> with 6.9 and mainline as well, as 6.8.

Bug#1068157: siridb-server: FTBFS on armhf: ./test.sh: line 18: 3276877 Segmentation fault valgrind --tool=memcheck --error-exitcode=1 --leak-check=full -q ./$OUT

2024-05-30 Thread Emanuele Rocca
sources.debian.org/src/siridb-server/2.0.51-3/debian/control/#L18 FTR I am tracking these problems with a usertag: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-...@lists.debian.org;tag=32bit-stackclash Emanuele

Bug#1039883: The issue impacts SSD disks as well

2024-05-30 Thread Emanuele Rocca
Hey, On 2023-11-05 04:12, Hervé Werner wrote: > I faced this issue on real data but I struggled to find a reliable scenario > to reproduce it. Here is what I just came up with: > sudo mkfs -t ext4 -O fast_commit,inline_data /dev/sdb > sudo mount /dev/sdb /mnt/ > sudo install -d -o myuser /m

Bug#1072004: linux: regression in the 9p protocol in 6.8 breaks autopkgtest qemu jobs (affecting debci)

2024-05-29 Thread Emanuele Rocca
e: qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu host -machine accel=kvm -drive file=sid.img,format=qcow2 -m 4G -smp `nproc` Upgrade the kernel, and run the autopkgtest again as above. Emanuele

Bug#1070654: xfsprogs: Build with PAC/BTI support on arm64

2024-05-06 Thread Emanuele Rocca
turned on, see attached patch. Thanks, Emanuele [1] https://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/PACBTI diff -Nru xfsprogs-6.5.0/debian/rules xfsprogs-6.5.0/debian/rules --- xfsprogs-6.5.0/debian/rules 2023-08-15 21:15:28.0 +0200 +++ xfsprogs-6.5.0/debian/rules 2024-02-12 15:51:07.0 +0100

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >