Bug#1106216: Acknowledgement (unblock: raku-license-spdx/3.18.0-5)

2025-05-21 Thread Dominique Dumont
05-08 16:25:11.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +raku-license-spdx (3.18.0-5) unstable; urgency=medium + + * control: add Build-Depends on dh_raku 0.19 + * control: set arch=all + + -- Dominique Dumont Thu, 08 May 2025 16:25:11 +0200 + raku-license-spdx (3.18.0-4) unstable; urgency=medium

Bug#1106216: unblock: raku-license-spdx/3.18.0-5

2025-05-21 Thread Dominique Dumont
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package raku-license-spdx [ Reason ] The version of this package in testing provides: - source files - pre-compiled binary files The pre-compiled binary files depends on rak

Bug#1106214: unblock: raku-meta6/0.0.30-4

2025-05-21 Thread Dominique Dumont
urgency=medium + + * control: add Build-Depends on dh_raku 0.19 + * control: set arch=all + + -- Dominique Dumont Thu, 08 May 2025 16:25:15 +0200 + raku-meta6 (0.0.30-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Set architectures supported by moarvm diff -Nru raku-meta6-0.0.30/debian/control raku-meta6-0.0.30

Bug#1106110: unblock: raku-json-class/0.0.21-4

2025-05-20 Thread Dominique Dumont
Sorry, the relevant bug is https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1104467

Bug#1106110: unblock: raku-json-class/0.0.21-4

2025-05-19 Thread Dominique Dumont
* control: set arch=all + + -- Dominique Dumont Thu, 08 May 2025 16:24:54 +0200 + +raku-json-class (0.0.21-3) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Set architectures supported by moarvm + + -- Dominique Dumont Mon, 28 Apr 2025 10:05:12 +0200 + +raku-json-class (0.0.21-2) unstable; urgency=medium + + *

Bug#1104972: RM: dh-perl6 -- ROM; Obsolete, superseded by dh-raku

2025-05-09 Thread Dominique Dumont
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: dh-pe...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:dh-perl6 User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove Since the rename of Perl6 to Raku, we've replaced dh-perl6 by dh-raku. That was in 2021, and all usages of dh-perl6 are

Bug#1103962: RM: raku [arm64 armel armhf] -- ROM; depends on moarvm which is not provided on arm*

2025-04-23 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 09:34:34 + (UTC) Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > I am not really sure why you request the removal of an arch:all package from a specific architecture. I admit I'm quite confused about the removal from specific arch process. Anyway, I logged this bug because https://tracker.d

Bug#1103974: planner: wrong homepage URL in control file

2025-04-23 Thread Dominique Dumont
Source: planner Version: 0.14.92-1 Severity: minor Dear Maintainer, When running $ apt show planner I get: Homepage: https://wiki.gnome.org/action/show/Apps/Planner Which is invalid. The correct URL is https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Planner Could you fix your control file ? All the best --

Bug#1103962: RM: raku [arm64 armel armhf] -- ROM; depends on moarvm which is not provided on arm*

2025-04-23 Thread Dominique Dumont
Hi On Wednesday, 23 April 2025 10:11:46 Central European Summer Time Emanuele Rocca wrote: > On 2025-04-23 09:55, Dominique Dumont wrote: > > Currently, moarvm and nqp packages have a bug on arm that can't be > > reproduced. This bug triggers a random crash and can trip buil

Bug#1103962: RM: raku [arm64 armel armhf] -- ROM; depends on moarvm which is not provided on arm*

2025-04-23 Thread Dominique Dumont
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: r...@packages.debian.org, debian-...@lists.debian.org, debian-...@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:raku User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: arm64 armel armhf User: deb

Bug#1103736: RM: prove6 [arm64 armel armhf] -- ROM; depends on moarvm which is not provided on arm*

2025-04-21 Thread Dominique Dumont
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: pro...@packages.debian.org, debian-...@lists.debian.org, debian-...@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:prove6 User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: arm64 armel armhf User:

Bug#1099928: Pending autoremoval of moarvm (Was: Bug#1099928: src:moarvm: fails to migrate to testing for too long)

2025-04-18 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Friday, 18 April 2025 11:34:55 Central European Summer Time you wrote: > I found the answer which is yes. I was wrong. The problems comes from all raku modules package which are Architecture: any. (sigh.. they used to be arch all). Anyway, all these packages (19) must be removed from all arm

Bug#1101988: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: scan-copyrights crashes on rustc

2025-04-08 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Monday, 7 April 2025 16:08:16 Central European Summer Time Walter Lozano wrote: > Thank you! I have skipped the problematic files in my setup, but I was I > wanted to share this with you in case you have a better approach. On second thought, we can assume that a corrupted file would be upstrea

Bug#1101994: libconfig-model-itself-perl: (autopkg)test failures with Path::Tiny 0.148

2025-04-06 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Sunday, 6 April 2025 18:14:32 Central European Summer Time you wrote: > Is it possible that you haven't pushed your changes to the salsa > repo? Arg... yes... sorry about that. I've just pushed my changes. All the best

Bug#1101989: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: scan-copyrights crashes on eslint

2025-04-05 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Thursday, 3 April 2025 18:03:59 Central European Summer Time you wrote: > While running scan-copyrights on eslint the following error is triggered: > > malformed JSON string, neither tag, array, object, number, string or atom, > at character offset 0 (before "\x{feff}{\n"priv...") at > /usr

Bug#1101988: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: scan-copyrights crashes on rustc

2025-04-05 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Thursday, 3 April 2025 17:32:26 Central European Summer Time you wrote: > toml syntax error on line 6ensecheck > -->| invalid-value > > This seems to be caused by the following files which are part of internal > test with invalid data: > > - src/tools/cargo/tests/testsuite/cargo_add/in

Bug#1101987: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: scan-copyrights crashes on dulwich

2025-04-05 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Thursday, 3 April 2025 17:27:52 Central European Summer Time you wrote: > Jelmer Vernooij vs Jelmer Vernooij, note ij vs ij, making the merge of > copyrights fail. Bugs comes from Sofware::Copyright where I used NFKD function instead of NFC. I'll fix this upstream. All the best

Bug#1101994: libconfig-model-itself-perl: (autopkg)test failures with Path::Tiny 0.148

2025-04-04 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Thursday, 3 April 2025 19:26:19 Central European Summer Time you wrote: > Source: libconfig-model-itself-perl > Version: 2.023-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs trixie sid > Justification: we love autopkgtests; blocks libpath-tiny-perl's migration It's indeed an issue with new version of Path

Bug#1100183: RM: nqp [arm64 armel armhf] -- ROM; depends on moarvm which is not provided on arm*

2025-04-02 Thread Dominique Dumont
Hi On Wednesday, 12 March 2025 13:28:24 Central European Summer Time Dominique Dumont wrote: > moarvm was removed from testing and unstable on arm*. Now nqp and > rakudo must also be removed. Any news on this removal request ? All the best

Bug#1101404: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: Odd reordering of control fields

2025-03-27 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Thursday, 27 March 2025 02:45:09 Central European Standard Time you wrote: > I had been seeing an odd order for fields in several packages I've > been fixing lately and was wondering what had caused those. Today > after seeing a commit with tool attribution I realized it was > «cme fix» performi

Bug#1101401: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: Strange «Debian GNU» fixer

2025-03-27 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Thursday, 27 March 2025 02:23:44 Central European Standard Time you wrote: > I've been noticing and fixing lately several packages where they had > instances of «Debian GNU» which looked rather odd. I just realized now > that it looks like «cme fix» might have introduced those! Indeed. > I thi

Bug#1100183: RM: nqp [arm64 armel armhf] -- ROM; depends on moarvm which is not provided on arm*

2025-03-12 Thread Dominique Dumont
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: n...@packages.debian.org, debian-...@lists.debian.org, debian-...@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:nqp User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: arm64 armel armhf User: debi

Bug#1100185: RM: rakudo [arm64 armel armhf] -- ROM; depends on moarvm which is not provided on arm*

2025-03-12 Thread Dominique Dumont
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: rak...@packages.debian.org, debian-...@lists.debian.org, debian-...@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:rakudo User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: arm64 armel armhf User:

Bug#1099940: RM: moarvm [arm64 armel armhf] -- ROM; package cannot be built reliably on all arm arches

2025-03-09 Thread Dominique Dumont
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: moa...@packages.debian.org, debian-...@lists.debian.org, debian-...@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:moarvm User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: arm64 armel armhf User:

Bug#1073595: libuv1 1.49.2 in unstable soon?

2025-02-03 Thread Dominique Dumont
Hi On Saturday 1 February 2025 23:12:43 CET you wrote: > I saw that there is libuv1 1.49.2 in experimental. > May I know whether the plan is to have it in unstable/testing soon? > Bug 1073595 has been blocking works on ocaml-luv and haxe. I've uploaded 1.50.0 in unstable. All the best

Bug#1093586: libuv1: new upstream release with uv_udp_try_send2 (1.50.0)

2025-01-25 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 09:26:28 +0100 Ondřej Surý wrote: > Could you > please update the version in unstable, so this end up in trixie. We hope this > could give the BIND 9 a boost in authoritative performance as it will avoid > the uv_udp_send() callbacks and still use sendmmsg() internally. Unfo

Bug#1092950: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: scan-copyrights fails on util-linux

2025-01-19 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 16:05:15 -0300 Walter Lozano wrote: > As a workaround I have used > [snip] > > but hopefully you will provide a better solution. Thanks for the suggestion. I've done a similar modification to fix this problem. All the best

Bug#1091179: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: scan-copyrigths fails on texlive-extra

2024-12-27 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Thursday, 26 December 2024 13:52:02 CET Walter Lozano wrote: > I see, thanks for clarifying. I wonder if there is a kind of > specification which mentions that copyright notice should be utf-8 or if > it is just the common case. AFAIK, there's no specification. But this makes licensecheck and c

Bug#1091179: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: scan-copyrigths fails on texlive-extra

2024-12-23 Thread Dominique Dumont
Hi This failure is due to a combination of issues. Some author of texlive-extra got creative to specify their copyright years: - 2023 -20** by Romain NOEL - 2011-.. Maïeul Rouquette This leads to error when parsing copyright ranges and this triggers the error you've seen. I'll change Softwar

Bug#1088669: nqp: diff for NMU version 2024.09+dfsg-2.1

2024-12-01 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Saturday, 30 November 2024 12:04:41 CET Timo Paulssen wrote: > Dear Gianfranco, I will have to ask you to delay, or maybe cancel, this > NMU. Please read on if you would like to know the reasoning: Timo, I think Gianfranco is not subscribed to pkg-rakudo-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net, so he pr

Bug#1086555: rakudo: FTBFS on arm: build hangs sometimes

2024-11-02 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Friday, 1 November 2024 12:53:38 CET Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > This is preventing the ongoing transition from completing. Just retrying the > build until it happens to finish is not a good solution in case future > updates need to happen, particularly for security updates. Agreed. I'll l

Bug#1086189: transition: rakudo

2024-10-30 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Tuesday, 29 October 2024 09:09:41 CET you wrote: > Go ahead. Done. Thanks for the quick reply All the best

Bug#1086189: transition: rakudo

2024-10-28 Thread Dominique Dumont
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: rak...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:rakudo User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi rakudo and its sibling packages (moarvm and nqp) have an API that change at every release. This requires a re

Bug#1079401: magic-wormhole: wormhole is unusable due to failed import

2024-10-09 Thread Dominique Dumont
Confirmed. wormhole is also broken on my system. Note that upstream version is now 0.16.0 All the best

Bug#1078153: pan: please make the build reproducible

2024-08-31 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Saturday, 31 August 2024 12:15:14 CEST you wrote: > That would indeed be reproducible, but it has a few problems in that > it make the patch not upstreamable, and it also might be misleading on > Ubuntu (or any other Debian-derivative). That's a good point. Ok, then I'll apply this patch upstr

Bug#1078153: pan: please make the build reproducible

2024-08-30 Thread Dominique Dumont
Hi If that's ok with you, I'll set PLATFORM_INFO to "Debian" when SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is set. This way, as upstream, I have a better hint of the origin of Pan when a user reports a bug. Thanks for the report. All the best On Wednesday, 7 August 2024 15:00:14 CEST you wrote: > Source: pan > Ver

Bug#1054029: rakudo: Please add support for "loong64"

2024-08-23 Thread Dominique Dumont
Hello On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 11:57:36 + wuruilong wrote: > I have verified that the attached patch can be successfully compiled into a package on the loongarch architecture, please merge the patch. I've stepped down from rakudo maintenance. Unfortunately, there's no volunteer to take over. I

Bug#1075762: Remove deprecated XS-Ruby-Versions: all and XB-Ruby-Versions: ${ruby:Versions}

2024-07-07 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 19:41:53 +0530 Praveen Arimbrathodiyil wrote: > XS-Ruby-Versions: all and XB-Ruby-Versions: ${ruby:Versions} are > deprecated so cme/routine-update should remove those fields. Are these parameters replaced by another parameter ? Or should I simply drop them ? All the best

Bug#1004135: plantuml: please update to a newer upstream version

2024-07-03 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 11:29:15 + Dimitrij Mijoski wrote: > The latest upstream version now is v1.2024.5. I use plantuml for work, I'll help on this package. Andrei, could you push your latest modification to salsa ? All the best

Bug#1073595: Missing symbols in the library file compared to the headers

2024-06-25 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 08:56:43 +0200 julien.pu...@gmail.com wrote: > After some poking around, they are declared in /usr/include/uv.h, but > using objdump -T on /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libuv.so.1.0.0 doesn't > show them. This will be fixed upstream. Can you wait for next libuv upstream release ?

Bug#1072334: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: add loong64 and riscv64 to available archs

2024-06-02 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Sunday, 2 June 2024 02:53:49 CEST you wrote: > On Sat, 01 Jun 2024 08:45:03 +, Francesco Ballarin wrote: > > is it possible to add loong64 and riscv64 to the archs listed in > > /usr/share/perl5/Config/Model/Dpkg/Dependency.pm > > ? > > Maybe we should use (in lib/Config/Model/Dpkg/Dependen

Bug#1054028: (no subject)

2024-05-25 Thread Dominique Dumont
Hello Thanks for your work. Unfortunately, I've stepped down from rakudo maintenance, and nobody stepped up to replace me. I guess that your patch will be merged once a new maintainer is found for rakudo. All the best

Bug#1069753: libuv1: y2k38 known upstream issue on 32-bits archs

2024-04-24 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Wednesday, 24 April 2024 09:48:55 CEST you wrote: > on 32-bits archs, nodejs fails some y2k38 tests. > > It is a well-known issue that has been fixed in libuv master branch, > https://github.com/libuv/libuv/issues/3864 > but might not be fixed anytime soon in 1.x branch. > > Indeed, fixing it

Bug#1069247: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: test failures

2024-04-22 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Sunday, 21 April 2024 18:07:00 CEST Julian Andres Klode wrote: > This should be fixed in apt git already, just needs an upload, > which is waiting-ish for some more merges Given [1], I need to ask... Is this a definitive fix or will this feature come back with apt 3.0 ? All the best [1] ht

Bug#1069247: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: test failures

2024-04-20 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Thursday, 18 April 2024 19:21:55 CEST you wrote: > Source: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl > Version: 3.004 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > Justification: fails to build from source This really looks like a bug with prove: $ perl t/reorder.t ok 1 - test re-ordered list 1..1 $ prove -l -v -

Bug#1063484: libuv1: CVE-2024-24806

2024-03-07 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Wednesday, 6 March 2024 21:07:56 CET Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Thank you very much. Looks good to me, feel free to upload as well to > security-master (and build as well with -sa). Done. All the best

Bug#1063484: libuv1: CVE-2024-24806

2024-03-03 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 21:53:07 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > libuv1 is as well affected in bullseye and it's still supported. Can > you have a look as well at this version? The same patch (with a refresh) applies to bullseye. I can also prepare an upload. All the best

Bug#1063484: libuv1: CVE-2024-24806

2024-02-14 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Thu, 08 Feb 2024 20:51:30 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Note, that the advisory at [1] mentions that affected versions are > only > 1.45.x. Looking at the git changes, is it not introduced after > 6dd44caa35b4 ("unix,win: support IDNA 2008 in uv_getaddrinfo()") in > v1.24.0? The advisor

Bug#1055937: lcdproc: package is missing files and functionalities

2023-12-06 Thread Dominique Dumont
Hi On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 09:00:11 -0500 Frederic wrote: > Package is missing files and functionalities about USB Yes, some usb drivers were removed a while ago because they use a deprecated libusb. > Problem #1 > Locally merge PR #200 and #201 (especially #201 for USB interface) No. I'll wait

Bug#1057567: libconfig-model-lcdproc-perl: FTBFS: Cannot determine local time zone

2023-12-06 Thread Dominique Dumont
Hi On Tuesday, 5 December 2023 23:06:12 CET you wrote: > Wrote documentation in lib/Config/Model/models/LCDd/yard2LCD.pod Cannot > determine local time zone > [DZ] beginning to build Config-Model-LcdProc I've seen this error from time to time. I don't know the exact algorithm used to determine t

Bug#1057335: libperl-languageserver-perl: language server exits on error with «Can't "continue" outside a when block»

2023-12-03 Thread Dominique Dumont
Package: libperl-languageserver-perl Version: 2.6.1-2 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, With the latest package, the language server always exits on error with: Can't "continue" outside a when block at /usr/share/perl5/Perl/LanguageServer/Parser.pm line 181. I'm using perl language server v

Bug#1057007: libconfig-model-tkui-perl: autopkgtest for libconfig-model-itself-perl fails with libconfig-model-tkui-perl 1.377

2023-12-02 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Saturday, 2 December 2023 12:32:02 CET you wrote: > Git bisect shows that the following commit leads to the loop: > > https://github.com/dod38fr/config-model-tk-ui/commit/b3bd74328e3ded903790ee8 > 042699821a8d10bf4 Fixed upstream in v1.378

Bug#1057007: libconfig-model-tkui-perl: autopkgtest for libconfig-model-itself-perl fails with libconfig-model-tkui-perl 1.377

2023-12-02 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Saturday, 2 December 2023 12:05:54 CET Dominique Dumont wrote: > With TkUI, a loop may be hard to spot as callback function are likely to be > involved. Git bisect shows that the following commit leads to the loop: https://github.com/dod38fr/config-model-tk-ui/

Bug#1057007: libconfig-model-tkui-perl: autopkgtest for libconfig-model-itself-perl fails with libconfig-model-tkui-perl 1.377

2023-12-02 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Monday, 27 November 2023 21:53:07 CET you wrote: > I'm sorry I don't even have an idea where this is showing a problem, > much less what that may be caused by.. :-/ No worry. This tests shows that there's a loop in the data structure reference (See https://metacpan.org/pod/Test::Memory::Cycle

Bug#1054981: libtk-objeditor-perl: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j8 test TEST_VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

2023-10-29 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Sunday, 29 October 2023 01:09:21 CET you wrote: > This seems to be broken by libtk-objscanner-perl 2.018-1 (building in > a testing chroot with 2.017-2 still works). > > Dominique, I think that's a case for you :) ack. I'll handle it upstream. No need to open a bug there. All the best

Bug#1001045: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: scan-copyright reports empty license

2023-10-20 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 18:26:12 +0200 Dominique Dumont wrote: > Then I would suggest to override the license information reported by licensecheck. > > For details, please see > > https://github.com/dod38fr/config-model/wiki/Updating-debian-copyright-file-with-cme#filling-miss

Bug#1053888: dh-dist-zilla: does not run 'dzil clean' on dh_clean

2023-10-13 Thread Dominique Dumont
Package: dh-dist-zilla Version: 1.4.1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, Due to bug #1049036, I have to run cleanup files generated by dzil build. These files are handled upstream by this config in dist.ini: [Run::Clean] run = rm -rf lib/Config/Model/models/ Unfortunately, "dzil clean" is not c

Bug#1017581: Please install documentation

2023-09-25 Thread Dominique Dumont
Hi Sorry for the late reply. On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 00:01:36 +0100 Ian Jackson wrote: > It would be ncie to install this documentation somewhere suitable. As > manpages would be ideal, assuming the .rst files are suitable for > that, but HTML in /usr/share/doc/ would do nicely as well. libuv doc

Bug#1052168: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: maps @copyright{} to no-info-found

2023-09-20 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 18:26:45 +0200 Andreas Metzler wrote: > something in libconfig-model-dpkg-perl seems to have changed, when > upgrading guile-gnutls with "cme update dpkg-copyright" the generated > file moved from > > Files: doc/gnutls-guile.texi > Copyright: @copyright{} 2001-2023, Free Softw

Bug#1010604: Support commonly used providers like github.com and gitlab.com within watch file

2023-09-13 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Tue, 13 Sep 2022 18:05:23 +0200 Bastian Germann wrote: > Now the release pages of both Gitlab and GitHub generate their hrefs via > JavaScript which kills uscan for them. > See #1019696. They should both have an API to handle this. Github has such an API. For instance, here's a call that ret

Bug#1001045: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: scan-copyright reports empty license

2023-06-17 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 14:24:24 +0530 Vignesh Raman wrote: > Have reported the bug in licensecheck - http://bugs.debian.org/1001615 Looks like this bug won't be fixed in licensecheck. Then I would suggest to override the license information reported by licensecheck. For details, please see htt

Bug#1033406: licensecheck: scan-copyrights fails to create copyright file for texlive-extra

2023-05-03 Thread Dominique Dumont
Hi Sorry for the late reply On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 19:07:05 +0530 Vignesh Raman wrote: > Yes. I'm getting the same error messages. You should have begun with a copy of the error messages you got. I've spent quite some time wondering out what could wrong. Well, let's bygones be bygones. This pr

Bug#1033406: licensecheck: scan-copyrights fails to create copyright file for texlive-extra

2023-04-02 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 08:15:44 +0530 Vignesh Raman wrote: > Could you please look into this issue with the details provided? Thank you. With the setup you mentionned, I get this error message: Invalid year range: 2012-11-06 at /home/domi/private/debian-dev/perl-stuff/libconfig-model-dpkg-perl/li

Bug#1029588: bts: Changes in libio-socket-ssl-perl 2.078 make bts fail to send mail to mail-server via SSL/TLS - hostname verification failed

2023-04-01 Thread Dominique Dumont
Hi I've created a merge request [1] on devscript to fix this issue All the best [1] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/devscripts/-/merge_requests/343

Bug#1029588: bts: Changes in libio-socket-ssl-perl 2.078 make bts fail to send mail to mail-server via SSL/TLS - hostname verification failed

2023-03-29 Thread Dominique Dumont
Hello Turns out that Perl module Net::SMTP supports SSL since 2014 [1], but bts still use Net::SMTPS which is an old wrapper around Net::SMTP. I've patched bts to use Net::SMTP instead of Net::STMPS and I can connect to Daniel's server: $ perl -MDevel::SimpleTrace scripts/bts.pl --smtp-host sm

Bug#1033406: licensecheck: scan-copyrights fails to create copyright file for texlive-extra

2023-03-26 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 21:22:33 +0530 Vignesh Raman wrote: > Only when we run scan-copyrights with all the source files, it crashes. With texlive-extra-2022.20230122 source, scan-copyright emits some warnings but does not fail. Could you try scan-copyright on your side by running this command in

Bug#1029588: bts: Changes in libio-socket-ssl-perl 2.078 make bts fail to send mail to mail-server via SSL/TLS - hostname verification failed

2023-03-25 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 15:22:34 +0100 Lee Garrett wrote: > While this setup might work for some people, this has IMHO quite a few hefty > drawbacks and requires me to maintain a MTA on my local machine. I could > elaborate, but I don't think it's on-topic for this bug report. Agreed. > I'm sure t

Bug#1029588: bts: Changes in libio-socket-ssl-perl 2.078 make bts fail to send mail to mail-server via SSL/TLS - hostname verification failed

2023-03-18 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 22:21:26 +0100 Lee Garrett wrote: > Bumped severity as this makes bts currently unusable, and probably > breaks for quite a few DDs their workflow. This does not break on my system where bts is connected to local sendmail (which is the default setup). Which hints at a worka

Bug#1027686: Rakudo transition is stuck ?

2023-01-20 Thread Dominique Dumont
Hi Nothing is happening in rakudo transition [1], no package are rebuilt. Is there a way to unblock this transition ? All the best [1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/rakudo.html

Bug#1027686: transition: rakudo

2023-01-18 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Wednesday, 18 January 2023 03:03:37 CET M. Zhou wrote: > I have uploaded moarvm, nqp, and rakudo to unstable. > They turned green on release architectures. > The ppc64el buildd lags a little bit but I believe the result will be > green as well based on the previous no-change build in experimenta

Bug#1027686: transition: rakudo

2023-01-15 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Sunday, 15 January 2023 15:21:55 CET Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > I've found where compiler-id is computed. I'm going patch rakudo in > > experimental so that compiler-id depends only on source files and nqp > > version. This patch will land in experimental. > > Okay, please let me know once i

Bug#1027686: transition: rakudo

2023-01-13 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 18:45:41 +0100 Dominique Dumont wrote: > > Can the computation of the ID be patched to be independent of the > > build path? > > I haven't figured out completely how this compiler-id is created. I've found where compiler-id is compute

Bug#1027686: transition: rakudo

2023-01-11 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Tuesday, 10 January 2023 11:21:32 CET Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > On 2023-01-09 13:54:08 -0500, M. Zhou wrote: > > I missed the detail that the compiler ID even changes for different > > architecture.. which may not be good. > > Is it required that the build path

Bug#1027686: transition: rakudo

2023-01-11 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Monday, 9 January 2023 19:54:08 CET M. Zhou wrote: > Is it possible for us to slightly modify the postinst script to > recompile the cache locally when the compiler id mismatches? I'd rather not. Untangling pre-compilation issues is hard enough. In case of problem I dont' want to wonder whethe

Bug#1027686: transition: rakudo

2023-01-07 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Saturday, 7 January 2023 11:58:29 CET you wrote: > > Unfortunately, the compiler-id also depends on the build directory. Which > > means that the compiler id changes between arches. > > This should be fixed first. Otherwise every rebuild of the compiler will > require all reverse dependencies t

Bug#1027686: transition: rakudo

2023-01-02 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Sunday, 1 January 2023 22:38:43 CET M. Zhou wrote: > Specifically, the pre-compiled cache shipped in reverse dependencies > relies on a matching compiler ID. Hence, we added the compiler ID into the > virtual package to ensure cache compatibility: raku-api-2022.12+e556a5c0 > The compiler ID will

Bug#1026984: Possible fix for pan crash

2022-12-29 Thread Dominique Dumont
Hi piorunz, could you try the fix proposed there: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pan/-/merge_requests/41 All the best Dod

Bug#1026984: Info received (Bug#1026984: Acknowledgement (pan: segfault when opening a newsgroup))

2022-12-26 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Sun, 25 Dec 2022 20:00:15 + piorunz wrote: > I've managed to download symbols and run gdb again: > > coredumpctl gdb 3417359 > bt > (32000+ lines omitted) > last 10 lines: This looks like a recursive call gone bad. Could you send me the whole backtrace ? All the best

Bug#1023576: Need to change the way raku-api is built (will breaks modules)

2022-11-19 Thread Dominique Dumont
Hi Following bug #1023576 and [1], the dependency between raku modules and rakudo version needs to be tightened. Until now, every raku-module depends on raku-api- (currently is raku-api-2022-07). The idea is to lock the pre-compiled files contained in a raku-module package to a specific rakudo

Bug#1023068: /usr/share/perl5/Config/Model/Dpkg/Dependency.pm: warning with perl 5.36

2022-10-30 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Saturday, 29 October 2022 23:15:05 CET you wrote: > Use of @_ in numeric gt (>) with signatured subroutine is experimental at > /usr/share/perl5/Config/Model/Dpkg/Dependency.pm line 344. A real bug was hidden there. Thanks for the heads-up

Bug#1022804: azure-cli: terraform fails due to azure-cli error: unexpected keyword argument 'allow_broker'

2022-10-26 Thread Dominique Dumont
Package: azure-cli Version: 2.41.0-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, With Debian's azure-cli, terraform authentication fails with the following error: $ terraform apply ╷ │ Error: obtaining Authorization Token from the Azure CLI: parsing json result from the Azure CLI: waiting for the Azure

Bug#1021773: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: tweak example in docs for fix.(scanned.)copyright does not work

2022-10-22 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Saturday, 22 October 2022 12:09:30 CEST you wrote: > Thank you. This does not throw an error, but does not work as expected > either: > (sid)ametzler@argenau:/tmp/GUILE-GNUTLS/guile-gnutls-3.7.9$ cat > debian/fix.scanned.copyright ! Files:"*" Copyright=~"s/, Free Software$/, > Free Software Foun

Bug#1021773: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: tweak example in docs for fix.(scanned.)copyright does not work

2022-10-19 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Friday, 14 October 2022 15:07:56 CEST you wrote: > The docs for Config::Model::Dpkg::Copyright list dthis example for > tweaking: > > ! Files:'*' Copyright=~s/\s*".*// Arg, I got it. This behavior is due to a limitation of Config::Model::Loader where only double quote can be used. He

Bug#1021773: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: tweak example in docs for fix.(scanned.)copyright does not work

2022-10-15 Thread Dominique Dumont
'Files:"'*'" Copyright' has a wrong value: > Undefined mandatory value. I've reproduced this message with a copyright that contains: Copyright: "2009-2011, Dominique Dumont " Note the quite at the beginning of the copyright statement. With thi

Bug#1021773: libconfig-model-dpkg-perl: tweak example in docs for fix.(scanned.)copyright does not work

2022-10-15 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Friday, 14 October 2022 15:07:56 CEST you wrote: > Note: loading debian/fix.scanned.copyright fixes from copyright fix files > Configuration item 'Dpkg::Copyright' has a user error: > Error while applying fix.scanned.copyright file: > Configuration item 'Files:"'*'" Copyright' ha

Bug#1020898: Uninstallable due to file conflict A37F26876B58371B70EDD889AD69F064C90AC2C6

2022-10-02 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 12:17:48 +0200 Dominique Dumont wrote: > I'll have to reach out to upstream to investigate. I've a fix from upstream for rakudo package. The fix is added in rakudo 2020.07-2 I need to re-upload the affected module packages to depend on that version of r

Bug#1020898: Uninstallable due to file conflict A37F26876B58371B70EDD889AD69F064C90AC2C6

2022-09-28 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Wednesday, 28 September 2022 10:39:57 CEST Guillem Jover wrote: > [ Filing against all affected packages because it's not clear to me which > one needs to be fixed. ] > > These packages all contain (at least) these same filenames: > > ,--- > perl6-readline: > /usr/lib/perl6/vendor/precom

Bug#1020788: dh-raku: Failed to create directory '/sbuild-nonexistent/.raku/short'

2022-09-27 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 21:26:45 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: dh-raku > Version: 0.13 I knew this was not a good version number ;-) I'll fix this soon. Thanks for the report. All the best

Bug#1019579: raku-json-unmarshal: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/perl6/vendor/precomp/C847F303DB03DE97DCB92EFEE90C0526E0D4FDF0/C1/C1DA909DAD9BF713751A74EBF038C545A1EA6ECC', which is also in package rak

2022-09-23 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Mon, 12 Sep 2022 17:21:45 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote: > Unpacking raku-json-unmarshal (0.10-1) ... > dpkg: error processing archive /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-Kxnez1/92-raku-json- unmarshal_0.10-1_arm64.deb (--unpack): > trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/perl6/vendor/precomp/ C847F303DB03DE97DCB92EFEE90C0

Bug#1019935: xorriso: Please make Multi-Arch: foreign

2022-09-17 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Saturday, 17 September 2022 09:35:35 CEST Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Seems plausible if xorriso gets it. > > Dominique: Do you agree ? Yes. > My cheat sheet says that i shall add new sections with "UNRELEASED" instead > of "unstable" and that you change this word when uploading. > So i wonder wh

Bug#1019579: raku-json-unmarshal: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/perl6/vendor/precomp/C847F303DB03DE97DCB92EFEE90C0526E0D4FDF0/C1/C1DA909DAD9BF713751A74EBF038C545A1EA6ECC', which is also in package rak

2022-09-14 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Monday, 12 September 2022 16:21:45 CEST Adrian Bunk wrote: > ... > Unpacking raku-json-unmarshal (0.10-1) ... > dpkg: error processing archive > /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-Kxnez1/92-raku-json-unmarshal_0.10-1_arm64.deb > (--unpack): trying to overwrite > '/usr/lib/perl6/vendor/precomp/C847F303DB03DE9

Bug#1016795: RM: perl6-readline -- ROM; obsolete, replaced by raku-readline

2022-08-07 Thread Dominique Dumont
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hello Following Perl6 rename to Raku, all raku modules are renamed with the pattern raku-. raku-readline is now in unstable, so it's time to remove perl6-readline. All the best

Bug#1016641: RM: software-copyright -- ROM; wrong source package name, replaced with new one

2022-08-04 Thread Dominique Dumont
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi I've messed up when I created software-copyright source package. It should have been libsoftware-copyright-perl. libsoftware-copyright-perl source package is now in Debian unstable. It's time to remove software-copyright source package. Sorry for the

Bug#1016305: nodejs: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [Makefile:504: test-ci-js] Error 1

2022-07-31 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Sunday, 31 July 2022 16:35:12 CEST Jérémy Lal wrote: > Indeed, sorry for my somewhat irritated tone - it just happens that it was > the second time libuv1 was updated during a nodejs transition, and the > upstream bug it creates on nodejs hasn't been fixed yet, so it shoots the > transition in t

Bug#1016305: nodejs: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [Makefile:504: test-ci-js] Error 1

2022-07-31 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Saturday, 30 July 2022 19:36:26 CEST you wrote: > libuv1 is a library, you're supposed to manage the transition: > https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions This page applies when the new version breaks the ABI or API. This was not the case. There was no symbol change. The SO versi

Bug#1016305: nodejs: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [Makefile:504: test-ci-js] Error 1

2022-07-30 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Saturday, 30 July 2022 17:25:29 CEST you wrote: > libuv1 maintainer: please avoid uploading new versions when nodejs is > in transition... I package libuv1 because it's a dependency of moarvm. I don't follow nodejs releases, so I was not aware of on-going transition and I did not expect probl

Bug#1015913: /usr/share/perl5/Config/Model/models/Dpkg/Control.pl: failure applying Dpkg::Control fixes when current directory is single character

2022-07-27 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Monday, 25 July 2022 10:19:18 CEST you wrote: > I guess I can tweak the formula > l30 to return undef when the match regex (L35) cannot be satisfied. Which uncovered a bug in libconfig-model-perl. Fixing this bug will also require libconfig-model-perl 2.151 All the best

Bug#1015913: /usr/share/perl5/Config/Model/models/Dpkg/Control.pl: failure applying Dpkg::Control fixes when current directory is single character

2022-07-25 Thread Dominique Dumont
Hi On Saturday, 23 July 2022 20:31:40 CEST you wrote: > Configuration item 'source Source' has a wrong value: > computed value error: > value '1' does not match regexp \w[\w+\-\.]{1,} > value is computed from 'use Cwd; getcwd =~ m!/([^/]+)$!; $1;' Right. This is one case where cme t

Bug#1015110: raku-getopt-long: FTBFS: Failed to create directory '/usr/lib/perl6/site/short' with mode '0o777': Failed to mkdir: Permission denied

2022-07-17 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Saturday, 16 July 2022 15:55:05 CEST Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Could not find Getopt::Long in: > > /<>/debian/tmp/home/.raku The real issue is the error above which comes from a bug in dh-raku. The failed attempt to create directory '/usr/lib/perl6/site/short' is a warning. I'll deal with it

Bug#1014095: azure-cli: az error: no module 'azure.mgmt.containerservice.v2022_04_01'

2022-06-30 Thread Dominique Dumont
Package: azure-cli Version: 2.37.0-2 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, az cli fails due to a missing dependency: $ az aks get-upgrades --resource-group alilo-dev --name alilo-dev The command failed with an unexpected error. Here is the traceback: No module named 'azure.mgmt.containerservice

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >