I did ten reboots with megaglest installed. The first
five were nominal, the 7th never got to VC login prompt
after all the boot/init messages stopped and the screen
cleared, and the rest failed as previously reported.
I then uninstalled the megaglest packages and started
reboot test again. Exce
After the reboot, XFCE came up nominally. Launching
megaglest also came up nominally, as did lincity-ng.
I will attempt to determine how intermittent the
problem is with a bunch of reboots for a while, then
uninstall all the megaglest software and do a bunch
more reboots.
--
May the LORD God ble
On 14Nov07:2142+0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
>
> What happens if you try to play other games such as megaglest,
> foobillardplus or cube2-data?
I installed megaglest which pulled in famfamfam-flag-png, fonts-uralic,
libftgl2, libircclient1, libminiupnpc10, libxerces-c3.1, and
megaglest-data witho
I noticed these two for linux-image-3.16:
#768452 system locks up every one or two days since upgrade to kernel 3.16
#768483 system freeze, usually on kernel upgrade or resume from hibernate
that appear to be similar--can this bug be transferred to their queue?
--
May the LORD God bless you exc
On 14Nov07:1912+0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> I don't believe this is related to lincity-ng because the game has not
> been updated for quite some time, but rather to a change in the kernel
> or your nouveau drivers. I can confirm that lincity-ng works with the
> free radeon drivers on my system.
Readable and sorted aptitude history:
Start-Date: 2014-11-07 11:36:44
Reinstall:
man-db:amd64(2.7.0.2-3)
Upgrade:
curl:amd64 (7.38.0-2, 7.38.0-3),
glibc-doc:amd64 (2.19-12, 2.19-13),
g
Package: lincity-ng
Version: 2.0-4+b1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
After applying normal morning Sid update, launching lincity-ng in
XFCE environment brings up black screen with centered X-pointer and
non-functional mouse buttons. After about half a minute, nouveau
complains in kern.log:
On 14Oct05:2254+0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Also, the re-evaluation happened. It however didn't had the outcome
> you wanted (basically because the web browser needs so many security
> updates which only could be done by backporting all of it that the
> embedded copy doesn't make any difference -
I built a virtual machine, installed D-I Beta 1 netinst
with no additional software, performed a full-upgrade to
Sid, and installed a minimum configuration virt-manager
and task-xfce-desktop with no auto-recommends, and the
GUI does not manifest the issues previously observed.
I would think this pr
Odd--reportbug asked for and received my current
email address, yet From: went out with the old and
non-existent address. Please use the email address
for this addition.
--
May the LORD God bless you exceedingly abundantly!
Dave_Craig__
"So the unive
Package: virt-manager
Version: 1:1.0.1-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
After my daily Sid update which upgraded virt-manager among
others, the windows are laid out differently, and radio buttons
and checkboxes immediately lose any contents. It is almost
impossible to create a new virtual
On 14Sep24:1424-0400, David L. Craig wrote:
>
> Maybe I should be a full-time tester--I seem to be pretty
> good at it. I built another vm from the D-I beta,
> pointed sources.list at sid, and ran aptitude update,
> all as before. This time, though, I held all updates
> whi
On 14Sep24:1951+0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 24.09.2014 um 18:45 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> > Craig was so kind and provided me with access to the VM images.
> >
> > With that image I was able to reproduce the upgrade failure.
> > I checked the systemd state before the upgrade and noticed that
>
On 14Sep23:1719-0400, David L. Craig wrote:
> Another datum: I decided to try switching back to
> systemd-sysv on my primary bare-metal Sid and the
> update was textbook:
>
> ii libpam-systemd:amd64 215-4
> ii libsystemd-id128-0:amd64 215-4
> ii libsystemd-jour
Another datum: I decided to try switching back to
systemd-sysv on my primary bare-metal Sid and the
update was textbook:
ii libpam-systemd:amd64 215-4
ii libsystemd-id128-0:amd64 215-4
ii libsystemd-journal0:amd64 215-4
ii libsystemd-login0:amd64 215-4
ii libsystemd-login0:i386215
On 14Sep23:0956-0400, David L. Craig wrote:
> By way of a feasibility test, I had virt-manager
> Shut Down ==> Save the a762146 vm at its ready for
> first login state and have put the tarball of the
> 124MB file it created in /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/save
> up at
> http://dlc.c
On 14Sep23:0023+0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Yeah, this would be perfect
By way of a feasibility test, I had virt-manager
Shut Down ==> Save the a762146 vm at its ready for
first login state and have put the tarball of the
124MB file it created in /var/lib/libvirt/qemu/save
up at
http://dlc.casit
On 14Sep23:0016+0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 22.09.2014 um 23:23 schrieb David L. Craig:
> > On 14Sep21:2011+0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >
> >> What were the exact error messages you got?
> >> Please provide the dpkg log and the output from journalctl -alb
&
On 14Sep21:2011+0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> What were the exact error messages you got?
> Please provide the dpkg log and the output from journalctl -alb
I ran the test case again and obtained the same results
from "aptitude dist-upgrade" and began receiving the kernel
messages about journald as
On 14Sep22:0005+0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 21.09.2014 um 23:28 schrieb David L. Craig:
>
> > No, but, as the report mentioned, the vm failure was
> > preceded by a similar result doing the daily update
> > of the main non-vm Sid instance on the box, which is
>
Correction:
udev and systemd reported replacing 208-6.
^^^ not aptitude
--
May the LORD God bless you exceedingly abundantly!
Dave_Craig__
"So the universe is not quite as you thought it was.
You'd better rearrange your beliefs, then.
B
Package: udev
Version: 215-4
Severity: grave
Installed Beta 1 D-I amd64 netinst without mirror or
standard utils in preparation for dist-upgrade to Sid
using aptitude with sources.list:
deb ftp://debian.csail.mit.edu/debian/ sid main
udev and aptitude reported replacing 208-6.
udev fails first
Having discovered this bug report and subsequently absorbing
it, I cloned the repository, built the debs, and installed
them into my primary Sid box. Now I need to track the repo.
I didn't see why this package has still not been uploaded.
Perhaps I need to reread the report.
Nonetheless, all the
The final two commands reported begin with './waf', not '../waf';
i.e., the actual commands executed agree with the cookbook, not
the bug report).
--
May the LORD God bless you exceedingly abundantly!
Dave_Craig__
"So the universe is not quite as you t
On 12Aug23:2032-0400, David L. Craig wrote:
> On 12Aug23:1850-0400, David L. Craig wrote:
>
> I'm looking at the nvidia forum's guidelines for reporting
> bugs and will let you know what I determine to do.
There being no obvious comparable existing report, I opened
On 12Aug15:1037+0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2012-08-15 09:48, David L. Craig wrote:
> > I updated all the nvidia packages when I saw the new versions
> > but the problem persists. I am including the most recent kern.log
>
> > Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-rt-amd64 (SM
Package: nvidia-glx
Version: 302.17-3
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
I had installed Sid into an available partition and X was happy with
nouveau. nvidia was functioning well under Linux Mint Xfce 13. After
installing the nvidia packages and porting the Mint xorg.conf
Maybe it's time to become a DD. I've been unable to scare up a job in
IT for a long time now so maybe it's time to plan to just live on Social
Security benefits (if you call that living) and invest my copious free
time into the community.
I started with Debian at version 1.0^H1 (Linux Counter
Apparently this addendum never was received or accepted.
-- Forwarded message --
From: David L. Craig < dlc@gmail.com >
Date: Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 6:47 PM
Subject: Knoppix Worked
To: 598...@bugs.debian.org
I built a USB-ZIP format Knoppix-Live stick with
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: USB-stick
Image version:
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/hd-media/boot.img.gz
Date: Image downloaded at 04:51 UTC 02 Oct 2010
Machine: Acer Aspire one
532h-2789
Processor: Atom N450
Memory: 1 GB
Partitions: N/A (floppy
image)
Ou
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 04:36:09PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:04:30AM -0500, David L. Craig wrote:
>
> > [*blush*] They mount fine when I change noamode to noatime,
> > even rw. Clearly my IBM mainframe background is showing.
>
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 09:07:40AM -0500, David L. Craig wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 09:26:25AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> > large_file is marked as read-only compatible and supported since at
> > least 2.6.12.
[*blush*] They mount fine when I change noamode t
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 09:26:25AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> tags 569524 moreinfo
> thanks
No, thank YOU! You probably don't want to think about how much
this would be costing me if you were working on this problem for
the benefit of Microsoft versus how much _you_ would be getting.
> Any r
Package: apt
Version: 0.7.6
Severity: important
File: /usr/bin/apt-get
Last five messages issued prior to termination:
634 upgraded, 95 newly installed, 3 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/703MB of archives.
After unpacking 261MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to c
34 matches
Mail list logo
