On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 6:27 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> So you don't think it should be changed upstream in Sugar? Puzzled.
This patch is being pushed upstream to sugar labs parallel with its
request for inclusion in Debian. That is part of the learning
process.
At this stage in the develop p
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 9:38 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> I agree with the change, but I do not think it is worth changing at
> Debian packaging level. It should be changed upstream in Sugar.
James,
I agree with you in theory and in a few months we probably won't
be implementing changes like
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 06:19:57PM -0600, David Farning wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 01:18:50PM -0600, David Farning wrote:
>>
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 01:18:50PM -0600, David Farning wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you mean some other package than my proposed honey-NN?
>>
>&
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 10:34:12PM -0600, David Farning wrote:
>>
>> The difference is that they expect to be able to install bundles via
>> install_activity_bundle. From a technical POV the issue seems similar
changes downstream for handling ALSO installs. If and when those
changes prove useful, we can talk about pushing them into Debian.
david
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 06:51:49PM -0600, David Farning wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 3,
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 01:24:45PM +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 12:58:34PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>
>>> My understanding was that Jonas believes that software should be
>>> deployed by the distro and not by
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 09:04:09PM -0600, David Farning wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 04:26:55PM -0600, dfarning wrote:
&g
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 04:26:55PM -0600, dfarning wrote:
Is serious the correct category for this type of bug?
Nope. More info here: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
Read it.
Also, please simply skip version numbe
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Sascha Silbe
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 09:08:33AM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>
> [error displayed if Ohm unreachable]
>>
>> Maybe the logging level should be downgraded to WARNING?
>
> That would make the most sense to me. It isn't an error (because Sugar
>
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 6:19 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> tag 563037 pending
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:34:06AM -0500, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero
> wrote:
>>
>> When running sugar-emulator-0.88 i got an import simplejson error,
>> this can be fixed having python-simplejson as depe
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks for reporting this!
>
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 07:18:28PM -0600, dfarning wrote:
>>
>> When starting sugar the following error is reported.
>>
>> 262075813.339706 ERROR dbus.proxies: Introspect error on
>> org.freedes
12 matches
Mail list logo
