Bug#1030129: (no subject)

2023-08-10 Thread Dan Mick
Are there any plans to backport this? Is the bug in a state that allows it to show up as an action item for the maintainers?

Bug#1030129: (no subject)

2023-08-01 Thread Dan Mick
Can this bug be backported to stable?

Bug#918535: Any action?

2019-04-24 Thread Dan Mick
Hi; is anything in progress about this update? Should I go figure out how to do an NMU?

Bug#918535: smartmontools: New upstream release (7.0)

2019-01-24 Thread Dan Mick
Is there anything I can do to help out or urge this along? On Mon, 07 Jan 2019 08:37:56 + James Page wrote: > Package: smartmontools > Version: 6.6-1 > Severity: wishlist > > Dear Maintainer, > > smartmontools upstream just did a 7.0 release that includes JSON > output support which is need

Bug#887666: (no subject)

2018-12-06 Thread Dan Mick
Can this bug be moved along? It keeps biting me

Bug#862075: (no subject)

2017-05-08 Thread Dan Mick
I filed upstream bug http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19884

Bug#842429: RFS: mlocate/0.26-1.1 [NMU]

2016-11-08 Thread Dan Mick
On 11/08/2016 09:11 AM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > control: owner -1 ! > control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 09:50:51PM -0700, Dan Mick wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mlocate" > > o/ Thanks, Mattia. > (though that templ

Bug#786433: NMU in RFS

2016-11-03 Thread Dan Mick
I've created an update to the package, and requested a sponsor: https://bugs.debian.org/842429

Bug#842429: RFS: mlocate/0.26-1.1 [NMU]

2016-10-28 Thread Dan Mick
d. * Add cephfs to PRUNEFS and /var/lib/ceph to PRUNEPATHS Closes: #786433 -- Dan Mick Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:41:42 -0700 Regards, Dan Mick

Bug#786433: NMU?

2016-10-06 Thread Dan Mick
Tollef, would NMU help you here? I have a keen interest in getting this fixed.

Bug#791913: ceph: please make the build reproducible

2015-07-09 Thread Dan Mick
I would add a comment explaining the sort or it will surely be forgotten. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#760538: [Ceph-maintainers] Bug#760538: Bug#760538: Bug#760538: ceph maintainer address redirects to a closed list

2014-11-14 Thread Dan Mick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 11/14/2014 03:16 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:49:24 Dan Mick wrote: >>>> It is serious because it is a violation of Policy ยง3.3. >> >> Further: please quote me the provision of 3.3 that this mai

Bug#760538: [Ceph-maintainers] Bug#760538: Bug#760538: ceph maintainer address redirects to a closed list

2014-11-14 Thread Dan Mick
On 11/14/2014 01:36 PM, Clint Adams wrote: > Control: severity 760538 serious > > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 03:31:39PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: >> Thanks but how do you justify severity level? "serious" may affect unstable- >> to-testing migration so I'm lowering severity to "important". > >

Bug#658552: Just ran across this in Ubuntu 12.04 as well

2012-05-16 Thread Dan Mick
Ubuntu bug filed, but it really should get into the .deb's all over -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org