Bug#757192: RFA: cvc3 - Automatic theorem prover for SMT problems

2014-08-05 Thread Christopher L Conway
Package: wnpp Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: mdet...@cs.nyu.edu

Bug#678183: cvc3: Please drop unused gcj-native-helper dependency

2012-06-19 Thread Christopher L Conway
Niels, Thanks for the suggestion, but I can't effectively act on it. I've had bug fixes waiting for sponsorship since March with no response. I can't make any changes to the package until a Debian Developer steps up who can actually upload it to unstable. -Chris On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:36 PM,

Bug#671973: cvc3: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b cvc3-2.4.1 gave error exit status 2

2012-05-08 Thread Christopher L Conway
Lucas, A new version of this package has been languishing unsponsored on mentors for two months: http://mentors.debian.net/package/cvc3. Can you check that the problem persists in that version? -Chris On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: cvc3 > Version: 2.4.1-2 > Seve

Bug#668398: RFS: cvc3/2.4.1-3

2012-04-11 Thread Christopher L Conway
* Adding Replaces/Conflicts to libcvc3-5-jni for libcvc3-2-jni (Closes: #662200) * Leaving .el files in site-lisp directory when installing cvc3-el (Closes: #665319) -- Christopher L. Conway Wed, 11 Apr 2012 10:02:19 -0400 Regards, Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs

Bug#662200: libcvc3-5-jni and libcvc3-2-jni: error when trying to install together

2012-03-05 Thread Christopher L Conway
I've uploaded a new package to mentors that addresses this and #662198. I decided to add a Replaces/Breaks on libcvc3-2-jni, since the file /usr/lib/jni/libcvc3jni.so appears to be necessary for the binary package to function. -Chris On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Christopher L C

Bug#662200: libcvc3-5-jni and libcvc3-2-jni: error when trying to install together

2012-03-05 Thread Christopher L Conway
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Ralf Treinen wrote: > Hello, > > On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 01:22:19PM -0500, Christopher L Conway wrote: > >Not sure how to handle this. On the C++ side, the policy dictates a > >libcvc3-X package with libcvc3.so.X and a libcv

Bug#662200: libcvc3-5-jni and libcvc3-2-jni: error when trying to install together

2012-03-04 Thread Christopher L Conway
Not sure how to handle this. On the C++ side, the policy dictates a libcvc3-X package with libcvc3.so.X and a libcvc3-X-dev package with libcvc3.so -> libfoo.so.X. On the Java side, we don't have any headers to install, so a libcvc3-X-jni-dev package seems like overkill just for a libcvc3jni.so sym

Bug#662198: libcvc3-5-dev and libcvc3-2-dev: error when trying to install together

2012-03-04 Thread Christopher L Conway
I'm preparing a new version of the source package, changing the dev package to libcvc3-dev with Conflicts/Replaces for libcvc3-5-dev and libcvc3-2-dev. I suppose we should also delete libcvc3-5-dev from the repository. (In that case should I remove the Conflicts/Replaces for that package?) -Chris

Bug#661570: RFS: cvc3/2.4.1-1

2012-02-27 Thread Christopher L Conway
Closes: #660244) * Updating to standards version 3.9.2 * Switching to dpkg-source 3.0 (quilt) format * Changing default-jdk-builddep build dependency to default-jdk * Re-enabling libcvc3-jni on kfreebsd-amd64 (Closes: #576335) -- Christopher L. Conway Sat, 25 Feb 2012 13:54:15 - Regards, Chris

Bug#660244: Please update CVC3 to an upstream version.

2012-02-26 Thread Christopher L Conway
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 6:23 AM, wrote: > How much? > I meant "sponsor" as in initiate an upload of the package to the unstable repository. It's free, if you happen to be a Debian Developer ( http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#Sponsored_Packages). :-) I haven't been in touch with my previo

Bug#660244: Please update CVC3 to an upstream version.

2012-02-25 Thread Christopher L Conway
I've prepared a new package for v2.4.1. Let me know if you are able to sponsor it. -Chris On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:31 AM, wrote: > Package: cvc3 > Version: 2.2-13.1 > Severity: wishlist > > It would be nice if you could update to the latest upstream version (27 > January 2012 or later). The c

Bug#535129: cedet-common depending on cogre

2010-06-01 Thread Christopher L Conway
I agree with Andreas. This bug makes the package unusable and should be prioritized. The problem is that cedet.el tries to load all of the packages cogre, ede, eieio, semantic, speedbar, cedet-contrib on startup and fails if it can't find any of them. But cedet.el is installed by cedet-common, whi

Bug#576335:

2010-04-08 Thread Christopher L Conway
I'm working around this bug in the next version of the CVC3 package by removing kfreebsd-amd64 from the supported architectures of libcvc3-jni. If anybody could provide advice on a proper fix, it would be greatly appreciated. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#575002:

2010-04-07 Thread Christopher L Conway
This appears to be caused by the following assignment in src/sat/minisat_solver.cpp, line 1582: d_assigns[var] = toInt(lbool(p.sign())); d_assigns has type vector. On the affected architectures, char is unsigned. When p.sign() is -1, the result is that d_assigns[var] is assigned 255, an unsig

Bug#576334:

2010-04-03 Thread Christopher L Conway
Michael Tautschnig reports: The problem, at least for most of the build failures, is a very simple one: An endianness issue, which actually lies in the original MiniSat code. The declaration of d_assigns in line 251 of src/sat/minisat_solver.h declares the assignments as a vector of chars; assign

Bug#575002: cvc3: FTBFS on various archs/in various ways

2010-04-03 Thread Christopher L Conway
I've requested removal of the failing binaries here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576333 The regression failures appear to fall into two classes. I've cloned a bug for the std::bad_alloc error here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576334 The JVM crash

Bug#576334: Cloning for std::bad_alloc on armel powerpc s390

2010-04-03 Thread Christopher L Conway
This version of the bug is for tracking the failures on armel, powerpc, and s390. (armel doesn't print the std::bad_alloc message, but it fails in the same place. Let's assume this is the same bug for now.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#576335: Cloning for JVM core dumps on kfreebsd-amd64

2010-04-03 Thread Christopher L Conway
This version of the bug is for the JVM core dump on kfreebsd-amd64. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#576333: RM: cvc3 [armel kfreebsd-amd64 powerpc s390] -- ROM, RC-buggy

2010-04-03 Thread Christopher L Conway
Package: ftp.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#575002: cvc3: FTBFS on various archs/in various ways

2010-03-22 Thread Christopher L Conway
Kibi, Thanks for reporting this. I've already file a bug upstream for these errors. As the problem architectures are not directly supported by upstream and I don't have access to testing machines for these architectures, I'm not sure what the correct resolution is. Should I remove these architectu

Bug#559245:

2009-12-09 Thread Christopher L Conway
This package has been uploaded to mentors.debian.org and needs a sponsor: http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=cvc3 It has also been uploaded to REVU: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=cvc3

Bug#482281: Workaround?

2008-05-21 Thread Christopher L Conway
Is there: (a) a standard way to peg my ocaml packages at 3.10.1 until the transition is complete, or (b) anything I can do to help get camlidl updated more quickly? Regards, Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#482281: camlidl: Package uninstallable: depends on outdated ocaml-nox (3.10.1)

2008-05-21 Thread Christopher L Conway
Package: camlidl Severity: normal *** Please type your report below this line *** -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-17-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CT

Bug#477010:

2008-05-07 Thread Christopher L Conway
Disregard the previous patch in preference to the attached. diff -ruN -x cvs -x CVS -x '*~' -x config.log /home/chris/downloads/pycaml/Makefile.in pycaml/Makefile.in --- /home/chris/downloads/pycaml/Makefile.in 2003-09-17 01:30:14.0 -0400 +++ pycaml/Makefile.in 2008-05-06 21:49:38.0

Bug#477010: taking the address of a macro

2008-05-07 Thread Christopher L Conway
The attached patch against the original source tree should solve the problem. Regards, Chris On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Christopher L Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem is that the relevant lines are trying to create function > pointers, but the identifiers name

Bug#477010: taking the address of a macro

2008-05-06 Thread Christopher L Conway
The problem is that the relevant lines are trying to create function pointers, but the identifiers named are really macros. The following example gives a similar error: macroptr.c: int f(int x, int y, int z) { return 0; } #define FOO(x) f(x,0,0) int (*p)() = &f; int (*q)() = &FOO; $ gcc macropt