Package: displaycal
Version: 3.9.14-1+b1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: char...@hagedorn.xyz
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Ran apt-update, saw that displaycal was in the list, got excited. Very exciting
to see displaycal coming back to life. Ran apt dist-upgrade. Ran dis
Just a request to bump this bug. While the original submitter's request (at
4.2, requesting an upgrade to 4.4 in July 2023) has been addressed with the
present version (4.4), darktable has moved on to 4.6, as of December 2023.
See: https://www.darktable.org/news/
At maintainers' convenience, plea
raded only
libavif15:i386 , and all was well.
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 9:56 PM Charlie Hagedorn
wrote:
> As a week has passed and regular updates haven't resolved the issue, so
> I've dug in deeper. Following a suggestion here (
> https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions
ather than change libavif16:amd64
Holding Back libgd3:i386 rather than change libgd3:amd64
Holding Back libavif15:i386 rather than change libavif15:amd64
Will report back if I find a way to resolve the issue.
On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 4:31 PM Charlie Hagedorn
wrote:
> I've encountered
I've encountered the same behavior twice. First time was a total surprise
and I had to 'apt install darktable', which fortunately worked.
Today, I noted that darktable would be removed with apt dist-upgrade
Requested output follows:
[charlie@dicke:~]$ sudo apt dist-upgrade
Reading package lists.
I've been a happy user of dispcalgui for years. I just rebooted my machine
(Debian testing, uptime > 140 days) and went to recalibrate, only to find
that displaycal had disappeared.
Looking at this thread upstream ( https://hub.displaycal.net/issue/17813/ )
it appears that the ETA for a port to Py
Chiming in to confirm that a debian-testing update just now pulled
in libgegl-0.4-0:amd64 (0.4.14-2). GIMP starts up as expected with the
first jpeg I tried. My system was never apt-pinned.
Back to image editing!
Thank you, everyone who makes Debian possible!
Charlie
Great -- given that this bug is at least a week old, several people have
found fixes, and a fix hasn't yet made it into the 'testing' updates, what
is necessary to get a fix pushed to the world?
I can apt-pin like many of the correspondents in this report, and many
other reports for the same probl
Package: darktable
Version: 2.6.0-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Upgraded via apt-get dist-upgrade this morning. Darktable worked great prior to
the upgrade, and has for ye
The problem appears to have resolved itself. The computer was restarted at
least once, and has been updated at least once. A check of the dependencies
with reportbug suggests that no change in taskwarrior's dependencies
occurred.
Please close this bug at this time -- I will reply back if it recurs
Pulled from /var/log/apt/history.log, chasing down taskwarrior's
dependencies, as found by reportbug. Taskwarrior was functioning normally
for me through at least August 23. I believe that it failed following the
August 27 update.
I haven't changed anything in my taskwarrior configuration in many
Package: taskwarrior
Version: 2.5.1+dfsg-6
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
A long-functioning taskwarrior installation fails to sync and crashes, perhaps
after a recent update.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffect
Package: flowblade
Version: 1.12-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Installed flowblade. sudo apt-get install flowblade
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effect
Package: duplicity
Version: 0.7.16-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Running my usual scripts to interact with Backblaze B2, specifically listing
the contents of the remote repos
Seconded -- it was a surprise to find that I could install planner on a
Jessie box, but not a testing box, this morning.
How can we help the maintainer get a functioning copy of planner into
testing?
er for my work, but after spending more than a day
narrowing down the problem, I'd like to save someone else the effort! :).
Charlie
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Charlie Hagedorn <
charlie.haged...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Package: octave-ltfat
> Version: 2.0.1-1
> Severity
Package: octave-ltfat
Version: 2.0.1-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I've had inconsistent Octave seg-faults on several jessie machines that I've
traced to at least the octave-ltfat package. The seg-faults are triggered calls
to the Octave function rcond. Installing octave-ltfat makes it
013-07-03 Charlie Hagedorn wrote:
> > Restarted X (it had been up through a few updates), and the problem with
> > hugin persists. Xorg.0.log attached.
> [...]
>
> Hello,
>
> this looks broken:
>
> [2600271.575] (II) LoadModule: "glx"
> [2600271.
Restarted X (it had been up through a few updates), and the problem with
hugin persists. Xorg.0.log attached.
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Andreas Metzler <
ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org> wrote:
> On 2013-06-18 Charlie Hagedorn wrote:
> > > > [:~]$ glxgears -info
>
> > [:~]$ glxgears -info
> > Xlib: extension "GLX" missing on display ":0.0".
> > Error: couldn't get an RGB, Double-buffered visual
> > [:~]$
>
> And at this point it simply exits?
>
Yes.
> Do you have libgl1-mesa-dri or libgl1-mesa-swx11 installed?
>
Looks like libgl1-mesa-dri is installed.
mesa-utils was not installed. After installing it (didn't pull in any other
packages), I get:
[:~]$ glxgears -info
Xlib: extension "GLX" missing on display ":0.0".
Error: couldn't get an RGB, Double-buffered visual
[:~]$
[:~]$ hugin
/usr/share/hugin/data/plugins/shooting_pattern.py
CAT:initia
By switching 'Interface' to expert, I'm able to recover much of the
relevant functionality.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:50 PM, charlie wrote:
> Package: hugin
> Version: 2013.0.0~beta1+dfsg-3
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
> *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropr
22 matches
Mail list logo
