>If you don't like the software, don't use it.
Absolutely. But that is not really an option that is to be afforded to all of
us if
the systemd guys successfully have their way with linux.
It would be nice if they afforded us such a freedom, but their statements
and their actions suggest that t
This sounds like a good solution, since MATE is the gnome we all knew, and the
Gnome of today is a different beast entirely (though it gets to keep the name).
::
>Hum, we can always add “remove GNOME (3) from Debian” to the
>list of GR or TC points to consider (this *has* been suggested
>earlier,
s,
>--
>.''`.Josselin Mouette
On Wed, 1/29/14, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Subject: Re: Bug#727708: Re: Re: Bug#727708: multiple init systems: We have to
see it for what it is: Lennart/Linux OS. Yes it is.
To: "ChaosEsq
>This bug discussion is already quite long and protracted, and it would be
>easier for those following it if strategic discussions of how to drive the
>future of Linux could be moved to other, more appropriate forums where
>they have a better chance of finding their audience.
It's either Lennarts
Ah, you're a systemd acolyte. You smugly proclaim that it is USELESS to resist!
::
>Forking every package that depends on systemd is pointless.
If you read what I wrote you would see that I said fork everything below/or
above
(whatever "software stack" direction you believe in) the linux kernel,
We have to see it for what it is. Lennart Pottering and his acolytes
who work within other projects are essentially forking Gnu/Linux and
are creating LennartOS.
What should be done is to follow their often spoken refrain: fork
every project that relies on systemd, xyzkit, LennartStuff:
create X.o
6 matches
Mail list logo
