Bug#293932: [Python-Dev] license issues with profiler.py and md5.h/md5c.c

2005-02-11 Thread Bob Ippolito
On Feb 11, 2005, at 6:11 PM, Donovan Baarda wrote: G'day again, From: "Gregory P. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I think it would be cleaner and simpler to modify the existing md5module.c to use the openssl md5 layer API (this is just a search/replace to change the function names). The bigger problem i

Bug#293932: [Python-Dev] license issues with profiler.py and md5.h/md5c.c

2005-02-10 Thread Bob Ippolito
On Feb 10, 2005, at 9:50 PM, Donovan Baarda wrote: On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 21:30 -0500, Bob Ippolito wrote: On Feb 10, 2005, at 9:15 PM, Donovan Baarda wrote: On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 11:52 -0800, Gregory P. Smith wrote: [...] One possible alternative would be to bring in something like PyOpenSSL <h

Bug#293932: [Python-Dev] license issues with profiler.py and md5.h/md5c.c

2005-02-10 Thread Bob Ippolito
On Feb 10, 2005, at 9:15 PM, Donovan Baarda wrote: On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 11:52 -0800, Gregory P. Smith wrote: The md5.h/md5c.c files allow "copy and use", but no modification of the files. There are some alternative implementations, i.e. in glibc, openssl, so a replacement should be sage. Any other