On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 11:47:55AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > With the fixed xulrunner packages I successfully compiled
> > epiphany-browser and with the few websites I tested it even seems to
> > work fine.
>
> Tha patch contains a bad bugzilla bug reference. Could you point to the
> real one,
reassign 397645 metacity
severity 397645 wishlist
retitle 397645 /usr/share/menu/metacity considered harmful
quit
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 12:33:14PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > We can either be strict about them, asking them to implement the XSM
> > protocol, or simply ask the maintainer to b
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 11:43:12PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Package: debian-archive-keyring
> Version: 2006.11.22
> Severity: serious
>
> debian-archive-keyring does not depent on an apt that comes with
> apt-key, so in the course of upgrading from sarge to etch one can
> end up with a syst
severity 368485 serious
quit
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 06:15:16PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Package: amarok
> Version: 1.4.0-1
> Severity: important
>
> Hello Adeodato,
>
> Amarok involves two circular dependencies:
Here are the current dependencies:
amarok :Depends: amarok-engines | amarok
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 10:56:27PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> At least 4 major packages are presently affected by conffile prompts
> during upgrades from Sarge to current testing, because the name of the
> package owning some conffile changed. When dpkg queries "what is the
> md5sum of the old
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 02:09:02PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > http://www.dpkg.org/ConffileHandling
>
> The problem is that the conffiles have moved to different packages (ssh
> to openssh-{config,server}). The wiki page above doesn't explicitly
> cover this case, although I may be able to wo
6 matches
Mail list logo
