Bug#386469: Debian: failed openbsd-inetd upgrade: plea for more info

2007-03-11 Thread Ben Low
09:38:06 status half-configured openbsd-inetd 0.20050402-4 2007-02-21 09:43:06 status half-configured openbsd-inetd 0.20050402-4 2007-02-21 09:43:10 status half-configured openbsd-inetd 0.20050402-4 2007-02-21 09:44:26 status half-configured openbsd-inetd 0.20050402-4 2007-02-21 09:44:27 status installed o

Bug#386469: openbsd-inetd: action "start" failed (had to manually stop before upgrade succeeds)

2007-02-20 Thread Ben Low
Package: openbsd-inetd Version: 0.20050402-4 Followup-For: Bug #386469 I just experience apparently the same problem as descibed by Kent West (Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:20:51 -0600). Manually stopping openbsd-inetd before upgrading worked for me: $ sudo apt-get upgrade ... Setting up openbsd-inetd (0.

Bug#387538: workaround: remove logwtmp from /etc/pptpd.conf

2006-10-04 Thread Ben Low
Package: pptpd Version: 1.3.0-1 Followup-For: Bug #387538 This same bug seems has resurrected from 1.2.1-5 (#343150). Workaround is same as before: remove or comment out the logwtmp line in /etc/pptpd.conf. Rgds, Ben -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing

Bug#367046: privoxy segfault w/ UML = UML bug

2006-07-31 Thread Ben Low
Package: privoxy Version: 3.0.3-2-1 Followup-For: Bug #367046 Turns out this is a known User Mode Linux (uml) problem with the POSIX thread library TLS: http://www.mythic-beasts.com/umlwiki/wiki.pl?2.6_And_TLS which was apparently fixed recently (2.6.17): http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/3/28/330 i.e.

Bug#367046: privoxy: SIGSEGV

2006-05-26 Thread Ben Low
Package: privoxy Version: 3.0.3-2-1 Followup-For: Bug #367046 Hello, I too am running privoxy within a UML guest, and see much the same behaviour: # /usr/sbin/privoxy --no-daemon /etc/privoxy/config May 26 23:16:21 Privoxy(401aee60) Info: loading configuration file '/etc/privoxy/config': May 26

Bug#303492: gpgsm: Dependancy on gnupg2? (gpg-protect-tool)

2005-04-06 Thread Ben Low
Package: gpgsm Version: 1.9.15-5 Severity: normal Unaware of the relationship between gnupg2 and gpgsm, I installed gpgsm without having gnupg2 installed. gpgsm then couldn't find gpg-protect-tool, which is evidently part of gnupg2. Should gnupg2 be a dependancy for gpgsm? -- System Informatio

Bug#289493: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#289493: apache-common: Where is mod_proxy?)

2005-01-10 Thread Ben Low
: ... It was never removed. Please for the next time do not submit bugs for questions. Use instead the mailing list. Thanks Fabio -- Ben Low "Vote early and vote often." - Al Capone (1899-1947) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro