I understand that associating gimp with pdf is correct. So this isn't a bug in
gimp, or at most "wishlist". However, opening gimp by default instead of a pdf
viewer, has a "grave" impact on usability for desktop users. It is even so
"grave" that I can imagine that users switch to another Linux dist
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 06:31:59AM -0400, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-terminal/-/issues/7472
>
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 5:35 AM Bart Martens wrote:
>
> > > What do you think about
> > > https://salsa.
On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 09:46:31PM -0400, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 7:21 PM Bart Martens wrote:
> > When the value of /system/locale/region in .config/dconf/user is no
> > longer in /etc/locale.gen, then gnome-terminal silently fails to open.
> > The expe
Package: gnome-terminal
Version: 3.46.8-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: ba...@debian.org
When the value of /system/locale/region in .config/dconf/user is no
longer in /etc/locale.gen, then gnome-terminal silently fails to open.
The expected behavior is that gnome-terminal still opens. It could us
On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 10:59:21AM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Bart Martens , 2025-04-05 16:28:
> > Both links on the bug report produce 404.
>
> https://github.com/MatMasIt says "I am now hosting my repositories on a
> Gitea instance at gitea.mattiaturin.duckdns.org&qu
Hello Guido, how is progress on this?
On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 22:56:26 +0200 Guido =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FCnther?=
wrote:
> retitle 858160 ITP: wikiextractor -- tool to extract plain text from
a Wikipedia dump
> thanks
>
>
>
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 07:26:24PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Control: owner -1 s...@debian.org
>
> "Debian Bug Tracking System" writes:
>
> > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> >
> >> close 1072906
> > Bug #1072906 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: markdown-mode/2.6-2 [Team] -
Hi Zixing,
The newest stable upstream release is advertised in more than one way allowing
to write regular debian/watch files. Here below I give two working examples.
| version=4
|
https://forge.rust-lang.org/infra/other-installation-methods.html#source-code \
| https://static.rust-lang.org/d
Hello Zixing Liu,
Can I view an example of a package in Debian that can be watched with such
extension of fakeupstream? The link https://static.rust-lang.org/dist displays
an error in xml format. A real example would help me understand the context.
Ciao,
Bart
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 03:32:39PM
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 10:30:53AM +0200, debbug@sideload.33mail.com wrote:
> Debian bugs are mishandled too often, which suggests there is no
> oversight of mishandled cases. I have an example at hand:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1026922
>
> A valid, credible bug
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 12:15:56AM +, Paul Wise wrote:
> There are some improvements that we could make to QA services:
>
> * pass on HTTP error codes from services fakeupstream.cgi accesses
> * switch fakeupstream.cgi SourceForge support to using the RSS feed
> * switch fakeupstream.cgi/sf
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bart Martens
* Package name: gnucobol
Version : 3.1.2
Upstream Author : Roger While, Keisuke Nishida
* URL : https://www.gnu.org/software/gnucobol/
* License : GPL, LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : COBOL
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: notfound -1 3.24.24-3
Hi ZenWalker,
I have today successfully built this package in bullseye, on my amd64
(pbuilder) and on tests.reproducible-builds.org.
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/bullseye/am
Package: linux-base
Version: 4.6
Severity: minor
File: /usr/bin/perf
Observed behavior:
$ perf
/usr/bin/perf: line 13: exec: perf_5.10: not found
Expected behavior:
$ perf
/usr/bin/perf: line 14: exec: perf_5.10: not found
E: linux-perf-5.10 is not installed.
Dennis, Cyril,
Downloading the patches from the bts works fine. The patches can be applied
with ignoring whitespaces (option -l). The patches solve the FTBFS.
| (sid)bartm@carolus:~/src/sponsoring/netcfg-1.169$ patch -l -p1 <
../netcfg_1.169-fix-CheckAPI.patch
| patching file test/test_nc
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 12:02:52PM +0100, Vincent Blut wrote:
> Hi Bart,
>
> Le 2021-02-20 09:32, Bart Martens a écrit :
> > Package: installation-reports
> >
> > Boot method: usb stick
> > Image version: firmware-bullseye-DI-alpha3-amd64-netinst.iso
> > D
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: usb stick
Image version: firmware-bullseye-DI-alpha3-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: 20 feb 2021
Machine: Acer A515-56G-71RB NX.A1MEH.002
Processor: intel i7-1165G7 quad-core
Memory: 16 GB DDR4 SDRAM
Partitions:
df -Tl
Filesystem Type 1K-blocksU
ivately or publicly, and never says thing
> that you will regret later, or say it publicly. Especially we are
> discussing public matters, that affects the public and all authors.
>
> Such decision should not be conducted behind close doors.
>
> > On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 7:45
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 08:09:17PM -0300, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote:
> Hi Bart,
>
> > Are you aware that the file debian/not-installed was added? I doubt that
> > this
> > was intentional.
>
> I do not know if you can help me, but when I go to debuild[1] my package,
> this warning
> occurs.
>
Hi Carlos,
About this package at mentors:
Version:0.3.5-4
Uploaded: 2019-03-03 08:05
Source package:
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jag/jag_0.3.5-4.dsc
Are you aware that the file debian/not-installed was added? I doubt that this
was intentional.
| (sid)
Package: ftp.debian.org
Package: ftp.debian.org
Package: ftp.debian.org
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I suggest removing gmorgan. I added it in Debian, orphaned it years ago, and
nobody picks it up. I doubt anyone cares keeping this in Debian.
Cheers,
Bart
Hi, building the .deb with mvn is not sufficient for a package to enter Debian
I'm afraid. The best I can advise at this point is to do some more reading and
try to make a source package that is accessible for mentors/sponsors here with
a .dsc file. Let's start with that and see where to go from th
About this package at mentors:
Version:1.3.26-3
Uploaded: 2019-02-16 01:38
Source package:
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/note/note_1.3.26-3.dsc
In debian/patches/fix-spelling.patch some spelling fixes got removed, I guess
accidentally. For example "aditional
It's there now. With version 1.5.0. Shouldn't that be 1.5.0-1?
https://mentors.debian.net/package/popout3d
It's not at mentors at this time. Can you upload it there?
Hi Emmanuel,
Good to see you want to adopt this package. However, the version ending
with -1.2 seems meant for a non-maintainer upload. Any specific reason
for using an non-maintainer upload version number here?
Cheers,
Bart
Hi Robert,
This package has been removed from Debian some time ago. Are you sure that
bringing it back has good value?
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=870935
Also, there should be an ITP (not to be confused with an RFS with [ITA]).
Cheers,
Bart
Looking at the commits, it just follows debian.
Hello,
For packages not yet in debian, there must be an ITP as meant here:
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#newpackage
Cheers,
Bart
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 04:59:29PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Sat, 2016-08-06 at 05:20 +0000, Bart Martens wrote:
> > Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:02:40PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
Seems to work just fine here on wheezy:
| # cat /etc/debian_version
| 7.11
| # update-flashplugin-nonfree --status
| Flash Player version installed on this system : 11.2.202.632
| Flash Player version available on upstream site: 11.2.202.632
| flash-mozilla.so - auto mode
|
.1 in "Stable" or 1:3.7
> "Testing" and "Unstable".
Which CVEs exactly?
> For the record, backporting by hand-editing in the differences between
> 3.2 and 3.7 into the 3.2 version does seem to do the job
Which differences exactly matter?
Regards,
Bart Martens
reopen 834245
stop
Sorry my mistake, reopening.
+0200
+++ dh-elpa-1.1/.gitattributes 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ dh-elpa-1.1/.gitignore 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
Regards,
Bart Martens
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I hereby orphan this package, since I lack the time and interest
to maintain it properly.
Hi Lumin,
Where is the ITP? There should be one, see the instructions at "new packages":
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#newpackage
Regards,
Bart Martens
Hi Lumin,
Where is the ITP? There should be one, see the instructions at "new packages":
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#newpackage
Regards,
Bart Martens
Hi Rohan,
Where is the ITP? There should be one, see the instructions at "new packages":
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#newpackage
Regards,
Bart Martens
Hi Thomas,
Where is the ITP? There should be one, see the instructions at "new packages":
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#newpackage
Regards,
Bart Martens
Hi Herbert,
Where is the ITP? There should be one, see the instructions at "new packages":
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#newpackage
Regards,
Bart Martens
Hi Lumin,
Where is the ITP? There should be one, see the instructions at "new packages":
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#newpackage
Regards,
Bart Martens
Hi Emily,
Where is the ITP? There should be one, see the instructions at "new packages":
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#newpackage
Regards,
Bart Martens
sting package in Debian so the current
maintainer can consider a switch to your implementation.
Regards,
Bart Martens
ensures
that the latest get-upstream-version.pl will be used.
Regards,
Bart Martens
or install the package from unstable.
Regards,
Bart Martens
;
> I'm not sure if this counts as a bug, so I've marked it wishlist,
Perfect.
> but if it was possible to switch to downloading from the Adobe site,
> it would speed up the download, and make the 32-bit version available again.
Yes, I'm considering that.
Regards,
Bart Martens
;s
> also not stable across timezones.
Using %Y now, see attached debdiff. Permission to upload?
Regards,
Bart Martens
diff -Nru flashplugin-nonfree-3.6.1/debian/changelog
flashplugin-nonfree-3.6.1+deb8u1/debian/changelog
--- flashplugin-nonfree-3.6.1/debian/changelog 2014-12-21 10:03:31.0
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 03:19:59PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 11:38:34 +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
>
> > + if [ "`stat --format=%y $cachedir/get-upstream-version.pl`&quo
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I hereby orphan this package because I lack the time and interest to maintain
it properly.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I hereby orphan this package. I lack the time and interest to further maintain
it.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I hereby orphan this package.
te old get-upstream-version.pl from cache.
+Closes: #833413.
+
+ -- Bart Martens Thu, 04 Aug 2016 10:59:38 +0200
+
flashplugin-nonfree (1:3.6.1) unstable; urgency=medium
* debian/control: Pre-Depends: ca-certificates. Closes: #773633.
diff -Nru flashplugin-nonfree-3.6.1/update-flashplug
the beginning somewhat intentional, to avoid support calls from end
users blindly using --unverified as long as the pepperflashplugin-nonfree
package was fairly new. Now I see no objection against documententing it.
Regards,
Bart Martens
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I hereby orphan this package due to lack of time to maintain it properly.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I hereby orphan this package. I don't intend to maintain it anymore since I
lost interest. Anyone interested... go ahead.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I hereby orphan this package. I don't intend to maintain it anymore since I
lost interest. Anyone interested... go ahead.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I hereby orphan this package. I don't intend to maintain it anymore since I
lost interest. Anyone interested... go ahead.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I hereby orphan this package. I don't intend to maintain it anymore since I
lost interest. Anyone interested... go ahead.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I hereby orphan this package. I don't intend to maintain it anymore since I
lost interest. Anyone interested... go ahead.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I hereby orphan this package. I don't intend to maintain it anymore since I
lost interest. Anyone interested... go ahead.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I hereby orphan this package. I don't intend to maintain it anymore since I
lost interest. Anyone interested... go ahead.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I hereby orphan this package. I don't intend to maintain it anymore since I
lost interest. Anyone interested... go ahead.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I hereby orphan this package. I don't intend to maintain it anymore since I
lost interest. Anyone interested... go ahead.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I hereby orphan this package. I don't intend to maintain it anymore since I
lost interest. Anyone interested... go ahead.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I hereby orphan this package. I don't intend to maintain it anymore since I
lost interest. Anyone interested... go ahead.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I hereby orphan this package. I don't intend to maintain it anymore since I
lost interest. Anyone interested... go ahead.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I hereby orphan this package. I don't intend to maintain it anymore since I
lost interest. Anyone interested... go ahead.
;
> update-pepperflashplugin-nonfree --install --verbose >>
> /var/log/apt/updatepepper.log 2>&1
Yes, that's what you wrote earlier.
Regards,
Bart Martens
severity: wishlist
package: freedroidrpg
- Forwarded message from fluzz -
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 23:20:13 +0200
From: fluzz
To: ba...@debian.org
Subject: FreedroidRPG 0.16rc1
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/38.1.0
Hi Bart.
We released F
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:04:39PM +, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for libio-stty-perl (versioned as 0.03-1.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should
> delay it longer.
Go ahead, thanks.
Regards,
B
severity 791427 wishlist
retitle 791427 flashplugin-nonfree: support request
stop
No such problem here. I suspect a local networking issue, not a bug in the
package.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..
reopen 790945
stop
Ghislain,
I see that 1.2.3-1 is in unstable. Are you looking for sponsorship for updating
this package to 1.2.3-2? If yes, where is the package to sponsor? It's not on
mentors at this time...
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 08:15:49PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 30/06/15 at 17:47 +0000, Bart Martens wrote:
> > > How different is mole's data schema from UDD's?
> >
> > I guess you already have access to UDD's data schema. Can you access
> >
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 08:30:48AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 29/06/15 at 16:47 +0000, Bart Martens wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 09:47:50PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 28/06/15 at 09:08 +, Bart Martens wrote:
> &
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 09:47:50PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 28/06/15 at 09:08 +0000, Bart Martens wrote:
> > It already exists. We have cgi-bin/udd-dehs which reads from mole.watch. So
> > I
> > don't know why scripts/update-upstream-status would
It already exists. We have cgi-bin/udd-dehs which reads from mole.watch. So I
don't know why scripts/update-upstream-status would even run uscan.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
For completeness, some context information: We are using uscan on
qa.debian.org, and the focus is there reporting newer upstream versions, not
downloading the new upstream files. The option pgpsigurlmangle is related to
downloading the new upstream files. On qa.debian.org we don't unpack the entire
Package: devscripts
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/bin/uscan
When the watch file contains the pgpsigurlmangle option, then uscan will use
debian/upstream/signing-key.pgp or debian/upstream/signing-key.asc or
debian/upstream-signing-key.pgp if present, and fail if none of these files is
present. It
For the record, if we want uscan results in udd, then I suggest getting them
from mole.watch where they are being kept up to date, and including sepwatch.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debi
reopen 788217
owner 783084 Ghislain Vaillant
stop
I had overlooked "With his authorization". Reopening and setting Ghislain as
the owner of the ITP.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.o
-21
11:38:47.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+pepperflashplugin-nonfree (1.8.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * debian/control: Pre-Depends: ca-certificates. Closes: #773629.
+
+ -- Bart Martens Sun, 21 Dec 2014 11:37:47 +0100
+
pepperflashplugin-nonfree (1.8) unstable; urgency=medium
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+flashplugin-nonfree (1:3.6.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * debian/control: Pre-Depends: ca-certificates. Closes: #773633.
+
+ -- Bart Martens Sun, 21 Dec 2014 10:02:23 +0100
+
flashplugin-nonfree (1:3.6) unstable; urgency=medium
* debian/control: Depends: ca-certificates
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 1:3.6
Severity: serious
As illustrated below, flashplugin-nonfree should have "Pre-Depends:
ca-certificates".
| # apt-get install flashplugin-nonfree
| Reading package lists... Done
| Building dependency tree
| Reading state information...
The same problem is on https://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mini-buildd.html .
The output of https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/udd-dehs contains this:
| debian-mangled-uversion: 0.8.20
| debian-uversion: 0.8.20
| messages: Not downloading as --package was used. Use --download to force
download
Hi Thomas,
If you intend to package "fasm", then please retitle RFP 513402 to ITP and set
yourself as the owner. That makes clear that you are working on this, so nobody
else does duplicate effort.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.
Package: open-cobol
Severity: wishlist
http://sourceforge.net/projects/open-cobol/
"GnuCOBOL (formerly OpenCOBOL)"
"OpenCOBOL 1.1 continued on as GNU Cobol 1.1"
"Officially posted to ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gnucobol";
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
owner 560004 Andrej N. Gritsenko
stop
It seems Andrej is joining the team, see RFS 765601.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Ranga,
Do you intend to adopt xsettingsd? If yes, then please retitle 763987 from RFA
to ITA and set yourself as the owner.
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
1 - 100 of 1236 matches
Mail list logo
