As of the kernel 6.1.0-32-amd64 on bookworm, such freezes continue to occur.
The last one happened when I browsed the Web in Firefox 128.9.0esr-1~deb12u1;
the cursor froze when it was on a tab ruler.
Here's the log of the last seconds prior to the freeze:
Apr 11 20:30:09 AnonymPC dhclient[882
Thank you!
Hello,
I found some typos in the translation. I made a new file with (sometimes)
different wording.
Please check.
ar.po
Description: Binary data
Package: cups
Version: 2.4.2-3+deb12u8
When trying to print a PDF file from evince (or a text from libreoffice),
sometimes printing fails: the printer shows no activity. Here's what happens
when we try to print a single page from evince:
dmesg shows
…
[21592.361451] audit: type=1400 audit(174
I meant:
Till, if you're sure, feel free to reassign the bug report from CUPS top HPLIP…
Definitely not my day today.
I meant:
Till, if you're sure, feel free to reassign the bug report from CUPS to HPLIP…
Till, if you're sure, feel free to reassign the bug report to CUPS…
Package: libsane-hpaio:amd64
Version: 3.22.10+dfsg0-2
I get a bunch of red error messages when checking the status of cups:
$ LANG=en_US.utf8 sudo systemctl status cups
● cups.service - CUPS Scheduler
Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/cups.service; enabled; preset: enabled)
Active: a
#x27;t really know who adds the ${misc:Static-Built-Using}, but in case of FPC,
we use ${fpc:Static-Built-Using}.
If it happens this is also usable for FPC, we can change to that one.
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
re probably missing a package (which means a missing dependency on our
side)
I'll try to find that dependency, but if you can send me the list of installed
lazarus and lcl packages it could help me.
something like aptitude search 'lazarus|^lcl-'
>
> # stat /usr/share/man/man1/lazbuild.1.gz
> /usr/share/man/man1/lazre.1.gzs /usr/share/man/man1/lrstolfm.1.gz
> /usr/share/man/man1/svn2revisioninc.1.gz
> /usr/share/man/man1/updatepofiles.1.gz
> stat: cannot statx '/usr/share/man/man1/lazbuild.1.gz': No such file or
> directory
> stat: cannot statx '/usr/share/man/man1/lazre.1.gzs': No such file or
> directory
> stat: cannot statx '/usr/share/man/man1/lrstolfm.1.gz': No such file or
> directory
> stat: cannot statx '/usr/share/man/man1/svn2revisioninc.1.gz': No such
> file or directory
> stat: cannot statx '/usr/share/man/man1/updatepofiles.1.gz': No such
> file or directory
I consider this the only remaining issue in this bug report.
Is that OK for you?
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
86
>
> lazarus-ide recommends no packages.
>
> lazarus-ide suggests no packages.
> ...
Will it be possible to uninstall (maybe purge) all lazarus/lcl packages and
install again?
I just installed a fresh version of 3.8 over a 3.6 and it went as expected.
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Paul,
On Fri, 2025-02-07 at 15:57 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Thu, 2025-02-06 at 21:13 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > On Thu, 2025-02-06 at 21:04 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > > I *think* what I'm
&g
der with few days.
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Paul,
On Thu, 2025-02-06 at 21:13 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Thu, 2025-02-06 at 21:04 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > I *think* what I'm
> > seeing is a crash recorded during the generation of the man pages.
>
> Yes, indeed, I can see the
hange. I'll have a look at
it.
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
s the same warning, but an other component
> was not found.
Can you please have a try with FPC 3.2.2+dfsg-44 and Lazarus 3.8+dfsg1-6?
This should be now.
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ecompiling Laz_AVL_Tree, checksum changed for /usr/lib/x86_64-
> > linux-
> > gnu/fpc/3.2.2/units/x86_64-linux/rtl/classes.ppu
>
> "Checksum changed"
>
> Lazarus needs to be rebuilt with 3.2.2+dfsg-43
> (It was built with 3.2.2+dfsg-40)
I'm planning a build i
o use fpc @hardening -B -vn -So prepmx to
compile the program and it should generate dynamically linked program.
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I apologize for the line wrapping due to submitting the bug report via e-mail.
In the ideal world, this should not have happened.
Package: sane-utils
Version: 1.2.1-2
$ scanimage --help
…
-b, --batch[=FORMAT] working in batch mode, FORMAT is `out%d.pnm'
`out%d.tif'
`out%d.png' or `out%d.jpg' by default
depending on --format
This option is incompatible with
--out
Package: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau
Version: 1:1.0.17-2
The following occurs on a fully updated Debian 12.9 bookworm. While
working with firefox on GNOME on XOrg (and some other applications in
the background, such as libreoffice-writer, gedit, uxterm with bash and
a cmp-based script comparin
uot; || dpkg --compare-versions "$2" lt "3.8"
then
#DPKG_DIVERT_FILES#
fi
# Debhelper code
In the code above, #DPKG_DIVERT_FILES# should have been replaced by a list of
commands within the build process.
Some recent changes did probably break this.
I'll have a look at this.
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
$ sudo lspci -vv | grep -A81 GeForce
65:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation TU116 [GeForce GTX
1660] (rev a1) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
Subsystem: NVIDIA Corporation TU116 [GeForce GTX 1660]
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr-
Step
Package: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau
Version: 1:1.0.17-2
The following occurs on a fully updated Debian 12.9 bookworm. While
working with firefox on GNOME on XOrg (and some other applications in
the background, such as libreoffice-writer, gedit, uxterm with bash and
a cmp-based script comparin
inary-arch] Error 25
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary-arch subprocess returned exit
status 2
----
Build finished at 2025-01-20T07:50:04Z
-- System Information:
On buildd systems
This fail happens on all architectures.
Please let me know if you need more information
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
deed, but I see it very heavy to have laz-depends and cge-depends.
I think we need fpc-depends to be renamed dh_fpc and be a bit more intelligent,
don't you?
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
tle-game-engine
# Perform cleanup
find ${INSTALL_DIR} -empty -delete
+ fpc-depends
override_dh_auto_build-indep: prepare-source install-source
@echo "--- Building Documentation"
This way, the dependency on FPC is added dynamically upon the build.
are checksum
> errors, giveback or upload a new version of castle-game-engine.
One point, if there is a security fix, then we need to build winff, and all FPC
compiled tools.
Of course there will be no FTBFS in this case, but it is an important feature of
the tag 'Static-Built-Using'
and castle game engine.
The castle model viewer is a tool, not a library.
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Control: reopen -1
Hi Graham,
On Wed, 2025-01-08 at 10:27 -0100, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Hi Abou
>
> On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 at 19:48, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> > The issue here is that the test machine is running FPC 3.2.2+dfsg-34 while
> > the new CGE 7.0~alpha.3+dfsg1-4 requi
Exception "Exception":
> 112s Failed to compile
The issue here is that the test machine is running FPC 3.2.2+dfsg-34 while the
new CGE 7.0~alpha.3+dfsg1-4 requires FPC 3.2.2+dfsg-35 (which is a but by
itself).
I'll upload a new version enforcing this dependency and closing this bug.
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Control: reassign -1 castle-model-viewer
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
agreement about using 'Static-Built-Using' field by packages
compiling with FPC, I reassign this ticket to winff so that maintainer can add
the field and close this ticket.
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ges maintainers to add it to their packages.
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: scribus
Version: 1.5.8+dfsg-4+b4
How to reproduce:
$ scribus
pathForIcon: Unable to load icon /usr/share/scribus/icons/1_5_1/lab.png: File
not found
pathForIcon: Unable to load icon /usr/share/scribus/icons/1_5_1/spot.png: File
not found
pathForIcon: Unable to load icon /usr/share/scribu
found 1036232 libmutter-11-0/43.8-0+deb12u1
quit
Now the same failure message is printed in a different context:
Nov 08 21:11:50 NewDtPC gnome-shell[1185]: Extension pomod...@arun.codito.in
already installed in /usr/share/gnome-shell/extensions/pomod...@arun.codito.in.
/usr/share/gnome-shell/exte
Package: rhythmbox-plugins
Version: 3.4.6-2+b1 Control: affects -1 + python3-gi rhythmbox
Start rhythmbox on an mp3 file that you've not started it yet (since last
reboot or at all; I cannot tell exactly):
$ rhythmbox ~/Musik/Menezes_-_My_First_Kiss.mp3 & [1] 519774 $ Traceback (most
recent call
Hi Simon,
Thank you for looking at this.
On Tue, 2024-10-22 at 20:58 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Control: severity -1 important
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
>
> On Sat, 10 Jun 2023 at 23:40:38 +0200, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> > After installing Bookworm on
This issue is temporary and will be solved once we upload new version of CMV,
but for this we need to solve tests issue of CGE
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hm; which xorg driver to use for ASPEED AST2500 64MB on
https://www.asus.com/motherboards-components/motherboards/workstation/ws-c422-pro-se/techspec
https://www.asus.com/motherboards-components/motherboards/workstation/ws-c422-pro-se/techspec?
This board is still sold (even new from Amazon).
Hm; which driver to use for ASPEED AST2500 64MB on
https://www.asus.com/motherboards-components/motherboards/workstation/ws-c422-pro-se/techspec
https://www.asus.com/motherboards-components/motherboards/workstation/ws-c422-pro-se/techspec?
18.08.2024, 14:49, Fabio Pedretti < mailto:pedretti.fa..
I have the same request: please kindly consider upgrading.
For my purposes, I ask specifically for version 4.12.1 (which is NOT the most
recent version of Z3) because that's the one currently requested by dafny in
https://github.com/dafny-lang/dafny/wiki/INSTALL#linux-source .
Package: dafny
Version: 2.3.0+dfsg-0.1
Severity: wishlist
Please upgrade dafny from 2.3.0 (which was produced over 5 years ago) to a
reasonably new version (e.g., 4.7.0).
Hi Helmut,
On Sun, 2024-08-04 at 21:45 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> My offer to continue working on this and sending patches is still
> active despite the delay.
I'll be happy to integrate your patches.
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally sig
Package: grep
Version: 3.8-5
In Debian 12 stable, open an xterm in gnome on xorg and run:
$ grep "[[:ascii:]]" /etc/services
grep: Ungültiger Name für eine Zeichenklasse
$ LC_ALL=en_US.utf8 grep "[[:ascii:]]" /etc/services
grep: Invalid character class name
The same error comes up with [:nonascii:]
Hi Peter,
Thank you for your path, I'm going to integrate it and issue a new build.
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
severity 1061686 serious
thanks
I use Debian 12 with kernel 6.1.0-21-amd64. I installed kmscon 9.0.0-4 and
tried it out. Well, unicode on some console worked after reboot, but otherwise
there were too many bugs to even bother filing them. So I uninstalled kmscon
and rebooted. After that, I no lo
Package: inadyn
Version: 2.10.0-1
$ sudo aptitude install inadyn
[sudo] Passwort für username:
Die folgenden NEUEN Pakete werden zusätzlich installiert:
inadyn libconfuse-common{a} libconfuse2{a}
0 Pakete aktualisiert, 3 zusätzlich installiert, 0 werden entfernt und 4 nicht
aktualisiert.
126 kB an
Package: diffutils
Version: 1:3.8-4
Create two directories: empty A and B containing 'e9'$'\033''[H' . Then, from
an xterm:
$ ls A B
A:
B:
'e9'$'\033''[H'
$ diff -r A B
Nur in B: e9
After this prefix of the file name, the cursor jumps to the second line of the
used console from above and the out
Package: djview-plugin
Version: 4.11-1
On the current debian 12 stable „bookworm“ with firefox-esr
115.9.1esr-1~deb12u1, we get
$ sudo aptitude install djview-plugin
The following NEW packages will be installed:
djview-plugin iceweasel{a}
Iceweasel 115.9.1esr-1~deb10u1 is a transitional package th
Package: firefox-esr
Version: 115.9.0esr-1~deb12u1
Severity: wishlist
In the upstream issue report on this,
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680385
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680385, the last statement 38
contains “webp probably compresses just as well if not better
Package: fontconfig
Version: 2.14.1-4
Control: affects -1 font-manager
For the purpose of this bug report, let's assume you have two versions of the
same font, say, Courier New (the real name is probably irrelevant, as we only
need the same name):
/usr/share/fonts/truetype/msttcorefonts/cour.ttf
Control: found -1 3.0+dfsg1-5
Control: notfound -1 3.0+dfsg1-4
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Control: found -1 3.0+dfsg1-5
Control: notfound -1 3.0+dfsg1-4
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Control: found -1 3.0+dfsg1-5
Control: notfound -1 3.0+dfsg1-4
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
Control: tag -1 - trixie
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
X-Debbugs-Cc: laza...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:lazarus
$ rmadison lazarus -s unstable
lazarus| 2.2.6+dfsg2-2 | unstable | source, all
lazarus| 3.0+dfsg1-7 | unstable
f you need help
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
As FPC maintainer,
I would be glad to integrate any patch adding support of any arch into FPC
3.2.2.
However I'll not do the port myself.
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
On Wed, 2024-01-24 at 15:00 +0100, Michalis Kamburelis wrote:
> For a new architecture, we need to have FPC (our compil
LT_IDE_OPTIONS) $(OPT)'
+$(MAKE) --assume-new=lazbuild.lpr lazbuild$(EXEEXT) OPT='$(if
$(patsubst @%,@,${OPT}),${OPT},$(DEFAULT_IDE_OPTIONS) $(OPT))'
#---------
all: ide starter lazbuilder
--
Cheers,
Abou
Control: reassign -1 lazarus
Control: fixed -1 3.0+dfsg1-6
This issue was caused by a Lazrus bug and is now fixed.
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Control: reassign -1 lazarus
Control: fixed -1 3.0+dfsg1-6
This issue was caused by a Lazrus bug and is now fixed.
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Control: reassign -1 lazarus
Control: fixed -1 3.0+dfsg1-6
This issue was caused by a Lazrus bug and is now fixed.
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi Paul,
On Fri, 2024-01-12 at 20:12 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Abou,
>
> On 11-01-2024 20:40, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> > But this is the case of all lpk files where the binary package provide a
> > Manually compilable package while the source one provides a Com
reproduce this and fix
it.
>
> I downloaded the deb files from the lazarus website, and they did rebuild
> without errors.
Yes, this is a proof that it is just a packaging bug, which I'm going to
handle.*
>
> I am using testing.
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-4,7 +4,7 @@
-
+
But this is the case of all lpk files where the binary package provide a
Manually compilable package while the source one provides a Compile As Needed
package file.
This was the case since many years now.
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, 2023-12-31 at 10:31 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2023 at 09:08:31AM +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> > So the new changes triggered more than 2.5k lintian warning.
> > https://udd.debian.org/lintian/?packages=lazarus
>
> Are you referring to those
rst goal is to get GTK3 working for Lazarus and that is already taking all my
time.
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
vel.
Not sure if it is better to override this error for now.
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2023-12-18 at 23:07 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> > https://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Cross_compiling
> Let me check this after new Lazarus 3.0 is packaged.
I've checked support of both architecture by FPC and it seems they are only
supported in non released developme
Control: reassign -1 fp-units-win
This is an issue in fp-units-win rather than in fpc.
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
use Lazarus internal fpDebugger until we can understand
what is this issue exactly.
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
t; it complains about M-A:same reupload with those M-A:same removed?
I'll wait one day more until current version reaches testing, then upload.
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
a practical difference to any actual use case. And of course the
> answer to this question may change over time.
Please review this patch, and I'll upload it if you find it OK.
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
From 110e966d6cacc5348099af0cce728d686c4923aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Abou Al Mon
Hi Helmut,
On Sun, 2023-12-24 at 10:08 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 08:51:54AM +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> > Just like lcl, lcl-2.2 is also a virtual package.
>
> This is technically wrong. The term "virtual package" refers
et of
packages.
I would glad then to fix it.
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ginning to help debugging this.
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
d for last year already).
>
> But there are some unknown field for me about glibc to support cross
> build on fpc. Could you share some links where I should to start?
>
> Just follow this one?
> https://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Cross_compiling
Let me check this after new Lazarus 3.0 is packaged.
--
Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Dear Hilmar,
Thank you for a quick answer. Note that the version of the package NewTX (most
likely, 1.726 (cf. https://ctan.org/pkg/newtx), since all the mentioned bugs
are repaired, whereas it was not the case for a few immediately preceeding
versions) deviates from the version of the file newt
Thank you! Now all the mentioned bugs seem to be repaired.
How to find out the NewTX version shipped with Debian texlive-fonts-extra?
Running locate newtx | xargs grep -r "1\.726" returns nothing from the
system-wide directories.
(Running tlmgr info newtx as a normal user yields no results, and I
gt;
Control: tags -1 + pending On 08.09.2023 19:43, Al Ma wrote: Hi Al, > Please
upgrade NewTX to 1.726 (dated 2023-08-25). The following two > problems are
resolved there /simultenaously/: > There is no need to send package update
requests. I'm doing package updates on a regular
Even three problems are solved there. The third positive aspect of this version
is that now ≗, ≖, blackboard bold (e.g., 𝔹), ⊛, Hebrew (say, ד) , and ✓ appear
properly; cf. http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/693396 .
Package: texlive-fonts-extra
Version: 2023.20230613-2
Please upgrade NewTX to 1.726 (dated 2023-08-25). The following two problems
are resolved there simultenaously:
Two letters ij are not combined into the digraph ij; cf.
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/652108 . No excessive right-side
b
retitle 1041494 diffpdf: changes to zoom for small documents (⩽ 19 pages in at
least one file) don't take effect on ↩
thanks
You have to take small documents to reproduce this CLEANLY. Presumably at
least one of the two compared PDF files must have at most 19 pages to reproduce
this cleanly. E
Please keep open because the issue is NOT fully resolved; some coloring (bold,
blue) remains unexplained or ill-explained.
Cf. http://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/28953
http://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/28953.
However, in the meantime, there has been an update of
https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/journalctl.html
https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/journalctl.html in this
regard. The update does not fully resolve the issue but is better than nothing.
Package: texlive-plain-generic
Version: 2022.20230122-4
Severity: wishlist
As of now, the following input produces wrong formatting (cf.
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/48501
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/48501 ) when fed to pdflatex:
\documentclass{standalone} \usepackage{xcolor}
After having run
System Update (which upgraded IME Software) made by Lenovo and Windows Update
(which upgraded Windows 11 including its drivers) made by Microsoft, I still
see the error messages in the Debian journal. (Some ACPI-related stuff also
appears on the screen during boot, but it's a bi
Thanks for looking into this. The solid-state–memory device in question is
Samsung SSD 970 EVO 1TB, S/N:…, FW:2B2QEXE7, 1.00 TB. It's no longer sold on
samsung.com but still sold as new on amazon (ASIN B07CGJNLBB; the Web site says
it has been sold there since April 24, 2018). So yes, given the
Package: tracker-extract
Version: 3.4.3-1
Control: affects -1 tracker-miner-fs
In the journal of the currently stable Debian 12 we find a yellow warning
“tracker-extract[…]: Failed to create location for error reports: Keine
Berechtigung”, where “Keine Berechtigung” is German for “no permission”
As for Lenovo T14s I manage, it's of type 20T1 (in particular, not the one you
linked); its BIOS version is 1.26, released 12/14/2022. The firmware revision
is 1.14. No further BIOS upgrade is available for this very laptop as of now.
(A new Intel Management Engine Software for Windows has bee
I now checked the last machine I manage and saw similar messages having
occurred when unattended-upgrades upgraded linux-image-6.1.0-10-amd64:amd64 and
linux-image-amd64:amd64 from version 6.1.38-1 to version 6.1.38-2. The prefix
of /var/log/kern.log up to the BPF-related messages and slightly b
Package: libhpmud0
Version: 3.22.10+dfsg0-2
Control: affects -1 hplip hplip-data colord
In my journal I discovered an error
colord-sane[1000]: io/hpmud/musb.c 2101: Invalid usb_open: Permission denied
The part “io/hpmud/musb.c 2101: Invalid usb_open: Permission denied” is red.
The message appears
By the way, here's the contents of /etc/resolv.conf (which is a symlink to
/run/NetworkManager/resolv.conf):
# Generated by NetworkManager
search AnonymizedRouterName
nameserver 192.168.2.1
nameserver fe80::1%wlp3s0
wlp3s0 is the logical name of the wireless interface provided by the wireless
car
Package: avahi-daemon
Version: 0.8-10
In my journal.conf, we see this:
Jul 29 00:10:33 AnonymizedMachineName avahi-daemon[712]: Found user 'avahi'
(UID 107) and group 'avahi' (GID 117).
Jul 29 00:10:33 AnonymizedMachineName avahi-daemon[712]: Successfully dropped
root privileges.
Jul 29 00:10:33
severity 1017988 normal
found 1017988 5.66-1
thanks
Raising severity as this warning concerns more than one user. My journal has
this:
Jul 29 00:10:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: Bluetooth: hci0: BCM: firmware
Patch file not found, tried:
Jul 29 00:10:33 AnonymizedMachineName kernel: Bluetooth:
Ben, I wonder why you merged #1042237 and #1003965. The BPF messages coincide
in the almost empty lines “[…] BPF:” and coincide up to spacing in “[…] BPF:
Invalid name”. The coincidences seem to end here. Some of the remaining “[…]
BPF: …” lines are similar but, strictly speaking, different. Mor
Package: gdm3
Version: 43.0-3
The machine in question has two graphic chips:
- ASPEED AST2500 64MB built into the motherboard and
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti PCIe graphics card.
The ASPEED chip (/dev/dri/card0) has only a VGA port; nothing is connected to
this D-SUB port. The NVIDIA card (/dev/dr
In the meantime, systemd and udev have been upgraded to version
252.12-1~deb12u1 on a similar (but not identical) computer running Debian 12
stable. There, this message seems to be unconnected to printers (because no
printer is physically attached, and the only network printer is off). The
rele
1 - 100 of 1047 matches
Mail list logo
