Package: planner
Followup-For: Bug #928029
Dear Maintainer,
I experience the same problem. My system was also migrated from stretch
to buster (which seems to be the case for the first report).
Removing the configuration in .gconf/apps/planner did not resolve the
issue.
The problem seems not to e
Avviso di accesso illegale
Abbiamo notato una serie di tentativi di accesso al tuo account di posta
elettronica da un dispositivo non riconosciuto oggi lunedì 28 settembre 2020
alle 02:45.
Eri tu? In tal caso, è necessario superare la seconda verifica dell'accesso
all'Help Desk IT.
È NECESSAR
On 2020-09-25 13:39, Christian Kastner wrote:
> On 2020-09-25 11:33, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
>
>> Patches to add the expose those attributes in the MetaIndex
>> bindings are of course welcome.
So this seemed straightforward enough and I gave it a try [3], but that
didn't work unfortunately: the
Hi Stefan,
I went ahead and tagged the 1.6.2 upstream release and put the
pristine-tar deltas in the repo. Take a look when you get
the chance https://salsa.debian.org/snhardin-guest/mp3gain/ and please
feel free to nit-pick as you see fit.
Thanks,
Scott
On Sat, 25 Jul 2020 10:40:42 +0200
Stefan
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.20.5
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: hyil...@gmail.com
Some packages prompt for whether to accept the package manager's config file or
keep the one in the system (like the one shown below). It is quite common (as
was the case shown below) that the new config file is in fact
Source: tevent
Version: 0.10.2-1
Tags: patch upstream
User: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftcbfs
Thank you for applying my previous cross build patches. My previous
installment ended with:
> 5. waf has a mandatory run test for determining whether mkstemp works.
> 6. probably more
I've
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jag":
* Package name: jag
Version : 0.3.8-2
Upstream Author : XlabSoft & Industrial Infosystems
* URL : https://gitlab.com/coringao/jag/wikis
* License
Thanks Simon,
I've just tested Debian Testing (Bullseye), with src:sugar 0.117-3,
src:sugar-artwork:0.117-1, src:sugar-terminal-activity version 47-1,
src:vte2.91 version 0.62.0-1, and GTK 3.24.23-1 but do not see any
problem.
The terminal is correctly rendered in black on white or white on black
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 03:51:38PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > openjdk-13 does have the problem, so we could do another upload, but
> > given that it's not an LTS release and 14 is already available and
> > patched, do we need to?
>
> Good question. It's easy to do, and it does fix a bug, so
Package: openjdk-13
Version: 13.0.4+8-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for openjdk-13 (versioned as 13.0.4+8-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/15. Please feel free to tell me if I should
delay it longer or remove it from the queue.
Please see https://bu
Hi!
On Sun, 2020-09-27 at 22:53:13 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 08:58:00PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> > on amd64.
> >
> > > dpkg-source: error: pathname
> > > '/<>/debian/gaproot/pkg/AtlasRep'
Package: thermald
Version: 2.3-3
Severity: normal
The Homepage field points at GitHub but it should point here:
https://01.org/linux-thermal-daemon
The GitHub URL is the VCS repository not the Homepage.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digit
Package: apt-setup
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
please consider adding a sources.list configuration for
proposed-updates during the installation.
Commenting them out by default would probably be a safe default.
Cheers,
xiao sheng wen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.6
APT pref
Package: nqp-data
Version: 2020.09+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
upgrading nqp and nqp-data from 2020.06 to 2020.09 fails for me as
follows:
[...]
Unpacking nqp-data (2020.09+dfsg-1) ...
dpkg: error processing archive
/tmp/apt-dpkg-install-lsZi6y/14-nqp-data_2020.09+dfsg-1_all.deb (--unpack):
t
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 3:18 PM Tobias Frost wrote:
> If upstream is gone and won't come back you can delete the watch file.
I suggest instead to keep the watch file, but add a comment mentioning
the upstream situation.
> Did you look if there are any forks that could be new upstream?
It can al
Control: tags -1 - wontfix
Control: retitle -1 DDPO: hide Extra-Source-Only packages by default,
add option to show them
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 6:00 AM Paul Wise wrote:
> The version in experimental is ESO, so I think it is fine to hide it by
> default, perhaps with a parameter to show ESO packa
Hi,
What I can see is that
> (error "Elpy error: black not installed")
Is *black* already installed?
Cheers,
Salman
On Sun, 27 Sep 2020 21:06:17 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: elpy
> Version: 1.34.0-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
X-Debbugs-CC: lu...@debian.org mithra...@debian.org
Hi all,
Just in case you missed it: the proposed fix can be found at
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/fish/-/merge_requests/2 .
--
Regards,
Boyuan Yang
在 2020-09-27星期日的 20:56 -0400，Boyuan Yang写道：
> X-Debbugs-CC: lu...@debian.org mithra...@deb
X-Debbugs-CC: lu...@debian.org mithra...@debian.org
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:41:00 +0800 Wang Shanker <
shankerwangm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Control: severity -1 important
>
> I raise the severity to important, because under certain
circumstances, after exiting fish,
> the tty becomes totally unusab
Control: owner -1 !
Control: retitle -1 RFP: albert -- fast and flexible keyboard launcher
Since I don't have enought time to work on this, I am converting this
bug to a Request-to-package bug report.
Thanks,
Boyuan Yang
On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 12:22:58 +0800 Boyuan Yang <073p...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
Source: sysprof
Version: 3.38.0-2
We should split sysprof into separate packages, a library package, a
development headers package, etc.
The biggest benefit would be for users of GNOME Builder. GNOME Builder
integrates features from the sysprof library. Installing GNOME Builder
also gets you the
Hi Simon,
thanks for the update.
> but the GNOME team doesn't really have the resources to deal with more
> than one version (we'd prefer not to maintain mozjs78 either, but we
Neither do I have the resources and will do deail with mozjs52, and the
rest of the cinnamon team seems to have even le
I TRIED to confirm the issue in a clean VirtualBox VM, but failed.
On Debian Buster after enabling Backports, installing wireguard and confirming
that it was built by dkms, I got the same issue. Rebooting the system did not
help.
I collected more information about the dkms module, and found the
Control: retitle 908234 cjs: Please switch to mozjs78
On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 at 09:31:05 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Sep 2018 at 12:23:17 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> > Ideally, cjs would switch to using mozjs60. I understand this will
> > require coordination with the Cinnamon develope
Package: debconf-kde-helper
Version: 1.0.3-4
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I think note and error inputs add the description and the extended description
in
wrong QWidgets. The Description is added to textTE (KTextEdit) and the extended
description is added into descriptionL (QLabel). The for
Package: debconf-kde-helper
Version: 1.0.3-4
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I noticed that the debconf's kde frontend fails to handle boolean inputs
correctly. The GUI always sets the input to true/yes position even when the
value is false/no. Thus, if the current value is false/no the GUI wil
extlog_init() uses rdmsrl() to read an MSR, which on older CPUs
provokes a error message at boot:
unchecked MSR access error: RDMSR from 0x179 at rIP: 0xcd047307
(native_read_msr+0x7/0x40)
Use rdmsrl_safe() instead, and return -ENODEV if it fails.
Reported-by: j...@photojim.ca
References: h
Package: ifupdown-extra
Version: 0.31
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
the variable "VERBOSITY" is used in the file
"/etc/init.d/networking-routes" and the directory
"/etc/network/if-up.d".
Where can, may it be defined outside these places?
N.B. The repository "anonscm.debian.org/collab-ma
On Sun, 2020-09-27 at 13:43 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Answering from my phone, please excuse brevity and other netiquete
> issues such as poor quoting cleanup.
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020, at 09:14, maximilian attems wrote:
> > Dear Henrique,
> >
> > It be great to get your input,
Control: tag -1 upstream
On Sat, 2020-09-26 at 18:26 -0600, j...@photojim.ca wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 4.19.146-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Debian 4.19 kernels (unsure for how long) are giving MSR access error
> upon boot on Geode LX CPUs. (System otherwise is wor
reassign 971154 golang-go
thanks
Hi Lucas,
Thanks for reporting this.
[…]
>> ok github.com/DCSO/fever/input 15.229s
>> # github.com/DCSO/fever/processing [github.com/DCSO/fever/processing.test]
>> compile: loop
To me, this looks like a possible Go regression, though. The above seems to b
reassign 971203 dpkg-dev
severity grave
retitle dpkg-source cause gap-atlasrep to FTBFS
quit
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 08:58:00PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: gap-atlasrep
> Version: 2.1.0-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-202
Hello Tobias,
I've repacked the v2 of Zipios at salsa/debian/zipios repository. The
last package is uploaded at mentors:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/zipios++/
Could you please review and eventually sponsor the upload?
Thanks,
François
Package: nfs-utils
Version: 1:1.3.4-4
Severity: wishlist
Tag: patch
The ability to pass extra options (like --rdma) to rpc.nfsd
is currently rather obscured.
Looking at /lib/systemd/scripts/nfs-utils_env.sh,
I see that RPCNFSDOPTS is being used.
However, there is no stub for it in /etc/default/nfs
Package: grap
Version: 1.45-3
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
Misspelled words:
comarisons
retore
Trailing space:
There is a lot of instances of a space character at the end of a line.
Other mistakes:
The warnings from "mandoc -T lint" should be fixed.
-- System Information:
Debian
My hardware: Intel NUC10i7FNH1
card reader enabled in BIOS
uname: 4.19.0-11-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.19.146-1 (2020-09-17) x86_64
GNU/Linux
lspci -nn: 3b:00.0 SD Host controller [0805]: Genesys Logic, Inc Device
[17a0:9755]
I've seen this mentioned in 2 other cases:
"According to SD spec 3.00 3.6.1
Control: retitle -1 gnome-builder: FTBFS: Package polkit-gobject-1 was not
found in the pkg-config search path
On Sun, 27 Sep 2020 at 20:31:29 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
>
> Relevant part (hopefully):
The quot
Hi,
I had a similar issue / behaviour when starting AusweisApp2. Although
the cause was a little different in my case.
The reason mentioned here is
default2020.09.27 21:36:59.329 47262 W unknown(unknown:0)
: QQmlApplicationEngine
failed to load com
control: block -1 by 971139
control: block 971141 by -1
Le 27/09/2020 à 20:38, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
Source: rust-onig-sys
Version: 69.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
New installation, error was immediate
dmesg: mmc0: Unknown controller version (5). You may experience problems
mmc0: SDHCI controller on PCI [:02:00.0] using ADMA 64-bit
mmc0: 1.8V regulator output did not become st
Control: tags -1 + fixed pending
Le 27/09/2020 à 20:37, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
Source: rust-bindgen
Version: 0.51.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package fai
On Sun, 27 Sep 2020 20:36:26 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: perl6-readline
> Version: 0.1.5-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
> Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
> Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed
On 27/09/20 at 21:41 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 08:58:00PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > gpgv: unknown type of key resource 'trustedkeys.kbx'
> > > gpgv: keyblock resource '/tmp/dpkg-verify-sig.DGPbPdCb/trustedkeys.kbx':
> > > General error
> > > gpgv: Signature ma
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 08:58:00PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > gpgv: unknown type of key resource 'trustedkeys.kbx'
> > gpgv: keyblock resource '/tmp/dpkg-verify-sig.DGPbPdCb/trustedkeys.kbx':
> > General error
> > gpgv: Signature made Sat Apr 4 15:09:48 2020 UTC
> > gpgv:usi
I'd be happy to help with this package. My employer, the Wikimedia
Foundation, depends on pmacct and is happy to support Debian and free
software in general.
I'm not sure if I can immediately sign up as maintainer -- I'm an
ex-DD, and while I've re-applied for project membership, for now I
would
retitle 971118 ERROR: test_send_remove_branch
(dulwich.tests.compat.test_client.DulwichTCPClientTest)
thanks
Oops.
Control: unblock 943552 by -1
--
takari-polyglot-maven is needed to enable pomless tycho builds, so it
will be needed to enable that feature in tycho. I have now generated
the pom files manually for tracecompass, so its not blocking that
anymore.
--
Regards
Sudip
Source: r-cran-fs
Version: 1.4.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.4.2+dfsg-1
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync between testin
Source: r-cran-broom
Version: 0.5.6+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.7.0+dfsg-1
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 969494
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
Hello Lucas,
Thanks for the bug reports!
FYI, many rust-* failures are caused by a bunch of packages blocked in NEW.
Cheers,
S
Le 27/09/2020 à 20:39, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
Source: rust-syntect
Version: 3.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Userta
Source: ruby-bson
Version: 4.7.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 60 days
Source: r-cran-rstan
Version: 2.19.3-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.21.2-1
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync between testing and
Source: golang-github-sjoerdsimons-ostree-go
Version: 0.0~git20190304.5d29096-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hope
Source: grub2
Version: 2.04-8
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.04-9
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 966575
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync be
Fixed in libnet-cidr-perl 0.20:
https://github.com/svarshavchik/Net-CIDR/issues/1
Also resolves the problem in munin:
https://github.com/munin-monitoring/munin/issues/1177
Would the debian maintainer consider backporting the fix?
Source: haskell-gi-gdk
Version: 3.0.23-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpackage
> -
It looks like ncurses has dropped KEY_EVENT:
https://invisible-island.net/ncurses/NEWS.html#index-t20200817
I'll fix this upstream and produce a new package --- it's about time anyway.
On Sun, 27 Sep 2020 at 20:51, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: wordgrinder
> Version: 0.7.2-1
> Severity: serio
Source: pyqt-qwt
Version: 1.02.00-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
Source: ipywidgets
Version: 6.0.0-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Unpack source
> -
>
>
Source: rust-redox-termios
Version: 0.1.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering director
Source: pyerfa
Version: 1.7.0+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> ===
Source: golang-github-jesseduffield-go-getter
Version: 0.0~git20180822.906e156-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hop
Source: python-poppler-qt5
Version: 0.75.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpackage
> -
Source: plplot
Version: 5.15.0+dfsg-14
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering directory '/<
Source: sphinx-autoapi
Version: 1.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpackage
> --
Source: appstream-generator
Version: 0.8.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directo
Source: dput-ng
Version: 1.30
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory '/<>/docs'
>
Source: prometheus
Version: 2.20.0+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> === RUN TestNewHTTPWithServe
Source: jqueryui
Version: 1.12.1+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/
Source: haskell-gi-vte
Version: 2.91.27-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpackage
>
Source: imagemagick
Version: 8:6.9.11.24+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering dire
Source: libjs-jquery-jstree
Version: 3.3.9+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering d
Source: elpy
Version: 1.34.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> dh_
Source: mongo-c-driver
Version: 1.17.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering directory '
Source: rust-inotify-sys
Version: 0.1.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory
Source: haskell-snap-templates
Version: 1.0.0.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpackage
>
Source: libcoverart
Version: 1.0.0+git20150706-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Entering dir
Source: netkit-ntalk
Version: 0.17-16
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> dh build -
Source: ceres-solver
Version: 1.14.0-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<
Source: python-blazarclient
Version: 3.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directo
Source: gap-atlasrep
Version: 2.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Unpack source
> -
>
Source: glib-d
Version: 2.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> dh build --with
Source: onnx
Version: 1.7.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
>
Source: haskell-gi-dbusmenugtk3
Version: 0.4.9-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpackage
> -
Source: haskell-ncurses
Version: 0.2.16-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpackage
>
Source: haskell-gi-gio
Version: 2.0.27-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpackage
> -
Source: haskell-gi-gdkx11
Version: 3.0.10-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpackage
> --
Source: haskell-gi-gtk
Version: 3.0.36-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpackage
> -
Source: warzone2100
Version: 3.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering directory '/<>/
Source: rust-redox-syscall
Version: 0.1.40-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directo
Source: haskell-gi-dbusmenu
Version: 0.4.8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpackage
> -
Source: libmusicbrainz5
Version: 5.1.0+git20150707-9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Entering
Source: mina2
Version: 2.0.19-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> dh
Source: golang-github-checkpoint-restore-go-criu
Version: 4.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make
Source: texext
Version: 0.6.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> dh build --with
Source: python-dotenv
Version: 0.9.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> dh build
Source: pyqwt3d
Version: 0.1.8-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules build
> dh_testdir
> ex
Source: haskell-gi-pango
Version: 1.0.23-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpackage
> ---
Source: thrift
Version: 0.13.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[6]: Entering directory '/<>/lib/
Source: strophejs
Version: 1.2.14+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200926 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '
1 - 100 of 258 matches
Mail list logo
