Bug#931397: arm-trusted-firmware: Please provide fiptool and cert_create

Hi Vagrant, Sorry for late reply. I've tested the two tools and it works perfectly. fiptool runs good. And cert_create also works for generic tbbr. Cool. Thanks. Yours, Paul Vagrant Cascadian 於 2020/5/30 上午6:40 寫道: > Control: tags 931397 +patch > > On 2019-07-04, Ying-Chun Liu wrote: >> These 2

Bug#963156: Patch submitted

Hello Pete! On 8/5/20 1:47 AM, Pete Batard wrote: > A patch for this issue has now been submitted in: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=967918 > > A new report was created since we ultimately propose to fix > this in partman-efi instead of partman-auto. It is possible to re-ass

Bug#967930: sssd does not respect TimeoutStartUSec option in sssd-override file

Package: sssd Version: 1.16.3-3.2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, If the timeout for starting sssd is modified with an override file, this parameter is not respected and sssd fails to start too early Modification: cat /etc/systemd/system/sssd.service.d/overrride.conf [Service] TimeoutStartUSec

Bug#967929: kalarm: Doen't instal properly. It nedd instalation of Akonadi, kdepin-runtime, Kderun, etc...

Package: kalarm Version: 4:18.08.3-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)? * What was the outcome

Bug#959518: apt-transport-http: Repeatable 'Undetermined Error' during package download from snapshot.debian.org

On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 12:12:18AM +0100, James Addison wrote: > $ cmdline/apt -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update > $ cmdline/apt install -y openjdk-11-jdk While you are using the built 'apt' in this way, apt is still talking to the methods (including http) installed on your system, not th

Bug#964118: Bug corrected in 5.7.0-2

Source: linux Source-Version: 5.7.10-1 Hi, On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 10:12:21AM +0200, Erwan David wrote: > The bug is corrected in 5.7.0-2 Thanks for confirming! Regards, Salvatore

Bug#967923: dracut-network has the exact same description as dracut-core

Package: dracut-network Severity: minor X-Debbugs-Cc: die...@gnome.org It seems like dracut-network has the same description as dracut-core, without the additional: "\n.\nThis package ..." It would be helpful adding the snippet that gives some more details on what's the difference with -core. Th

Bug#967922: initramfs-tools-core: /run/cryptsetup should be configure with /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/cryptsetup.conf

Package: initramfs-tools-core Version: 0.137 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: die...@gnome.org cryptsetup expects the `/run/cryptsetup` directory to exist, and according to upstream the preferred way to get it to exist is with a tmpfiles.d file: https://gitlab.com/cryptsetup/cryptsetup/-/merge_req

Bug#967921: dracut-core: Missing tmpfiles.d/cryptsetup.conf triggers cryptsetup "WARNING: Locking directory /run/cryptsetup is missing!" warning

Package: dracut-core Version: 050+65-1 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: die...@gnome.org It seems like dracut is forgetting to include /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/cryptsetup.conf in the initrd image, which in turn means that cryptsetup has to create its locking directory on the fly: ``` systemd[1]: Star

Bug#966537: ITP: tomboy-ng -- Cross Platform Notes

On 3/8/20 1:28 pm, Ben Hutchings wrote: (topic of making a gtk2 v Qt5 ...) > I am only talking about what should be done in an official Debian > package here. It you build a generic binary for Linux then Gtk+ 2 may > well be the better option. I am talking specificially about Buster and Bulls

Bug#967752: sopwith: depends on deprecated GTK 2

Ok, this is on my list. Not sure exactly how soon I'll get to it, but it won't be too long. KEN

Bug#967920: Acknowledgement (debian-installer: ewq)

Sorry, I can't figure out how to retitle the bug. I can't seem able to email a single line instead of two lines to control@ so it can't retitle the bug: "EFI: Improve Apple/Mac experience with proper volume icon, label, description and selectability of installation media" Also the original title

Bug#967920: debian-installer: ewq

Package: debian-installer Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: die...@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Diego Escalante Urrelo To: Debian Bug Tracking System Subject: debian-installer: EFI: Improve Apple/Mac experience with p

Bug#967919: kernel panic at boot

Package: linux-image-4.19.0-10-amd64 Version: 4.19.132-1 Severity: critical Causes a kernel panic at boot. I have only managed to capture The bottom lines of the panic message. A screen shot is at https://imgur.com/a/ETtMtT2 . Both linux-image-4.19.0-9-amd64 4.19.118-2+deb10u1 and linux-image-4.

Bug#746966: HiDPI support

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 7:04 PM Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Diego Escalante, le mar. 04 août 2020 18:55:40 -0500, a ecrit: > > The GRUB prompt indeed took over the efifb resolution, but because it was > > using the default font, it was really tiny text. > > Mmm, so on your system the resolution you

Bug#966172: possible fix

I'm wondering if the error gcc is throwing is really a valid error. These mismatches are coming because an INGEGER*8 is being passed via %VAL() so this is actually passing by value (instead of the usual fortran pass-by-reference). For the first error at line 248, - PIXMAP is initialised by a GRG

Bug#746966: HiDPI support

Diego Escalante, le mar. 04 août 2020 18:55:40 -0500, a ecrit: > The GRUB prompt indeed took over the efifb resolution, but because it was > using the default font, it was really tiny text. Mmm, so on your system the resolution you are getting in grub is already high and thus tiny text there? Tha

Bug#746966: HiDPI support

On mié, ago 5, 2020 at 12:50 am, Samuel Thibault wrote: Hello, Diego Escalante Urrelo, le mar. 04 août 2020 17:39:34 -0500, a ecrit: I was trying to figure out how to fix this Mmm, actually this should already be fixed, in the context of #910227. In the latest images we just keep the gr

Bug#963156: Patch submitted

A patch for this issue has now been submitted in: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=967918 A new report was created since we ultimately propose to fix this in partman-efi instead of partman-auto.

Bug#967918: [PATCH] Remount /cdrom read-write if it also happens to be used as /boot/efi

Package: partman-efi Severity: important Tags: d-i Some installation processes (e.g. The installation of vanilla Debian ARM64 on a Raspberry Pi 4 in UEFI mode) greatly benefit from extracting the Debian installation files from mini.iso or netinst.iso into an ESP and then using that same ESP fo

Bug#859458: Because of displays with very high dpi, not only the keyboard, but the font has to be configured early

Package: console-setup Followup-For: Bug #859458 X-Debbugs-Cc: die...@gnome.org I seem unable to reproduce in my current unstable/sid system. At first I thought it was because I had switched to `dracut`, but seems like I can't reproduce the original issue with `initramfs-tools`. Perhaps something

Bug#959518: apt-transport-http: Repeatable 'Undetermined Error' during package download from snapshot.debian.org

Package: apt,snapshot.debian.org Followup-For: Bug #959518 X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@jp-hosting.net FWIW, the series of steps in use for repro are: # prereq: install apt compile-time dependencies # prereq: add apt deb sources, keys as per docs at http://snapshot.debian.org/ $ git clone "https://salsa.de

Bug#967857: debian-policy: [Files/Permissions and owners] files installed by package manager should not be writable

On Tue, 2020-08-04 at 23:50 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Tue, 2020-08-04 at 13:56:45 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > > Ansgar writes: > > > 10.9 Permissions and owners currently says > > > > Files should be owned by root:root, and made writable only by the > > > > owner and universally readable (

Bug#746966: HiDPI support

Hello, Diego Escalante Urrelo, le mar. 04 août 2020 17:39:34 -0500, a ecrit: > I was trying to figure out how to fix this Mmm, actually this should already be fixed, in the context of #910227. In the latest images we just keep the grub resolution, which in my tests is fine. That's lazy of course,

Bug#967917: blk-availability.service: Cannot add dependency job, ignoring: Unit blk-availability.service has a bad unit file setting.

Package: lvm2 Version: 2.03.09-2 Severity: normal I'm seeing these errors messages in my logs every hour: Aug 4 14:30:33 systemd[1]: blk-availability.service: Cannot add dependency job, ignoring: Unit blk-availability has a bad unit file setting. Aug 4 14:34:28 systemd[1]: blk-availabili

Bug#967912: texlive-luatex: file conflict with old texlive-latex-extra package

Hi Sven, > | Entpacken von texlive-luatex (2020.20200804-1) über (2020.20200629-1) ... > | dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten des Archivs > /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-78owrZ/04-texlive-luatex_2020.20200804-1_all.deb > (--unpack): > | Versuch, »/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/scripts/cloze/cloze.lua« zu > ü

Bug#957959: wmxres: diff for NMU version 1.2-10.2

On 8/2/20 1:24 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > Control: tags 957959 + patch > Control: tags 957959 + pending > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for wmxres (versioned as 1.2-10.2) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I > should cancel it. > > Added Doug Torrance

Bug#746966: HiDPI support

Package: debian-installer Followup-For: Bug #746966 X-Debbugs-Cc: die...@gnome.org I was trying to figure out how to fix this so that there's a smarter default that figures out if the screen is way too "big" (hinting that it is HIDPI). I thought this should go in console-setup, but perhaps it rat

Bug#959518: apt-transport-http: Repeatable 'Undetermined Error' during package download from snapshot.debian.org

Package: apt,snapshot.debian.org Followup-For: Bug #959518 X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@jp-hosting.net Thanks for the update! - the issue *does* remain reproducible at the moment, and unfortunately cherry-picking the fix (merge commit 7d22263) into the 1.8.2.z branch and building a version of apt from there

Bug#965098: please remove geda-gaf from the archive

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 08:47:39AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > > There are two reverse dependencies on geda-gaf, gspiceui, and > > contrib/easyspice. Both appear to be maintained by Gudjon > > I. Gudjonsson, who I will CC. > > Please remove the moreinfo tag from this bug once these packages have

Bug#967915: Depends on geda-gaf

Package: gspiceui Severity: serious geda-gaf is scheduled for removal (#965098) and gspiceui depends on it. Quoting Bdale in the RM bug above: It looks like the last gspiceui upstream release was in late 2018, and the only reason it depends on geda-gaf is that it wants to use gnetlist to impor

Bug#967916: Depends on geda-gaf

Package: easyspice Severity: serious geda-gaf is scheduled for removal (#965098) and easyspice depends on it. Cheers, Moritz

Bug#966575: How to fix LLVM/LUKS installs?

On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 05:08:44PM -0400, Todd Howe wrote: > ls /media/root/$UUID > apt install grub > grub-install --root-directory=/media/root/$UUID /dev/sda I generally don't recommend this sort of approach. Instead, and simpler: for x in dev proc sys; do mount --rbind "/$x" "/media/roo

Bug#967857: debian-policy: [Files/Permissions and owners] files installed by package manager should not be writable

Guillem Jover writes: > On Tue, 2020-08-04 at 13:56:45 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: >> I assume this is in support of systems, containers, or jails where UID >> 0 may not have CAP_FOWNER? > If that's the reason, it certainly was not clear from the original > report. :) It seems like the context i

Bug#967857: debian-policy: [Files/Permissions and owners] files installed by package manager should not be writable

On Tue, 2020-08-04 at 13:56:45 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Ansgar writes: > > 10.9 Permissions and owners currently says > > > | Files should be owned by root:root, and made writable only by the > > | owner and universally readable (and executable, if appropriate), > > | that is mode 644 or 755.

Bug#966557: Blacklist nvidia-modeset and nvidia-drm

On 8/4/20 1:49 AM, Felix Dörre wrote: > I've got a slight clue, what could be wrong here: > > The posted update-glx --display glx shows the following line: [...] > but none libGLX_nvidia.so.0. From the maintainer-script however having [...] > I hope this helps to understand what's wrong in this ca

Bug#957029: ax25mail-utils: ftbfs with GCC-10

Re: David Ranch > > Do you think you can resolve the gcc 10 issues (-fcommon is the > > default now) and put up a new release we can package? > > Hmmm.. I don't have any systems that run GCC 10 today. Do either of these > packages NOT compile on your desired system? What Debian OS version are >

Bug#967914: topplot: missing dependency on python3-tk

Package: topplot Version: 0.0.4-2 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: ma...@straka.info There is missing dependency on python3-tk Otherwise: >>topplot Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/topplot", line 63, in from topplot_.graphs import Grapher, rcParams File "/usr/lib/pyth

Bug#957029: ax25mail-utils: ftbfs with GCC-10

Hello Christoph, I was glancing at the SF.net repo for ax25mail-utils but thought I had seen the last commit in 2018. Sorry for being sloppy there. Ok, good that you see it now. Do you think you can resolve the gcc 10 issues (-fcommon is the default now) and put up a new release we can p

Bug#967857: debian-policy: [Files/Permissions and owners] files installed by package manager should not be writable

On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 02:15:59PM +0200, Ansgar wrote: > Package: debian-policy > > Hi, > > 10.9 Permissions and owners currently says > > | Files should be owned by root:root, and made writable only by the > | owner and universally readable (and executable, if appropriate), > | that is mode 64

Bug#967901: lower memory usage for riscv build

Hey Aurélien, Jonas, thanks for the replies Le 04/08/2020 à 19:11, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Closing this bugreport does not imply that conversation is closed, only > that with the currently presented material there is no further action. > We can continue the conversation in a "closed" bugre

Bug#966573: awscli: aws cli v2

I spent a little bit of time on this today. Here are my findings so far. First, awscli v2 depends on a python-botocore v2, which isn't yet officially released upstream. It does seem reasonable to package it, but the blast radius is large enough that it's important to be careful to avoid regressi

Bug#957037: biboumi: ftbfs with GCC-10

On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 10:57:04 + Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: src:biboumi > Version: 8.3-1 > Severity: normal > Tags: sid bullseye > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-10 > > Please keep this issue open in the bug tracker for the package it > was filed for. If a fix in

Bug#966575: How to fix LLVM/LUKS installs?

tl;dr I hit this error while trying to reinstall grub: grub-probe: error: can't mount encrypted volume '/dev/sda5': no such partition Hello, we've seen fixes suggested for non-encrypted installs which involve either reinstalling grub or running dpkg-configure grub-pc from chroot. How do we go abo

Bug#967857: debian-policy: [Files/Permissions and owners] files installed by package manager should not be writable

Ansgar writes: > 10.9 Permissions and owners currently says > | Files should be owned by root:root, and made writable only by the > | owner and universally readable (and executable, if appropriate), > | that is mode 644 or 755." > However most files shouldn't be modified as modifications will j

Bug#966885: spring: FTBFS: SHA512.cpp:25:3: error: ‘snprintf’ was not declared in this scope

Package: spring Version: 104.0+dfsg-6 Followup-For: Bug #966885 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu groovy ubuntu-patch Hi Markus, Attached is a patch for this issue which I have uploaded to Ubuntu, to unblock the icu67 transition. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek

Bug#967341: firefox-esr: depends on deprecated GTK 2

tag 967341 + wontfix thanks On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 11:37:43AM +0100, s...@debian.org wrote: > A few packages extend GTK 2 by providing plugins (theme engines, input > methods, etc.) or themes, for example ibus and mate-themes. If these > packages deliberately support GTK 2 even though it is depre

Bug#967906: systemd 246 resolvconf path unit

Am 04.08.20 um 20:14 schrieb Michael Biebl: > Am 04.08.20 um 19:14 schrieb Kai Lüke: >> Hi, >> >> in my case this was caused by the resolvconf-pull-resolved.path unit >> which continuously triggered the resolvconf-pull-resolved.service unit. >> >> I checked if the trigger was valid but there were n

Bug#957029: ax25mail-utils: ftbfs with GCC-10

> The last commit for ax25mail-utils was back in late December 2019 and April > 11th 2020 for Linpac so I wouldn't call these as "very much dead upstream". Hi David, thanks for the feedback! I was glancing at the SF.net repo for ax25mail-utils but thought I had seen the last commit in 2018. Sorr

Bug#967340: firefox: depends on deprecated GTK 2

tag 967340 + wontfix thanks On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 11:37:39AM +0100, s...@debian.org wrote: > A few packages extend GTK 2 by providing plugins (theme engines, input > methods, etc.) or themes, for example ibus and mate-themes. If these > packages deliberately support GTK 2 even though it is depre

Bug#957029: ax25mail-utils: ftbfs with GCC-10

Hello Chris, I am the current gatekeeper for this package written by a previous developer with significant help from others. Have you reviewed the current GIT "develop" branch: https://sourceforge.net/p/ax25mail/ax25mail-utils/ci/develop/tree/ same can be said for the Linpac package: h

Bug#880437: libglade2: diff for NMU version 1:2.6.4-2.1

On Tue, 04 Aug 2020 at 20:56:46 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: > On Tue, 4 Aug 2020 20:24:40 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: > > I've prepared an NMU for libglade2 (versioned as 1:2.6.4-2.1) and > > uploaded it to the archive. It fixes #967157, #936867, and #880437. > > Except not, because I forgot to upd

Bug#953098: xscreensaver: Crashes with XIO: fatal IO error

I was running xscreensaver continuously for a couple of months but could not reproduce. If nobody else can reproduce and you cannot provide more information I must at least lower the severity of this bug report. Regards, Tormod On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:29 PM Tormod Volden wrote: > > Jens, the

Bug#957698: pommed: diff for NMU version 1.39~dfsg-5.1

Control: tags 957698 + patch Control: tags 957698 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for pommed (versioned as 1.39~dfsg-5.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. -- Regards Sudip diff -Nru pommed-1.39~dfsg/debian/changelog pommed-1.39~dfs

Bug#967892: xscreensaver: depends on deprecated libglade2

I looked at the above-mentioned "porting guide" and optimistically started on the C code changes, which appear easy enough. Please see attached patch which at least compiles. For testing it I tried gtk-builder-convert but this was not enough, see error messages below. Maybe someone familiar with th

Bug#964013: lintian: embedded-javascript-library should flag sphinx files too

Hi Andreas and all! On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 06:55:08PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Hi, > > I stumbled upon this while trying to fix > > W: pocl-doc: embedded-javascript-library > usr/share/doc/pocl-doc/html/_static/language_data.js please use sphinx > > language_data.js seems to be a false

Bug#967913: RFS: cglm/0.7.7-1 -- Optimized OpenGL Mathematics library for C

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cglm": * Package name: cglm Version : 0.7.7-1 Upstream Author : Recep Aslantas * URL : https://github.com/recp/cglm * License : Expat * Vcs

Bug#880437: libglade2: diff for NMU version 1:2.6.4-2.1

On Tue, 4 Aug 2020 20:24:40 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote: > I've prepared an NMU for libglade2 (versioned as 1:2.6.4-2.1) and > uploaded it to the archive. It fixes #967157, #936867, and #880437. Except not, because I forgot to update my key in the keyring and it’s expired. Ho hum... Regards, Step

Bug#966459: linux: traffic class socket options (both IPv4/IPv6) inconsistent with docs/standards

On Mon, 3 Aug 2020, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > keep the code I currently have that compares byte 0 and 3, using Actually not. I’ve added some debugging code with… static size_t cmsg_actual_data_len(const struct cmsghdr *cmsg) { union { const struct cmsghdr *cmsg;

Bug#967911: aptitude: aptitude-changelog-parser leaves garbage on the screen

Control: tags -1 patch Hi! On Tue, 2020-08-04 at 20:09:05 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > Package: aptitude > Version: 0.8.13-1+b1 > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: Sven Joachim , Guillem Jover > > When viewing the Debian changelog of bash in aptitude's TUI, I saw the > screen flash and then err

Bug#957645: oroborus: diff for NMU version 2.0.20+nmu1

Control: tags 957645 + patch Control: tags 957645 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for oroborus (versioned as 2.0.20+nmu1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. -- Regards Sudip diff -Nru oroborus-2.0.20/debian/changelog oroborus-2.0.20+

Bug#967464: grsync: depends on deprecated GTK 2

Control: tags -1 upstream fixed-upstream Control: forwarded -1 https://sourceforge.net/p/grsync/patches/6/ See the commit https://sourceforge.net/p/grsync/code/164/. There is preliminary support for GTK 3. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#966544: snmpd: extend option broken after update

Hi, Thanks to the LTS team for resolving for those on stretch. Kind regards James Greig

Bug#967912: texlive-luatex: file conflict with old texlive-latex-extra package

Package: texlive-luatex Version: 2020.20200804-1 Severity: serious There was a hiccup installing your package (sorry for the German): , | Entpacken von texlive-luatex (2020.20200804-1) über (2020.20200629-1) ... | dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten des Archivs /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-78owrZ/04-texli

Bug#957029: ax25mail-utils: ftbfs with GCC-10

Control: tags -1 upstream wontfix > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -Wall -g > -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat > -Werror=format-security -c axgetlist.c > In file included from /usr/include/string.h:495, > from axge

Bug#957360: insighttoolkit4: ftbfs with GCC-10

Greeting, On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 08:45:35 +0200 Étienne Mollier wrote: > Arf, no dice, there might be more changes needed, including > maybe: > * reviewing cmake build dependencies metainformations, as in > the upstream commit documented in a previous entry, which > makes me wonder whether

Bug#880437: libglade2: diff for NMU version 1:2.6.4-2.1

Package: libglade2 Version: 1:2.6.4-2 Severity: normal Tags: patch pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for libglade2 (versioned as 1:2.6.4-2.1) and uploaded it to the archive. It fixes #967157, #936867, and #880437. Regards, Stephen diff -Nru libglade2-2.6.4/debian/changelog libglade

Bug#956973: 4store: diff for NMU version 1.1.6+20151109-2.1

Quoting Sudip Mukherjee (2020-08-04 20:04:23) > Control: tags 956973 + patch > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for 4store (versioned as 1.1.6+20151109-2.1). The > diff is attached to this message. Great. Thanks! Feel free to release the NMU without delay. - Jonas -- * Jonas S

Bug#964446: sane-airscan stuck in NEW

Great, so I will base my Ubuntu package also on the new version. OdyX, could you update the Debian packaging appropriately, too? Thanks. Till On 04/08/2020 20:10, Alexander Pevzner wrote: I think I will merge -unstable in few hours and will release result as 0.99.12. It would be nice, if De

Bug#967906: systemd 246 resolvconf path unit

Am 04.08.20 um 19:14 schrieb Kai Lüke: > Hi, > > in my case this was caused by the resolvconf-pull-resolved.path unit > which continuously triggered the resolvconf-pull-resolved.service unit. > > I checked if the trigger was valid but there were no write events which > should cause the trigger: >

Bug#967911: aptitude: aptitude-changelog-parser leaves garbage on the screen

Package: aptitude Version: 0.8.13-1+b1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: Sven Joachim , Guillem Jover When viewing the Debian changelog of bash in aptitude's TUI, I saw the screen flash and then error messages from aptitude-changelog-parser appeared scattered across the screen, redrawing the screen

Bug#956973: 4store: diff for NMU version 1.1.6+20151109-2.1

Control: tags 956973 + patch Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for 4store (versioned as 1.1.6+20151109-2.1). The diff is attached to this message. -- Regards Sudip diff -Nru 4store-1.1.6+20151109/debian/changelog 4store-1.1.6+20151109/debian/changelog --- 4store-1.1.6+20151109/debian/chang

Bug#967910: linux-image-4.19.0-10-amd64: loud audio crackling after each audio playback (regression)

Package: src:linux Version: 4.19.132-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, I upgraded my Debian from linux-image-4.19.0-9-amd64 to linux- image-4.19.0-10-amd64. After each sound output (playing a video in mpv, playing a sound file in Clementine, testing the speakers in the Audio Settings Plasma

Bug#967906: 246-2 gobbles CPU

Am 04.08.20 um 18:29 schrieb 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson: > Package: systemd > Version: 246-2 > Severity: important > >>From the moment of installation, it gobbles the CPU and won't let go. > > $ top > PID USER PR NIVIRTRESSHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > 1 root 20 0

Bug#967212: solfege: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye

Hello Matthias, the python2 dependency may be dh-python, but I doubt it actually depends on python2 because there is no dh-python3 package. As indirect dependency, lilypond package depends on python2. Could you please confirm that this bug is only because of lilypond? Thanks, François signa

Bug#967908: awscli: python3-botocore dependency too permissive

Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 12:31:53PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > It seems that a newer python3-botocore package (at least 1.13.8) is > required with newer versions of awscli. References: Confirmed that it doesn't work with the version in buster. It doesn't seem

Bug#879151: debian-ports support when setting up sources.list

Le dimanche 2 août à 00h 13mn 59s (+0200), John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit : > Hi! > > On 8/2/20 12:16 AM, jhcha54008 wrote: > >>> + is_ports_architecture=$(cat /usr/lib/choose-mirror/port_architecture) > >> Is there any good reason for this to be a subshell instead of read(1)? > > > > This sy

Bug#967906: systemd 246 resolvconf path unit

Hi, in my case this was caused by the resolvconf-pull-resolved.path unit which continuously triggered the resolvconf-pull-resolved.service unit. I checked if the trigger was valid but there were no write events which should cause the trigger:   inotifywait -m -e modify /run/systemd/resolve/stub-

Bug#966504: emacs-ivy: should suggest not recommend elpa-smex

Hello, On Tue 04 Aug 2020 at 08:04AM -04, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > By the way, I concede that choosing not to censure the > human element of my changelog entry makes it appear that the decision > was possibly an "emotional" rather than "rational" one. Given the > prevalence of negative and d

Bug#967901: lower memory usage for riscv build

Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2020-08-04 18:17:07) > Control: tags -1 wontfix > > Quoting Sebastien Bacher (2020-08-04 17:29:21) > > Could you add riscv64 to the list of architecture where build needs > > a reduced memory usage? The change has been added to Ubuntu and is > > the only delta between t

Bug#966544: snmpd: extend option broken after update

Hi Felix and all, On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 08:37:17AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Felix and all, > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 03:36:54PM +0200, Felix Sperling wrote: > > Hi, > > > > we were also effected from the update 5.7.3+dfsg-1.7+deb9u2 causing lots of > > broken icinga checks. >

Bug#964248: base-installer: Pass "--extra-suites=unreleased" to debootstrap on ports arches

Le vendredi 31 juillet à 13h 15mn 58s (+0200), Samuel Thibault a écrit : > наб, le ven. 31 juil. 2020 12:50:45 +0200, a ecrit: > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:00:26PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > jhcha54008, le mar. 28 juil. 2020 10:39:40 +0200, a ecrit: > > > > I wonder if the versioned depe

Bug#966621: Many people have entire music collections on /var/tmp

Many people have entire music collections on /var/tmp. So at least they should be asked upon upgrade if they are aware that it is about to get suddenly wiped out.

Bug#962294: RFS: btrfs-progs/5.7-1~bpo10+1 -- Checksumming Copy on Write Filesystem utilities

Control: retitle -1 RFS: btrfs-progs/5.7-1~bpo10+1 -- Checksumming Copy on Write Filesystem utilities Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "btrfs-progs": * Package name: btrfs-progs Version : 5.7-1~bpo10+1 Upstream Author : linux-bt...@vger.kernel.org * UR

Bug#967909: editline: Please remove in favour of libedit

Source: editline Severity: important Control: block -1 by 966383 editline has not been updated in several years and could be removed in favour of libedit. The only remaining user is ftp-ssl which already has a patch to build with libedit in #966383.

Bug#967907: ITP: nitrotool - Easy handling of NitroKey HSM USB Smard Card

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: nitrotool Version : 0.0~git Upstream Author : Johannes Bauer * URL : https://github.com/johndoe31415/nitrotool * License : GPLv3 Programming Lang: Python Package source : https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/

Bug#967906: 246-2 gobbles CPU

Package: systemd Version: 246-2 Severity: important >From the moment of installation, it gobbles the CPU and won't let go. $ top PID USER PR NIVIRTRESSHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 1 root 20 0 103668 11708 8708 R 81.2 0.2 10:35.94 systemd 5401 ro

Bug#967908: awscli: python3-botocore dependency too permissive

Package: awscli Version: 1.18.99-1 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 The permissions of the awscli package call for python3-botocore (>= 1.12.103). This makes it possible to install the testing/unstable version of the package on stable (buster). However, every inv

Bug#967633: [Mlt-devel] Fwd: Bug#967633: mlt: depends on deprecated GTK 2

oh thank you. Then I will remove the dependencies :) Am 04.08.20 um 18:14 schrieb Dan Dennedy: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 9:12 AM Patrick Matthäi > wrote: > > Hi Dan, > > any doubts about deactivating gtk2? It is also marked as > deprecated (src/modules/gtk

Bug#967775: tilp2: depends on deprecated GTK 2

Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/debrouxl/tilp_and_gfm/pull/30 I haven't tried it, but there is a pull request from a contributor that appears to finish the GTK 3 support. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#967903: nmu: cod-tools_3.0.1+dfsg-1 macromoleculebuilder_3.2+dfsg-1

Control: reassign -1 release.debian.org On Ma, 04 aug 20, 18:34:46, mer...@debian.org wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: binnmu > > Hello,

Bug#967633: [Mlt-devel] Fwd: Bug#967633: mlt: depends on deprecated GTK 2

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 9:12 AM Patrick Matthäi wrote: > Hi Dan, > > any doubts about deactivating gtk2? It is also marked as deprecated > (src/modules/gtk2/deprecated) > Deprecation is deactivation in the MLT configure script. For the latest release you must remove that file to activate that mod

Bug#967905: glibc: Provide a libc6-lse package on arm64

Source: glibc Version: 2.31-2 Severity: wishlist User: de...@kali.org Usertags: origin-kali X-Debbugs-Cc: st...@kali.org, rbal...@ubuntu.com Hello, in Kali we are providing many images for ARM devices and some of the ARM devices that we support have support for the LSE (Large System Extensions) a

Bug#951048: util-linux: please build with dm-verity support when uploading 2.35

Hi Luca, * Luca Boccassi [200730 11:27]: > Helmut reviewed and approved the MR (thanks!)[0], anything else left to do > for this? > > [0] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/util-linux/-/merge_requests/16#note_183169 TBH, after the initial issues, I feel quite uncomfortable enabling this feature a

Bug#879151: debian-ports support when setting up sources.list

X-Debbugs-CC: Samuel Thibault Hi, here is a revised proposal of a patch for this bug report. It is supposed that the relevant part [2] of the patch proposal [1] for bug #964248 is applied. I hope it will help to find a solution. Regards, JH Chatenet [1] : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug

Bug#967904: Put file:///usr/share/doc/im.... on its own line

Package: imagemagick-6.q16 Version: 8:6.9.11.24+dfsg-1 Severity: minor File: /usr/share/man/man1/import-im6.q16.1.gz We read OVERVIEW The import-im6.q16 program is a member of the ImageMagick-ims6.q16(1) suite of tools. Use it to capture some or all of an X server screen and s

Bug#967088: fflas-ffpack: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/linbox-team/fflas-ffpack/issues/282 Control: tags -1 pending On 8/4/20 3:11 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: == FFLAS-FFPACK 2.4.3: tests/test-suite.log == # TOTAL: 40 # P

Bug#879147: debian-ports support when installing the kernel and extra packages

Hi, Here is an updated patch proposal. It is supposed that the relevant parts [2] of the patch proposal [1] for bug #964248 are applied. I hope it will help to find a solution. Regards, JH Chatenet [1] : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964248#52 [2] : Here is an excerpt of t

Bug#967901: lower memory usage for riscv build

control: retitle -1 lower memory usage for riscv build in ubuntu On 2020-08-04 17:29, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Package: pandoc > Version: 2.9.1.1-3 > Tags: patch > > Could you add riscv64 to the list of architecture where build needs a > reduced memory usage? The change has been added to Ubuntu

Bug#967903: nmu: cod-tools_3.0.1+dfsg-1 macromoleculebuilder_3.2+dfsg-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hello, I want to request binNMU on amd64 for recently accepted new packages, as they are not migrated to testing

  1   2   3   >