Additional issue:
#23) syslinux does not apply kernel version filtering to multi-flavour
scenarios
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Additional issue:
#23) d syslinux does not apply kernel version filtering to multi-flavour
scenarios
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Boot method: USB
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-lxde-CD-1.iso
Date: 2015-01-05 05:45
Machine: Asus X101CH
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot:[O]
Dete
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.16.7-ckt2-1
Severity: important
While working on my X1 Carbon (haswell) laptop this morning my screen frooze,
but keyboard was still working. I managed to contact my laptop from another
laptop
and get the kernel log I've replaced below. I forgot to get error state,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi!
Even if ooniprobe is more or less usable in its current state, I think
it is not yet ready to be part of a stable release. #766061 makes a bad
user experience and the software is still elvol
Sorry -- I should have said "menu-bar has disappeared"
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System
wrote:
> Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
>
> This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
> has been received.
>
> Your message is being f
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 03:44:49 +0100 "emil.widm...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> pleace don't ditch grub-legacy if not necessary
I managed to completely overlook your message somehow. Please state a
(good) reason.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
Subject: libreoffice: Menus have disappeared in LO
Package: libreoffice
Version: 1:4.3.3-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Menus have disappeared from libreoffice
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
For
Package: systemd
Version: 215-9
Severity: normal
# grep auditallow local.te
auditallow domain tmpfs_t:dir create;
# grep granted /var/log/audit/audit.log
type=AVC msg=audit(1421563773.398:239): avc: granted { create } for pid=4302
comm="systemd" name="systemd" scontext=system_u:system_r:init_t
On Sat, 2015-01-17 at 00:21 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> control: severity 774468 minor
...
> So this is not so urgent/important issue which requires a new upload
> just for this documentation bug during the late freeze period.
> Its a minor documentation bug.
Agreed for debmake but for pbuilder th
Looks like:
https://github.com/sampsyo/beets/commit/80038e2a3fe6f5ac174a30f6fd01ebf8dd63e414
SR
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
+1 415 683 3272
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@li
(forgot to cc the bug, here's a copy)
> I did not find that problem in my tests. But that can be explained by
> saying that my initial tests were done with live-build-4.0.
The problem also exists in 4.x. For my text amd64 sid build using grub2,
I have the following grub2 menu entries:
- Debian G
Package: awstats
Followup-For: Bug #626185
Okay, so these are the exact steps how to reproduce this, using a
QEMU/KVM virtual machine running the latest Debian/Stable.
If you still can't reproduce this, please provide the Apache log line
you got instead, so I can analyze why you can't reproduce t
On 01/15/2015 01:44 PM, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Jan 15 2015, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> But at least we should replace java2-runtime-headless with
>> java6-runtime-headless.
>
> That's great and would, at least, make it clear that once installed, at
> least the basics of clojure would work.
I hav
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 16:49 +, Philipp Hug wrote:
> Yes, I'll enable ssl on it.
I've committed the change to the donations page, when SSL is available,
please either commit the change to webwml or poke me about it. If you
would prefer not to pay for the SSL cert, you could use this offer:
ht
reassign 775638 geoip-database 20141027-1
retitle 775638 IPv6 database is corrupt
severity 775638 grave
thanks
Hi,
thanks
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 01:44:44AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
> sid chroot), your package failed to b
Package: gnome-shell
Version: 3.14.2-3+b1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
My computer is a Sony VAIO VPCEA45FL laptop, with 9 different brightness
levels.
The brightness slider on the shell's top panel moves uncontrollably when trying
to adjust screen brightness.
* What led up
Hi Ian!
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 3:37 AM, Ian Jackson
wrote:
>
> Anyway, I'm a bit puzzled. I uploaded a new version of this package
> in November 2014 and it built fine. tcl8.4-dev seemed to be available
> then. I deliberately did not update it to build-depend on 8.5 because
> I wanted to avoi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dmitry Bogatov
* Package name: haskell-formatting
Version : 6.1.1
Upstream Author : Chris Done
* URL : http://hackage.haskell.org/package/formatting
* License : BSD3
Programming Lang: Haskell
Description : Type s
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dmitry Bogatov
* Package name: haskell-text-format
Version : 0.3.1.1
Upstream Author : Bryan O'Sullivan
* URL : https://hackage.haskell.org/package/text-format
* License : BSD3
Programming Lang: Haskell
Description
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> That said, debbugs hasn't seen an upload to unstable since 2003, and
> the upload in experimental was in 2010 (the patch should apply to git
> without many changes)... maybe it shouldn't ship with Jessie?
Yeah, I'm trying to figure that out myself; I
On 2015-01-18 02:09, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
> send it to 775...@bugs.debian.org.
I can't tell from this (closed) bug-report:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710865
whether this was the same issue and
El 17/01/15 a las 02:21, jnqnfe escribió:
On 15/01/2015 14:52, adrian15 wrote:
I just write down here that I will have to review your mentioned: #1,
#2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8 and #9 in my (#757883) (support for
loopback.cfg file) so that it matches your improvements and fixes.
No problem, I w
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.16.7-ckt2-1
Followup-For: Bug #696223
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Upgrading system
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
Boot into system
* What was the outcome of this action?
Key
Control: tags -1 +patch
On 2015-01-10, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> a test with piuparts revealed that your package uses files from
> /usr/share/doc in its maintainer scripts which is a violation of
> Policy 12.3: "Packages must not require the existence of any files in
> /usr/share/doc/ in order to
Subject: ed: Use upstream "red" script rather than link
Package: ed
Version: 1.6-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
With the upstream change from v1.4 to v1.5, ed(1) no longer
recognizes "red" as a name under which restricted mode will be
invoked.
$ echo hello > example.txt
$ # errant behavio
Dear mentors,
In the time that this request has been sitting here there have been two
new upstream versions released. Since this tool depends on many external
(website) APIs which are constantly in flux, it needs to be updated
relatively often to keep pace.
Is it best if I package these one versi
Package: ntfs-3g
Version: 1:2014.2.15AR.3-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
I'm trying to rsync a directory from ext4 to ntfs but I get constantly crash
It happens also after windows chkdsk
here out/gdb info:
Reading symbols from ntfs-3g...Reading symbols from
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/7e/eea
Le dimanche 18 janvier 2015 à 01:42 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> 8<
http://aws-logs.debian.net/ftbfs-logs/2015/01/17/node-tap_0.4.13-1_jessie.log
I'd like to know the output of
nodejs -e "console.log(process.platform)"
on that build machine, to see if it is nodejs that sets a wron
Package: iceweasel
Version: 35.0-1
Severity: important
Hi.
Since I've upgraded to 35, I've experienced multiple issues.
- One of them is the breakage of search load options, which I've
already reported in #775391.
- Another was that the search bar didn't work anymore at all
(i.e. hitting enter
Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Bug#775635: chiark-tcl: FTBFS in jessie:
build-dependency not installable: tcl8.4-dev"):
> Source: chiark-tcl
> Version: 1.1.2
> Severity: serious
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > sbuild-build-depends-chiark-tcl-dummy : Depends: tcl8.4-dev but i
Hi
On Saturday 17 January 2015, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Control: tags 774867 + patch
> Control: tags 774867 + pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for lirc (versioned as 0.9.0~pre1-1.2) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
This looks like the upstream bug:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54226
pgpeLoROPienY.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[ Just as reference, as this previous mail doesn't appear to have
reached bugs.d.o either ('thanks' to changes in my provider's
smarthost configuration) ]
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: [Pkg-lirc-maint] Bug#774867: lirc-x: unhandled symlink to
directory conversion:
Source: pymvpa
Version: 0.4.8-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150118 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build on i3
Source: pocl
Version: 0.10-10
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150118 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build on i386
Source: stressapptest
Version: 1.0.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150118 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to buil
Source: check-postgres
Version: 2.21.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150118 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to bu
Source: gdnsd
Version: 2.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build on
Source: openstack-trove
Version: 2014.1.3-4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed
Source: libarchive-zip-perl
Version: 1.39-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed
Source: horizon
Version: 2014.1.3-6
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Hi
On Saturday 17 January 2015, Török Edwin wrote:
[...]
DISCLAIMER: I can't speak for the Debian kernel maintainers.
[ Keep in mind that kernel >= 3.18 is not targetting jessie, but will
only enter unstable/ testing (==stretch) after jessie has been
released. ]
> Using linux-image-3.18.0
Source: neon27
Version: 0.30.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build on
Source: php-mdb2
Version: 2.5.0b5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Source: pry
Version: 0.10.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build on
Source: libdate-calc-perl
Version: 6.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to
Source: php-crypt-gpg
Version: 1.3.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to
Source: libdate-pcalc-perl
Version: 6.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to
Source: ruby-pygments.rb
Version: 0.5.4~ds1-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package
Source: chiark-tcl
Version: 1.1.2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Source: mysql-5.5
Version: 5.5.40-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Source: node-tap
Version: 0.4.13-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Source: php-structures-datagrid
Version: 0.9.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package
Source: symfony
Version: 2.3.21+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to
Source: procps
Version: 2:3.3.9-8
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Source: golang-go-xdg
Version: 0~bzr20140219-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package
Source: mail-notification
Version: 5.4.dfsg.1-12
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package
Source: beets
Version: 1.3.8+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Source: python-biopython
Version: 1.64+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package
Source: lua-rings
Version: 1.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Source: seaborn
Version: 0.4.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build on
Source: libdate-calc-xs-perl
Version: 6.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed
Source: kwave
Version: 0.8.11-1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Package: u-boot
Version: 2014.10+dfsg1-2
Severity: wishlist
When attempting to build u-boot using a cross-toolchain
(crossbuild-essential-armhf, gcc-4.9-arm-linux-gnueabihf, etc.) with
sbuild, the individual board targets appear to build fine, but it fails
on the tools-only target:
make[2]: Lea
Package: amanda-server
Version: 1:3.3.6-4
Followup-For: Bug #775612
This bug is rather strange as I have rerun using the exact commandline and now
the command succeeds with no
error message.
I have been getting these messages in some but not all of my emails from
amanda. There is something dis
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 01:03:36 +0100, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> On Saturday 17 January 2015, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > I've prepared an NMU for lirc (versioned as 0.9.0~pre1-1.2) and
> > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> > should delay it longer.
> First of all, I
Package: systemd
Version: 215-9
Severity: normal
type=AVC msg=audit(1421538903.417:232): avc: denied { use } for pid=23546
comm="kded4" path="/run/systemd/inhibit/1.ref" dev="tmpfs" ino=91124
scontext=rjc:user_r:user_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
tcontext=system_u:system_r:systemd_logind_t:s0 tclass=fd
On 17/01/15 21:38, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Chex 1/2 and Hacx should go into doom.yaml.
For at least Chex Quest, I disagree. My intention is that the division
into YAML files (and, one day, entries in a GUI) is not about whether
things happen to run on the same engine - that's an implementation
d
Package: amanda-server
Version: 1:3.3.6-4
Severity: serious
Justification: depends on software not in debian
Seen when attemping to do amrmtape, but also occurs when doing a flush:
an't locate Tie/StdHash.pm: Permission denied at /usr/share/perl/5.20/base.pm
line 97.
...propagated at /
Hi
[ Apologies if you receive this twice, my mail relay/ smarthost seems
to have problems and my previous/ identical response hasn't gotten
through yet. ]
On Saturday 17 January 2015, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Control: tags 774867 + patch
> Control: tags 774867 + pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 11:51:48 + Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Oct 2014 at 22:18:53 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I suspect this is essentially the same bug as #616689 and #678696,
> > except that now it may affect mounting /usr as well as /.
>
> I think this bug report is actually descr
For the record, here is the link to the documentation about this situation:
http://security-team.debian.org/security_tracker.html#packages-in-experimental-only
Cheers, luciano
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 11:51:48 + Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Oct 2014 at 22:18:53 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I suspect this is essentially the same bug as #616689 and #678696,
> > except that now it may affect mounting /usr as well as /.
>
> I think this bug report is actually descr
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 23:38:14 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> libGL.so.1 => /usr/lib/tls/libGL.so.1 (0xb7611000)
that's not something we ship.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: linux
Version: 3.16.7-ckt4-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi!
The kernel package currently fails to build from source on sh4 since
the build scripts try to pass the '-m32' compiler option on gcc which
is not available with gcc on sh4 (also according to the manpage).
Selecting HAVE_C_REC
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:20:50AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 12:48:33 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>
> > Package: libgl1-mesa-dri
> > Version: 10.3.2-1
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > After upgrading from wheezy to jessie, I
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 09:12:53PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Hello Jonathan Wiltshire.
>
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 04:31:54PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > Control: tags 775350 + patch
> > Control: tags 775350 + pending
> >
> > Dear maintainer,
> >
> > I've prepared an NMU for ut
chown() and write() should clear all privilege attributes on
a file - setuid, setgid, setcap and any other extended
privilege attributes.
However, any attributes beyond setuid and setgid are managed by the
LSM and not directly by the filesystem, so they cannot be set along
with the other attribute
Closes: #762984
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings
---
debian/control | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index fb2c918..928a8de 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Depends: klibc-utils (>= 2.0-1~), cpio, kmo
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings
---
initramfs-tools.8 | 7 +++
scripts/local | 2 ++
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/initramfs-tools.8 b/initramfs-tools.8
index 1d48e66..dbb430c 100644
--- a/initramfs-tools.8
+++ b/initramfs-tools.8
@@ -415,6 +415,13 @@ present (local) or the
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 05:22:52PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 04:16:56PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:28:51PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> Hi Mike,
> >>
> >> Have you seen this again recently? Is it still happening for you?
> >
> >As a ma
Thank you for the comprehensive report.
I cannot reproduce this bug on any of my systems running jessie or sid
(I cannot test on wheezy). But it has also been reported in the Ubuntu
version of this package:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/angband/+bug/1309711
I share your suspicion
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 12:48:33 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> Package: libgl1-mesa-dri
> Version: 10.3.2-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> After upgrading from wheezy to jessie, I found I was unable to use gdm3
> (with an unhelpful generic error message, but
Control: tag -1 patch
Here is a new script cribbed from the existing scripts/local-top/lvm2.
Tested in conjunction with the patch I'm about to send to #762984.
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/initramfs-tools/lvm2/scripts/local-extra/lvm2
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+PREREQ="mdadm mdrun multipath"
+
Package: policycoreutils
Version: 2.3-1
Severity: normal
# dmesg|grep tmpfiles.d
[ 48.978396] audit: type=1400 audit(1421535877.996:30): avc: denied { read
} for pid=746 comm="restorecond" name="tmpfiles.d" dev="dm-0" ino=207033
scontext=system_u:system_r:restorecond_t:s0
tcontext=unconfi
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 12:23:47PM +0100, Nicolas wrote:
>
>2015-01-06 12:14 GMT+01:00 Holger Levsen :
>
>> control: tags -1 moreinfo
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> thanks for your bug report. Do you know (or can find out) whether this also
>> happens on wheezy?
>
>I can patch but I'm afraid pLoader is more maint
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 22:57:07 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> I've prepared an NMU for lirc (versioned as 0.9.0~pre1-1.2) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
This looks very similar to the NMU I uploaded a few hours ago :)
Cheers,
grego
tags 737789 moreinfo
thanks
When I apt-get install angband 3.3.2-2.1, I see three icons appearing in
my gnome3 applications menu:
angband(GTK)
angband(X11)
angband(SDL)
All three have the same "Mr Att" icon (an @ symbol wearing a cap).
Please could you explain in more detail on which menu of
Control: tag -1 + patch pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for lirc (versioned as 0.9.0~pre1-1.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian Develop
Package: shutdown-at-night
Version: 0.14
Severity: important
Tags: patch
The gdm3 greeter seems to be a special gnome-session running as a user
with name '(unknown)'. shutdown-at-night uses 'who' to decide if users
are still active but doesn't recognize this very case.
The patch has been teste
reassign 775591 docker.io
thanks
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 10:43:23PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 docker
> Control: retitle -1 Docker should support overlayfs as alternative to aufs
>
> On Sat, 2015-01-17 at 21:45 +0200, Török Edwin wrote:
> > Package: src:linux
> > Version:
Control: reassign -1 docker
Control: retitle -1 Docker should support overlayfs as alternative to aufs
On Sat, 2015-01-17 at 21:45 +0200, Török Edwin wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 3.18-1~exp1
> Severity: normal
>
> --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
> Using linux-image-3.18
Package: libxine2-xvdr
Version: 1.1.0-1+b3
Severity: important
Hallo maintainers,
I prepare new version of software to my TV box based on jessie
packages using VDR and DVB-T card. Stable version of this box
runs well for years, so thank you for your work.
Trying jessie with VDR version 2.0 bri
retitle 775176 please manage address/port listenings with the conf.d snippets
system or something similar
stop
On Sat, 2015-01-17 at 13:51 +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> This bug report is about the files provided with the package. All
> I'm asking for is using a2enconf instead of ports.conf.
I'v
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jelmer Vernooij
* Package name: golang-codegangsta-cli
Version : 0.0
Upstream Author : Jeremy Saenz
* URL : https://github.com/codegangsta/cli
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Go
Description : small package for
Hi again,
I've found this site and followed the steps to try to debug the problem:
http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/Debugging/
This is the output of dmesg during shutdown:
[ 6792.054805] wlan0: deauthenticating from xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx by local
choice (Reason: 3=DEAUTH_LEAVING)
[ 6792.0
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 10/06/2014 05:23 PM, Michael Shuler wrote:
Do I understand this chain correctly to be the new root:
CN=USERTrust RSA Certification Authority
which is currently open for inclusion into Mozilla?
mozilla.org:
Status: ASSIGNED - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.
* Fabian Greffrath , 2015-01-17, 12:48:
Please consider making this faster.
BASE_MEMORY_EXTERN_MaxMemoryRequirement() returns 16MB, which is not
much these days, so perhaps you could just set:
So, you propose to comment out the entire while() loop and just set
BASE_MEMORY.MaxAllocate = BAS
* Fabian Greffrath , 2015-01-17, 12:41:
I rebuilt unace-nonfree with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt, and now the
binary segfaults all the time:
[...]
I couldn't get unace not to crash with your fuzzed archive when it was
built without optimization but with -fpie. Is this somehow related?
It's not un
1 - 100 of 297 matches
Mail list logo
