Bug#388970: teapop-mysql: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: teapop-mysql Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the s

Bug#388930: mediawiki1.5: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: mediawiki1.5 Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the s

Bug#388988: xtel: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: xtel Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short tim

Bug#388923: lire: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: lire Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short tim

Bug#388984: workman: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: workman Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short

Bug#388967: suphp-common: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: suphp-common Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the s

Bug#388949: phpwiki: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: phpwiki Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short

Bug#388919: libslp1: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: libslp1 Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short

Bug#388965: squidguard: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: squidguard Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the sho

Bug#388892: euro-support: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: euro-support Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the s

Bug#388978: user-es: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: user-es Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short

Bug#388968: teapop: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: teapop Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short t

Bug#388972: tetex-bin: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: tetex-bin Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the shor

Bug#388915: language-env: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: language-env Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the s

Bug#388927: mailcrypt: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: mailcrypt Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the shor

Bug#388964: spong-client: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: spong-client Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the s

Bug#388983: wipl-client-java: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: wipl-client-java Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in t

Bug#388951: ptex-jisfonts: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: ptex-jisfonts Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the

Bug#388935: mp3info: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: mp3info Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short

Bug#388924: logcheck: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: logcheck Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short

Bug#388989: xvmount: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: xvmount Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short

Bug#388937: mtop: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: mtop Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short tim

Bug#388922: libvpopmail-mysql: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: libvpopmail-mysql Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in

Bug#388987: xplanet: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: xplanet Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short

Bug#388926: logtool: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: logtool Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short

Bug#388936: msttcorefonts: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: msttcorefonts Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the

Bug#388909: ipppd: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: ipppd Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short ti

Bug#388942: nbd-client: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: nbd-client Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the sho

Bug#388958: shaper: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: shaper Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short t

Bug#388969: teapop-ldap: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: teapop-ldap Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the sh

Bug#388961: snort: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: snort Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short ti

Bug#388955: reiser4progs: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: reiser4progs Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the s

Bug#388971: teapop-pgsql: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: teapop-pgsql Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the s

Bug#388982: wflogs: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: wflogs Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short t

Bug#388890: ejabberd: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: ejabberd Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short

Bug#388917: libsctp1: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: libsctp1 Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short

Bug#388990: zhcon: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: zhcon Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short ti

Bug#388929: mcelog: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: mcelog Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short t

Bug#388981: webmin-ldap-user-simple: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: webmin-ldap-user-simple Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you packa

Bug#388959: slrn: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: slrn Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short tim

Bug#388975: trn4: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: trn4 Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short tim

Bug#388948: phpgacl: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: phpgacl Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short

Bug#388980: vtun: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: vtun Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short tim

Bug#388913: kbedic: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: kbedic Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short t

Bug#388928: masqmail: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: masqmail Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short

Bug#388885: dhcp3-client: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: dhcp3-client Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the s

Bug#388931: mediawiki1.7: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: mediawiki1.7 Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the s

Bug#388973: tex-common: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: tex-common Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the sho

Bug#388941: mysql-server-5.0: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: mysql-server-5.0 Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in t

Bug#388986: xapple2: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: xapple2 Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short

Bug#388954: radioclk: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: radioclk Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short

Bug#388932: mga-vid-common: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: mga-vid-common Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the

Bug#388933: mgetty-fax: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: mgetty-fax Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the sho

Bug#388977: tpctl: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: tpctl Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short ti

Bug#388901: gwhois: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: gwhois Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short t

Bug#388945: nut: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: nut Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short time

Bug#388912: karrigell: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: karrigell Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the shor

Bug#388960: slrnpull: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: slrnpull Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short

Bug#388976: twig: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: twig Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short tim

Bug#388914: lam-runtime: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: lam-runtime Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the sh

Bug#388903: harden-clients: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: harden-clients Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the

Bug#388921: libvpopmail-lmysql: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: libvpopmail-lmysql Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in

Bug#388974: tiger: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: tiger Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short ti

Bug#388946: openssh-server: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: openssh-server Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the

Bug#388962: snort-mysql: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: snort-mysql Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the sh

Bug#388899: gtk2-engines-spherecrystal: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: gtk2-engines-spherecrystal Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you pa

Bug#388943: nbd-server: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: nbd-server Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the sho

Bug#388883: ddclient: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: ddclient Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short

Bug#388910: isdnvboxserver: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: isdnvboxserver Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the

Bug#388991: xsmbrowser: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: xsmbrowser Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the sho

Bug#388957: rssh: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: rssh Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short tim

Bug#388908: interchange: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: interchange Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the sh

Bug#388897: f-prot-installer: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: f-prot-installer Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in t

Bug#388963: snort-pgsql: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: snort-pgsql Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the sh

Bug#388947: nvidia-cg-toolkit: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: nvidia-cg-toolkit Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in

Bug#388979: user-euro-es: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: user-euro-es Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the s

Bug#388950: powertweakd: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: powertweakd Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the sh

Bug#388966: ssh-krb5: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: ssh-krb5 Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short

Bug#388918: libsensors3: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: libsensors3 Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the sh

Bug#388985: wvdial: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: wvdial Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short t

Bug#388953: quake2-data: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: quake2-data Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the sh

Bug#388934: mozilla-browser: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: mozilla-browser Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in th

Bug#388889: efingerd: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: efingerd Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short

Bug#388916: leafnode: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: leafnode Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short

Bug#388952: qmail-src: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: qmail-src Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the shor

Bug#388938: mueller7-dict: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: mueller7-dict Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the

Bug#388940: muttprint: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: muttprint Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the shor

Bug#388911: john: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: john Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short tim

Bug#388900: gtktrain: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: gtktrain Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short

Bug#388944: netenv: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: netenv Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short t

Bug#388956: resolvconf: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: resolvconf Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the sho

Bug#388896: gidentd: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: gidentd Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short

Bug#388907: hylafax-server: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: hylafax-server Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the

Bug#388939: mush-src: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: mush-src Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short

Bug#388888: dump: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: dump Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short tim

Bug#388925: logcheck-database: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: logcheck-database Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in

Bug#388882: dbishell: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: dbishell Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short

Bug#388894: filterproxy: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: filterproxy Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the sh

Bug#388905: hwtools: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: hwtools Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package in the short

Bug#388920: libvpopmail-freecdb: [annoying_notes] Abuse of debconf note(s)

Package: libvpopmail-freecdb Version: N/A Severity: normal Hello, As announced in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00630.html, this bug report is part of a mass bug filing campaign about the "abuse" of debconf templates of type "note". First of all, in case you fixed you package i

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >