Bug#317408: marked as done (ITA: libdbd-anydata-perl -- perl DBI driver for files and data structures)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 20:47:17 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#317408: fixed in libdbd-anydata-perl 0.08-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#354455: marked as done (dosemu: displays error "cannot touch")

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 20:32:18 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#354455: fixed in dosemu 1.2.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#354372: marked as done (dosemu: filename unicode translation)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 20:32:18 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#354372: fixed in dosemu 1.2.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#354270: marked as done (dosemu: stack_size obsolete patch)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 20:32:18 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#354270: fixed in dosemu 1.2.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#354227: marked as done (dosemu: add debian/watch)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 20:32:18 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#354227: fixed in dosemu 1.2.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#354208: marked as done (dosemu: too fast to play games)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 20:32:18 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#354208: fixed in dosemu 1.2.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#352572: marked as done (debianize message about missing dosemu-freedos)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 20:32:18 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#352572: fixed in dosemu 1.2.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#355372: marked as done (fish crashes on invalid string substitution in a pipe)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 19:47:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#355372: fixed in fish 1.21.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#350593: marked as done (quodlibet: clicking on table cells doesn't work when content doesn't fit)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 18:23:29 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#350593: fixed in quodlibet 0.18-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#353505: marked as done (ITP: mutagen -- audio tag editing library and tools)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 18:19:55 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#353505: fixed in mutagen 0.9-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#349157: marked as done (quodlibet: quodlibet froze very often)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 18:23:29 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#349157: fixed in quodlibet 0.18-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#306882: marked as done (Please, separate Ex Falso if it's possible)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 18:23:29 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#306882: fixed in quodlibet 0.18-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#254089: marked as done (FTBFS: test for res_mkquery is broken)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 18:32:15 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#254089: fixed in mtr 0.69-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#166613: marked as done (mtr_0.51-1 (unstable): fails to build)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 18:32:15 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#254089: fixed in mtr 0.69-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#354704: marked as done (gpe-contacts - FTBFS: Missing build dependency: cdbs)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 04:31:55 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#354704: gpe-contacts - FTBFS: Missing build dependency: cdbs has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#355455: marked as done (trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libpano12.la', which is also in package libpano12)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 6 Mar 2006 02:04:26 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#355455: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libpano12.la', which is also in package libpano12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#355029: marked as done (glibc: [INTL:it] Italian debconf templates translation)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 6 Mar 2006 01:23:10 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#355029: glibc: [INTL:it] Italian debconf templates translation has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#228486: marked as done (coreutils: Strange output of /bin/mv)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 6 Mar 2006 01:11:49 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#228486: Should this bug be closed? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#228486: marked as done (coreutils: Strange output of /bin/mv)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 6 Mar 2006 01:10:55 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#228486: Should this bug be closed? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#355469: marked as done (please update hddtemp.db)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 15:47:15 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#355469: fixed in hddtemp 0.3-beta14-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#355476: marked as done (New upstream version 2.4.0)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 6 Mar 2006 00:22:10 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#355476: New upstream version 2.4.0 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#312453: marked as done (typo - incorrect description)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 15:02:05 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#312453: fixed in gnome-blog 0.9-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#343516: marked as done (selfhtml: new version 8.1.1 available)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 15:17:20 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343516: fixed in selfhtml 8.1.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#354735: marked as done (flashplugin-nonfree: please ship symlinks with the package)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 14:32:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#354735: fixed in flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.61-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#342317: marked as done (flashplugin-nonfree: firefox changing package name and plugin location)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 14:32:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342317: fixed in flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.61-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#344507: marked as done (flashplugin-nonfree: downgrading is confusing)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 14:32:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#344507: fixed in flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.61-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#305568: marked as done (Wrong archive filename in postinst; right filename in debconf template)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 14:32:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341238: fixed in flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.61-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#341238: marked as done (flashplugin-nonfree: Installer cannot install manually downloaded file)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 14:32:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341238: fixed in flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.61-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#321194: marked as done (flashplugin-nonfree: download broken)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 14:32:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340690: fixed in flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.61-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#340690: marked as done (flashplugin-nonfree fails to download flashplayer from download sites)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 14:32:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340690: fixed in flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.61-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#350970: marked as done (flashplugin-nonfree: gsfonts-x11 in "Depends:")

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 14:32:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340206: fixed in flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.61-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#340206: marked as done (flashplugin-nonfree: gsfonts-x11 in "Depends:")

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 14:32:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340206: fixed in flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.61-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#336113: marked as done (flashplugin-nonfree: Installer should use the system proxy settings)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 14:32:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#336113: fixed in flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.61-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#331822: marked as done (flashplugin-nonfree depends on debconf without | debconf-2.0 alternate; blocks cdebconf transition)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 14:32:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#331822: fixed in flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.61-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#330390: marked as done (flashplugin-nonfree: [INTL:sv] Swedish debconf templates translation)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 14:32:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#330390: fixed in flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.61-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#325629: marked as done ([INTL:it] initial italian debconf translation)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 14:32:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325629: fixed in flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.61-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#319374: marked as done ([l10n] Initial Czech translation of flashplugin-nonfree debconf messages)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 14:32:05 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#319374: fixed in flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.61-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#304072: marked as done (flashplugin-nonfree: [INTL:pt_BR] Please consider adding the attached debconf template translation)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 14:32:05 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#304072: fixed in flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.61-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#255947: marked as done (/usr/sbin/update-flashplugin: --proxy option does not work)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 14:32:05 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#255947: fixed in flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.61-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#155967: marked as done (flashplugin: flashplugin depends on ruby for installation)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 14:32:05 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#155967: fixed in flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.61-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#239355: marked as done (flashplugin-nonfree: does not handle proxies or non-networked systems well)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 14:32:05 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#239355: fixed in flashplugin-nonfree 7.0.61-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#348411: marked as done (kdesvn: dcop error when opening context menu in konqueror)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 14:17:12 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#348411: fixed in kdesvn 0.7.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#355397: marked as done (cron-apt: probably typo in DIFFIGNORE example)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 13:47:20 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#355397: fixed in cron-apt 0.4.4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#350376: marked as done (acidbase: Please consider using dbconfig-common for database configuration and/or prompting)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 13:47:12 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#350376: fixed in acidbase 1.2.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#355317: marked as done (FTBFS: out of date build-depdenecy; move to automake1.7)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 13:47:56 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#355317: fixed in mailsync 5.2.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#355235: marked as done (initramfs-tools: file name illegal in variable names)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 13:47:49 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#355235: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.53b has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#352246: marked as done (acidbase: signature names are numeric (patch))

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 13:47:12 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#352246: fixed in acidbase 1.2.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#349216: marked as done (phpgacl: Your debconf templates do not follow the developers reference)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 13:48:00 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#349216: fixed in phpgacl 3.3.6-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#349032: marked as done (Drop cdda modules from default-modules)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 22:56:15 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in NMU of gnome-vfs2 2.12.2-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#344052: marked as done (acidbase: Your debconf templates do not follow the developers reference)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 13:47:12 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#344052: fixed in acidbase 1.2.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#336913: marked as done (gtick: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 13:47:40 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#336913: fixed in gtick 0.3.7-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#266485: marked as done (ITA: clig -- Command Line Interpreter Generator)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 13:47:19 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#266485: fixed in clig 1.9.11.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#337324: marked as done (fai: debootstrap 0.3.2+ doesn't work with FAI)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 5 Mar 2006 22:18:31 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line (no subject) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reop

Bug#348849: marked as done (fai: loopback device not up)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 5 Mar 2006 22:14:02 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line bug already closes has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t

Bug#327387: marked as done (dpkg-split segfault)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 5 Mar 2006 22:45:55 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327387: dpkg-split segfault has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Bug#355353: marked as done (most: Glitch in tab expansion)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 11:47:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#355353: fixed in most 4.10.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#340283: marked as done ([CVE-2005-1790] DoS against Mozilla-based browsers)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 5 Mar 2006 15:10:19 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#340283: [CVE-2005-1790] DoS against Mozilla-based browsers has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#325595: marked as done (dvbstream: -t command line option fails)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 11:47:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#325595: fixed in dvbstream 0.5-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#309617: marked as done (yaret: no_normalization of the last track hangs forever)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 11:47:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#309617: fixed in yaret 2.1.0-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: close 336076

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 336076 Bug#336076: CVS build problem due to missing file 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to James Henstridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > thanks Stopping processing here

Bug#354552: marked as done (flex - FTBFS: /build/buildd/flex-2.5.33/missing: line 46: flex: command not found)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 11:32:10 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#354552: fixed in flex 2.5.33-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#352180: marked as done (i10n support for firefox 1.5)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 5 Mar 2006 14:28:03 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#352180: i10n support for firefox 1.5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#349439: marked as done (pente - FTBFS: error: syntax error before 'Pixmap')

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 5 Mar 2006 19:20:34 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing 349439/347036 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit

Bug#347036: marked as done (pente: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 5 Mar 2006 19:20:34 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Closing 349439/347036 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit

Bug#339145: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 11:17:12 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339145: fixed in alps-light1 1.2.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Processed: Re: Bug#330966: mozilla-firefox: Undefined value in patch "Ignore unused mouse buttons"

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 330966 firefox Bug#330966: mozilla-firefox: Undefined value in patch "Ignore unused mouse buttons" Bug reassigned from package `mozilla-firefox' to `firefox'. > close 330966 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.1-3 Bug#330966: mozilla-firefox: Undefined value in p

Bug#354947: marked as done (gtk+2.0-directfb: FTBFS (ppc64): Please support the ppc64 architecture)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 10:47:12 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#354947: fixed in gtk+2.0-directfb 2.0.9.2-14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#350197: marked as done (Please add 'armeb' to architecture)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 10:47:12 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#350197: fixed in gtk+2.0-directfb 2.0.9.2-14 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#341134: marked as done (sylpheed-claws-gtk2-vcalendar-plugin: Wrong version)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 09:32:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341134: fixed in sylpheed-claws-gtk2-vcalendar-plugin 1.29-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#354441: marked as done (does not purge cached configuration files in /var/lib/ucf/cache)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 09:17:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#354442: fixed in ucf 2.006 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Bug#354442: marked as done (tetex-base: purge incomplete)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 09:17:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#354442: fixed in ucf 2.006 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Bug#354442: marked as done (tetex-base: purge incomplete)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 09:17:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#354441: fixed in ucf 2.006 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Bug#354441: marked as done (does not purge cached configuration files in /var/lib/ucf/cache)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 09:17:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#354441: fixed in ucf 2.006 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your res

Bug#347586: marked as done (mysql-server-4.1: unacceptable transitional package)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 18:04:35 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line package still broken has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit

Bug#349846: marked as done (mysql-server-5.0: Please let 5.0.18 migrate to testing)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 18:16:41 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line 5.0.18 is in testing now has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Bug#348945: marked as done (sylpheed-claws-gtk2-etpan-privacy: conflict with current version of sylpheed-claws-gtk2)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 09:02:11 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#348945: fixed in sylpheed-claws-gtk2-etpan-privacy 0.13-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#355100: marked as done (kernel-package - rebuilds image)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 10:59:09 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#355100: kernel-package - rebuilds image has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#355426: marked as done (mono-classlib-2.0's corlib out of sync with runtime)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 17:34:08 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [Pkg-mono-group] Bug#355426: mono-classlib-2.0's corlib out of sync with runtime has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#354036: marked as done (sylpheed: Does no longer actually build-depend on libgdk-pixbuf-dev)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 08:32:04 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#354036: fixed in sylpheed 2.2.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#331209: marked as done (Fails to build when /bin/sh is dash)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 08:32:04 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#331209: fixed in sylpheed 2.2.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#337859: marked as done (python-mode: Can't be installed with emacs-snapshot-nox)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 07:32:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#337859: fixed in python-mode 1:1.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#331285: marked as done (When I remove emacs21, it removes python-mode (I have emacs-snapshot).)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 07:32:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#331285: fixed in python-mode 1:1.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#316622: marked as done (use python-mode for SConstruct files by default)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 07:32:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#316622: fixed in python-mode 1:1.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#296104: marked as done (python-mode: Installation fails on systems with emacs20 installed.)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 07:32:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#296104: fixed in python-mode 1:1.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#355393: marked as done (should be "arch: all")

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 06:32:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#355393: fixed in libcarp-clan-perl 5.3-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#355328: marked as done (otrs: symlink renders backup.pl useless in some cases)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 06:47:30 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#355328: fixed in otrs 2.0.4p01-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#316340: marked as done (otrs: check for existence of programs in cron scripts)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 06:47:30 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#316340: fixed in otrs 2.0.4p01-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#355079: marked as done (Please update your config.* files)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 06:32:09 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#355079: fixed in spellutils 0.7-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#310854: marked as done (otrs: minor spelling fixes)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 06:47:30 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#310854: fixed in otrs 2.0.4p01-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#343363: marked as done (package linux-image-2.6.14-2-686 won't install due to a post-installation script error.)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 08:09:34 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343363: kernel-package: 2.6.15 + broken mkinitrd-tools = unbootable system ? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#355332: marked as done (make-kpkg: don't fail if rootcmd isn't specified)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 08:06:12 -0600 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#355332: make-kpkg: don't fail if rootcmd isn't specified has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#317290: marked as done (Missing dependency on python-soappy)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 06:02:06 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#317290: fixed in twisted-web 0.5.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#353985: marked as done (gcfilms: New upstream version 6.1)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 05:47:17 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#353985: fixed in gcfilms 6.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#350311: marked as done (ldm: Fix xauth handling to speed up the login by 20 seconds)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 05:47:19 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#350311: fixed in ltsp 0.82debian1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#348800: marked as done (diff for 1.5.0-1.1 NMU)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 05:47:22 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#348800: fixed in python-numarray 1.5.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#346530: marked as done (ltsp-client: Fail with /bin/sh -> dash)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 05:47:19 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#346530: fixed in ltsp 0.82debian1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#345130: marked as done (ltsp-server: client kernel fails to install)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 05:47:19 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#345130: fixed in ltsp 0.82debian1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#343329: marked as done (segmentation fault on dot)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 05:47:22 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#343329: fixed in python-numarray 1.5.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#342875: marked as done (python-visual - FTBFS: error: expected type-specifier before ';' token)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 05:47:22 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342875: fixed in python-numarray 1.5.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#335852: marked as done (ltsp-server: Unable to boot sid client with 2.6 kernel)

2006-03-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Mar 2006 05:47:19 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#335852: fixed in ltsp 0.82debian1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

  1   2   >