Bug#328566: marked as done (gtkdiskfree: insecure temporary file creation)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 22:12:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line gtkdiskfree: insecure temporary file creation has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#332987: marked as done (gnomebaker: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 22:02:05 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#332987: fixed in gnomebaker 0.5.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#334023: marked as done (perl: possible LKM Trojan infection)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:58:28 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334023: perl: possible LKM Trojan infection has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#332973: marked as done (mercurial: Add hgweb.cgi and hgwebdir.cgi in examples)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 21:02:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#332973: fixed in mercurial 0.7-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#331696: marked as done (FTBFS when upx-ucl-beta is installed)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 19:47:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#331696: fixed in dar 2.2.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#307884: marked as done (Two bugs in Speex 1.1.6, set to ship with Sarge)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 19:32:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#307884: fixed in speex 1.1.10-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#306159: marked as done (speexdec: relocation error: speexdec: undefined symbol: speex_decode_int)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 19:32:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#306159: fixed in speex 1.1.10-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#300968: marked as done (New upstream version available)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 19:32:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#300968: fixed in speex 1.1.10-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#334033: marked as done (kbear_2.1.1-11(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: gcc-4.0 workaround needed)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 19:02:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334033: fixed in kbear 2.1.1-12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#334163: marked as done (mftrace: Please package version 1.1.17 of mftrace)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 18:32:53 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334163: fixed in mftrace 1.1.17-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#333128: marked as done (aptitude: Incorrect po template in the latest darcs version)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:16:31 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in 0.3.5.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#332891: marked as done (/etc/cron.daily/aptitude is buggy !)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:16:31 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in 0.3.5.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#332345: marked as done (Segmentation fault during downloading packages)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:16:31 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in 0.3.5.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#331199: marked as done (Wrong character encoding in parts retrived from apt)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:16:31 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in 0.3.5.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#333918: marked as done (aptitude: [INTL:sv] Swedish translation of help.txt)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:16:31 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in 0.3.5.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#333872: marked as done ('reinstall' is in 'man aptitude' but not in 'aptitude -h')

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:16:31 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in 0.3.5.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#332883: marked as done (aptitude: please give option to allow installation of untrusted packages)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:16:31 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in 0.3.5.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#332708: marked as done (aptitude: reads package lists etc. twice)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:16:31 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in 0.3.5.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#331408: marked as done (wrong path for debtags information)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:16:31 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in 0.3.5.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#332179: marked as done (bug in search box)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:16:31 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in 0.3.5.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#331400: marked as done (aptitude segfaults during dist-upgrade)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:16:31 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in 0.3.5.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#331404: marked as done (aptitude: "Exactly one filter must be provided as an argument to a filter policy" on startup)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:16:31 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in 0.3.5.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#331245: marked as done (aptitude: crashes viewing mutt changelog)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:16:31 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in 0.3.5.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#217477: marked as done (aptitude: Add quiet (-q) option)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:16:31 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in 0.3.5.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility

Bug#333971: marked as done (vdk2: Please rebuild for C++ 'c2' transition)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 16:43:54 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#333971: fixed in vdk2 2.4.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#333137: marked as done (missing info file for gpc (GNU PASCAL))

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
t kit) Closes: 322624 326875 329893 331216 333137 Changes: gcc-3.4 (3.4.4-9) unstable; urgency=low . * Updated to gcc-3.4 CVS 20051015. * Update hurd-changes.dpatch (Michael Banck). Closes: #322624. * Add support for the ppc64 architecture (Andreas Jochens). Closes: #326875. * Fix

Bug#329893: marked as done (gcc-3.4: M32R libffi update for 3.4.4)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
tion for the GNU Fortran compiler (g77) gcc-3.4- The GNU C compiler gcc-3.4-base - The GNU Compiler Collection (base package) gcc-3.4-doc - Documentation for the GNU compilers (gcc, gobjc, g++) gnat-3.4 - The GNU Ada compiler gnat-3.4-doc - Documentation for the GNU Ada compiler (gnat)

Bug#333949: marked as done (ITP: orpheus -- text mode menu- and window-driven audio player application)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 16:39:34 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#333949: fixed in orpheus 1.5-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#331216: marked as done (gcc-3.4: Please add big-endian arm (armeb) support)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
64bit) libg2c0- Runtime library for GNU Fortran 77 applications libg2c0-dev - GNU Fortran 77 library development libgnat-3.4 - Runtime library for GNU Ada applications libstdc++6-dbg - The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (debugging files) libstdc++6-dev - The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (development

Bug#326875: marked as done (gcc-3.4: FTBFS (ppc64): Please support the ppc64 architecture)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
piler gpc-2.1-3.4 - The GNU Pascal compiler gpc-2.1-3.4-doc - Documentation for the GNU Pascal compiler (gpc) lib64g2c0 - Runtime library for GNU Fortran 77 applications (64bit) libg2c0- Runtime library for GNU Fortran 77 applications libg2c0-dev - GNU Fortran 77 library developm

Bug#322624: marked as done (gcc-3.4: FTFBS on hurd-i386: Patch for sysheaders in /usr/include needs update)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
libstdc++6-pic - The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (shared library subset kit) Closes: 322624 326875 329893 331216 333137 Changes: gcc-3.4 (3.4.4-9) unstable; urgency=low . * Updated to gcc-3.4 CVS 20051015. * Update hurd-changes.dpatch (Michael Banck). Closes: #322624. * Add support for t

Bug#294437: marked as done (vdk2: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): 'data' was not declared in this scope)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 16:43:54 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#294437: fixed in vdk2 2.4.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#272295: marked as done (liblucene-java: move to main)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 16:42:26 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#272295: fixed in lucene 1.4.3-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#262091: marked as done (vdk2: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: there are no arguments to `size' that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of `size' must be available)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 16:43:54 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#262091: fixed in vdk2 2.4.0-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#333152: marked as done (ITP: ruby-v4l -- An extension library for capture pictures in Ruby using Video4Linux.)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 16:05:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#333152: fixed in ruby-v4l 0.1.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#333230: marked as done (ITP: bsdtar -- tar(1) from FreeBSD, with read support for tar/zip/ISO9660/cpio using libarchive)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 15:41:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#333230: fixed in bsdtar 1.02.034-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#333222: marked as done (ITP: libarchive -- Single libary to read/write tar, cpio, pax, zip, etc. files)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 15:38:54 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#333222: fixed in libarchive 1.02.034-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#331636: marked as done (ITP: scorereadingtrainer -- Trainer for reading music notes)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 15:27:25 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#331636: fixed in score-reading-trainer 0.1.3-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#332961: marked as done (nvram-wakeup: Please add amd64 to Architecture:)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 15:17:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#332961: fixed in nvram-wakeup 0.97-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#332354: marked as done (nvram-wakeup: [INTL:sv] Swedish debconf templates translation)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 15:17:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#332354: fixed in nvram-wakeup 0.97-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#318191: marked as done (nvram-wakeup starts 5 minutes early)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 15:17:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#318191: fixed in nvram-wakeup 0.97-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#332641: marked as done (ITP: gspot - gnome search applet)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 15:06:15 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#332641: fixed in gspot 0.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#317047: marked as done ([Fwd: Log for successful build of gnome-python-extras_2.10.0-4 (dist=unstable)])

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:59:03 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#317047: fixed in gnome-python-extras 2.10.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#327297: marked as done (gramps 2.0.8-1 segfaults on startup on AMD64)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:59:03 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327420: fixed in gnome-python-extras 2.10.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#332623: marked as done (ITP: aylet -- player for Spectrum '.ay' music files)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:56:24 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#332623: fixed in aylet 0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#327420: marked as done (python2.3-gnome2-extras: gtkspell causes Segfault on import on AMD64)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:59:03 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327420: fixed in gnome-python-extras 2.10.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#323499: marked as done (gaim: crashes with bad/old yahoo password)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:47:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#323499: fixed in gaim 1:1.5.0+1.5.1cvs20051015-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#267180: marked as done (gaim: aim file transfers don't work)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:47:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#267180: fixed in gaim 1:1.5.0+1.5.1cvs20051015-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Bug#331157: marked as done (libapt-front: FTBFS: Missing build dependency on wget)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 23:41:39 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line fixed in 0.3.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to r

Bug#328659: marked as done (mondo: option nolock missing in mount -t nfs commands)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:32:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328659: fixed in mondo 2.04-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#328640: marked as done (mondo: start-nfs fails to mount nfs share)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:32:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328640: fixed in mondo 2.04-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#324808: marked as done (scim-chinese: sicm-chinese uninstallable with scim 1.4.1)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:30:34 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#324808: fixed in scim-pinyin 0.5.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#330010: marked as done (ITP: libjson-perl -- parse and convert to JSON (JavaScript Object Notation))

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:31:51 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#330010: fixed in libjson-perl 1.00-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#323809: marked as done (keynote man page are not installed)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:32:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#323809: fixed in keynote 2.3-11 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#331618: marked as done (scim-chinese still not installable)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:30:34 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#324268: fixed in scim-pinyin 0.5.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#324268: marked as done (Uninstallable scim-chinese package)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:30:34 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#324268: fixed in scim-pinyin 0.5.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#297975: marked as done (scim-chinese: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'void*' to 'int' loses precision)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:30:34 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#297975: fixed in scim-pinyin 0.5.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#329246: marked as done (mondoarchive failing when booting in compare mode)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:17:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#329246: fixed in mindi 1.04-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#332025: marked as done (mindi-partimagehack depends on debconf without | debconf-2.0 alternate; blocks cdebconf transition)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:17:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#332025: fixed in mindi-partimagehack 0.6.2-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#324302: marked as done (mindi image broken with libc6 > 2.3.4)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:17:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#324302: fixed in mindi 1.04-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Close bug

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 315451 Bug#315451: laptop-mode-tools: ext3,ext2 not recognized as ext3 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Dan Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > thanks Stopping pro

Bug#331430: marked as done (bar-cursor.el: Loading the library changes cursor to hollow box in emacs-snapshot)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:32:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#331430: fixed in emacs-goodies-el 25.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#331421: marked as done (shell-command.el: activation is documented wrongly)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:32:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#331421: fixed in emacs-goodies-el 25.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#331234: marked as done (gnus-filter-history: *Filter History* is read only)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:32:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#331234: fixed in emacs-goodies-el 25.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#331114: marked as done (debian-el: leaves temporary files in /tmp after installation)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:32:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#331114: fixed in emacs-goodies-el 25.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#329883: marked as done (emacs-goodies-el: Key binding for wdired not defined in emacs-snapshot)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:32:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#329883: fixed in emacs-goodies-el 25.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#326772: marked as done ([EMAIL PROTECTED]: CWEB Emacs mode])

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:32:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#326772: fixed in emacs-goodies-el 25.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#317566: marked as done ([New file] minibuf-electric.el)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:32:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#317566: fixed in emacs-goodies-el 25.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#309790: marked as done (dpkg: [Emacs] compiling *.el files shoudl display errors, not just log file name)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:32:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#309790: fixed in emacs-goodies-el 25.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#301293: marked as done (dict.el: `current-word' can return nil)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:32:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#301293: fixed in emacs-goodies-el 25.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#293732: marked as done (emacs-goodies-el: Please add support for ido.el)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:32:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#293732: fixed in emacs-goodies-el 25.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#297828: marked as done (emacs-goodies-el: Please include slang-mode)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:32:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#297828: fixed in emacs-goodies-el 25.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#280415: marked as done (Emacs-mode for cfengine-files.)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:32:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#280415: fixed in emacs-goodies-el 25.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#260705: marked as done (emacs-goodies-el: Add csv-mode.el)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:32:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#260705: fixed in emacs-goodies-el 25.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#246379: marked as done (emacs-goodies-el: suggestion to include an two extra el files for Matlab (TM))

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:32:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#246379: fixed in emacs-goodies-el 25.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#237341: marked as done (Please include CUA and tabbar)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:32:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#237341: fixed in emacs-goodies-el 25.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Bug#327797: marked as done (bins: contains paths from the build process)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 20:52:03 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327797: bins: contains paths from the build process has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#334118: marked as done (HPPA B180L 2005-10-15 netboot install successful)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 15:34:45 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334118: HPPA B180L 2005-10-15 netboot install successful has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#271799: marked as done (ITA: fbpager -- a pager application for the Fluxbox window manager)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 11:32:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#271799: fixed in fbpager 0.1.4-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#334043: marked as done (rss2email: manpage still lists "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" as default from)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 11:17:08 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#334043: fixed in rss2email 1:2.55-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#332312: marked as done (gnucash: Corrupt Toolbar icons in latest release)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 11:02:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#332312: fixed in gnome-libs 1.4.2-25 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#333727: marked as done (FTBFS: Missing build-deps, -lm)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 18:27:18 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in upload of libgnomeprint 2.12.1-2 to experimental has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#316889: marked as done ([l10n] Initial Czech translation of libpam-radius-auth debconf messages)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:32:05 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#316889: fixed in libpam-radius-auth 1.3.16-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#332003: marked as done (libpam-radius-auth depends on debconf without | debconf-2.0 alternate; blocks cdebconf transition)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:32:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#332003: fixed in libpam-radius-auth 1.3.16-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#333145: marked as done (libpam-radius-auth: [INTL:sv] Swedish debconf templates translation)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:32:06 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#333145: fixed in libpam-radius-auth 1.3.16-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#312442: marked as done (INTL:vi)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:32:05 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#312442: fixed in libpam-radius-auth 1.3.16-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#320427: marked as done (bugzilla: dpkg failed to upgrade to 2.18-7 with already installed DB)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 18:58:50 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line bug closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reope

Bug#311555: marked as done (wine: Missing build depend for docbook)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 12:30:17 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#311555: wine: Missing build depend for docbook has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#312323: marked as done (cannot install: unable to find /usr/share/bugzilla/debian/params.new)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 18:58:50 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line bug closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reope

Bug#309649: marked as done (bugzilla: debconf script misses manually-changed db_user)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 18:58:50 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line bug closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reope

Bug#309912: marked as done (bugzilla: failure creating a db with hyphens in name (#303730 redux))

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 18:58:50 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line bug closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reope

Bug#172941: marked as done (bugzilla-doc: missing images directory)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 18:58:50 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line bug closed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reope

Bug#295137: marked as done (wine: icons toolbar missing)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 12:18:05 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#295137: wine: icons toolbar missing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#226201: marked as done (redundant Build-Depends-Indep)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 12:34:37 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#226201: missing Build-Depends? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: closing 241744

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 > close 241744 0.50-2-4 Bug#241744: aspell-pt is not instalable 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 0.50-2-4, send any

Bug#264637: marked as done (www.debian.org: consultants page out of date)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:55:51 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Backlog has been processed and most of the consultants have been pinged has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#331275: marked as done (gif2png: use of internal library functions let it FTBFS)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 08:47:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#331275: fixed in gif2png 2.5.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#328336: marked as done (gif2png: please rebuild against latest libpng)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 08:47:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#328336: fixed in gif2png 2.5.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#285329: marked as done (web2png does nothing)

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 08:47:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#285329: fixed in gif2png 2.5.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now yo

Bug#332694: marked as done (zope-testcase: Uploader "Andrea Menucci" -> "Andrea Mennucci")

2005-10-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Oct 2005 08:17:11 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#332694: fixed in zope-testcase 0.9.8-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

  1   2   >