On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:33:04PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> What does that do exactly? Send a report to mozilla?
> Will they actually put pressure on websites to fix this?
They have an evangelist team supposed to do that, yes.
Now, reading [1] it is not clear whether they use stuff from the b
* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 03:48:32AM -0400, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > * Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 03:25:08AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > > > * Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > > > E
Give your career a makeover with a new degree
Want a better job? We can help you in under 20 days
Call 24/7 on
For US: 1-419-735-9250
Outside US: +1-419-735-9250
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: installation-reports
I try to install Debian on a RAID 0, using the "install dmraid=true" command.
Boot method: iso DVD
Image version: Lenny for amd64, downloaded in April 2008
Date: 26/06/08
Machine: MoBo Asus M2N sli Deluxe, 2 Maxtor HDD
Processor:AMD athlon x2 3.2Ghz
Memory:2 Gb
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 09:09:06PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Bug reassigned from package `partman-crypto' to `grub'.
Ignore that; I picked the wrong number.
--
Robert Millan
I know my rights; I want my phone call!
What good is a phone call… if you are unable to speak?
(as se
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 486360 partman-crypto
Bug#486360: debian-installer: loop-aes root fs encryption unusable due to
incomplete initrd
Bug reassigned from package `grub' to `partman-crypto'.
> tags 486360 - pending
Bug#486360: debian-installer: loop-aes root fs e
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> reassign 486360 grub
Bug#486360: debian-installer: loop-aes root fs encryption unusable due to
incomplete initrd
Bug reassigned from package `partman-crypto' to `grub'.
>
End of mes
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:24:59PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Now, for something relevant, do you really want me to get started with
> crash reports ?
It seems I should have read the bug backlog...
Le mardi 03 juin 2008 à 12:04 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit :
> > Cool, are you finally willing t
I'm not suprised that these sites are known. My point is that our users
devote a significant amount of traffic (I generally only picked on
message from each thread) to figuring out how to work around them.
Mike Hommey wrote:
> even bother? And again, how is this even relevant as to whether
> icewe
Your message dated Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464966: fixed in discover-data 2.2008.06.25
has caused the Debian Bug report #464966,
regarding 915resolution is obsolete
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Accepted:
discover-data_2.2008.06.25.dsc
to pool/main/d/discover-data/discover-data_2.2008.06.25.dsc
discover-data_2.2008.06.25.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/discover-data/discover-data_2.2008.06.25.tar.gz
discover-data_2.2008.06.25_all.deb
to pool/main/d/discover-data/discover-data_2.2008.06.25_all
discover-data_2.2008.06.25_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
discover-data_2.2008.06.25.dsc
discover-data_2.2008.06.25.tar.gz
discover-data_2.2008.06.25_all.deb
discover1-data_2.2008.06.25_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNS
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:39:32AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Mike Hommey wrote:
> > The fact is users don't *always* have to set this, because far from all
> > websites require it. If so many users were impacted, we would be drowned
> > under piles of bug reports about this issue, yet, there is onl
(Please keep debian-boot@ in Cc:)
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 09:49:38PM +0200, Arian Sanusi wrote:
> Jérémy Bobbio schrieb:
> >On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 04:39:49PM +0200, Arian Sanusi wrote:
> >
> >>I installed debian testing (network installation image downloaded in
> >>June 22) and had afterwards
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 06:18:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> ide-generic did hurt a lot, it took over the ide device in various case
> over the native driver, and disk support broke.
Which cases? lack of ide-generic hurts a lot when it is the only driver
for your controller too.
> Also, this i
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 06:49:32PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> this thread goes no where.
>
> loading a module on *all* boxes for 0.01% percent of the population
> is not the right thing to do.
And what solution is there for the 0.01% that would like to continue
using their systems? Do you
Your message dated Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:22:07 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: discover-data vesa driver for intel
has caused the Debian Bug report #458462,
regarding discover-data vesa driver for intel
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
clone 486360 -1
reassign -1 grub-common 1.96+20080512-1
severity -1 important
tags -1 d-i
thanks
While reproducing this issue a problem was found with grub being set up
with root=/dev/loop0 instead of the underlying block device. A fix in
grub-common for this has been discussed on IRC between th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 486360 -1
Bug#486360: debian-installer: loop-aes root fs encryption unusable due to
incomplete initrd
Bug 486360 cloned as bug 488016.
> reassign -1 grub-common 1.96+20080512-1
Bug#488016: debian-installer: loop-aes root fs encryption unusable d
this thread goes no where.
loading a module on *all* boxes for 0.01% percent of the population
is not the right thing to do.
if you want some more informed statement read what fjp wrote down
or come up with a fine patch.
--
mask
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 05:21:34PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> that there is *zero* point in having it loaded first.
>
> also win 95 killed ISA thankfully. gone dead.
> if someone really complains we can start wasting time there.
Win95 ran just fine on an ISA only 486. Not dead what so eve
Al intentar descargar la version de debia genera el error 404 el cual
es por el link de descarga
http://people.debian.org/~aba/d-i/images/daily/netboot/gtk/debian-installer/amd64..
Este es el link verdadero para descargar dicha version...
http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/etch/main/installer-
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:16:23AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 03:42:55AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > > Kernel Team, please give us some guidance on that. Should we use
> > > ide-generic-pci or ide-generic?
> >
>
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 03:42:55AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > Kernel Team, please give us some guidance on that. Should we use
> > ide-generic-pci or ide-generic?
>
> on my TODO, currently fjp has the best write up on the current situation.
>
Your message dated Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:24:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#487670: Nvidia GeForce 8200 chipset not recognised
has caused the Debian Bug report #487670,
regarding Nvidia GeForce 8200 chipset not recognised
to be marked as done.
This means that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Issue presumably also affects Etch+1/2 kernels; clone for that
> clone 487670 -1
Bug#487670: Nvidia GeForce 8200 chipset not recognised
Bug 487670 cloned as bug 487987.
> reassign 487670 linux-2.6 2.6.24-7
Bug#487670: Nvidia GeForce 8200 chipset not
Mike Hommey wrote:
> The fact is users don't *always* have to set this, because far from all
> websites require it. If so many users were impacted, we would be drowned
> under piles of bug reports about this issue, yet, there is only a few of
> them (only one, iirc).
A few user reports of sites t
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 04:39:49PM +0200, Arian Sanusi wrote:
> I installed debian testing (network installation image downloaded in
> June 22) and had afterwards troube with entering the passphrase for the
> encrypted LVM i creted using the debian installer.
>
> I configured the system to use a
Hi guys,
I installed debian testing (network installation image downloaded in
June 22) and had afterwards troube with entering the passphrase for the
encrypted LVM i creted using the debian installer.
I configured the system to use a de-latin1 keyboard layout, which I
think is beeing used du
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 02:51:52PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
Thanks for this, much appreciated. I've been pondering too on this
issue, wondering if we could/should give more warning to (all) qDDs
about upcoming removals. Would it be useful / possible to have a
weekly summary mailed to debian-d
* Frans Pop [Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:45:12 +0200]:
> On Wednesday 25 June 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > tasksel.list is automatically generated, but triggered by hand only, so
> > it would be nice if the tasksel maintainers could mail us whenever
> > there's a change in the Key packages.
> I princip
On Wednesday 25 June 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> tasksel.list is automatically generated, but triggered by hand only, so
> it would be nice if the tasksel maintainers could mail us whenever
> there's a change in the Key packages.
I principle it could/should be updated whenever a new version of ta
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:56:16AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Frans Pop [Wed, 25 Jun 2008 02:23:22 +0200]:
>
> > However, if this package is really blocking an important transition, I
> > (with Otavio being away) also have no objection to letting the current
> > version migrate before the n
Hi folks
Please add s390-tools, s390 only, to the noremove list. It includes
zipl, the bootloader. It is currently not forcible installed as it have
important priority, but the installer relies on its availability.
Bastian
--
There's a way out of any cage.
-- Captain Christopher
Hello,
I've now finished the necessary bits to prevent accidental removal from
testing of certain packages which are not protected by being depended on
by other packages.
The lists of packages are available here:
http://release.debian.org/britney/noremove.d
(I picked up the addition of ixp4xx
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sunday 22 June 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> I've prepared a set of patches against current kernel-wedge to update
> >> it.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >> - ide-generic-pci
> >>
> >> I haven't add it si
On Wednesday 25 June 2008, Jojo wrote:
> i have seen at the new lenny install CD with XFCe and at the usefull
> lenny netinst CD that the lilo package was removed. Do somebody know,
> why?
It was removed from testing by the Debian release managers because the
package had a release critical bug. I
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Jojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i have seen at the new lenny install CD with XFCe and at the usefull
> lenny netinst CD that the lilo package was removed. Do somebody know,
> why?
Oh, thats why my Lenny installation on Macbook is failing too.
Please d
Hello,
i have seen at the new lenny install CD with XFCe and at the usefull
lenny netinst CD that the lilo package was removed. Do somebody know,
why?
For all my installations I use only LiLO as bootloader because I
use only XFS partitions, also for the root partitions. And for this
combination
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 03:48:32AM -0400, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 03:25:08AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > > * Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > > Eric Dorland wrote:
> > > > > Well I think Google gene
* Frans Pop [Wed, 25 Jun 2008 02:23:22 +0200]:
> However, if this package is really blocking an important transition, I
> (with Otavio being away) also have no objection to letting the current
> version migrate before the new upload, on the understanding that the new
> upload with the revert wi
* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 03:25:08AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > * Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > Eric Dorland wrote:
> > > > Well I think Google generally does treat the Iceweasel user agent
> > > > properly.
> > >
> > > Not in the case of m
42 matches
Mail list logo
