On 7/12/2011, at 7:55 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Raúl Porcel
wrote:
On 11/13/2011 01:43 AM, Michael Cree wrote:
[snip]
Is there anyone more knowledgeable than I about gcc who can give us
guidance as to why gcc-4.6 should be enlarging the data segment so
much
tha
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Raúl Porcel wrote:
> On 11/13/2011 01:43 AM, Michael Cree wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> Is there anyone more knowledgeable than I about gcc who can give us
>> guidance as to why gcc-4.6 should be enlarging the data segment so much
>> that the small data model cannot be use
On 11/13/2011 01:43 AM, Michael Cree wrote:
[snip]
>
> Is there anyone more knowledgeable than I about gcc who can give us
> guidance as to why gcc-4.6 should be enlarging the data segment so much
> that the small data model cannot be used? Or is there a fix required in
> the kernel code?
Guess
[Added linux-alpha to CC to increase likelihood of reaching someone who
best knows about this issue.]
On 03/11/11 15:54, carl hansen wrote:
> Problem compiling kernel 3.1, gcc 4.6.1 or .2, latest binutils
>
> I think it's ld error
> google suggested -Wl,--no-relax, didn't make a difference, unles
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:54 PM, carl hansen wrote:
> Problem compiling kernel 3.1, gcc 4.6.1 or .2, latest binutils
>
> I think it's ld error
> google suggested -Wl,--no-relax, didn't make a difference, unless I
> did it wrong
>
>
> ld -static -N --build-id -o .tmp_vmlinux1 -T
> arch/alpha/ke
Problem compiling kernel 3.1, gcc 4.6.1 or .2, latest binutils
I think it's ld error
google suggested -Wl,--no-relax, didn't make a difference, unless I
did it wrong
ld -static -N --build-id -o .tmp_vmlinux1 -T
arch/alpha/kernel/vmlinux.lds arch/alpha/kernel/head.o
init/built-in.o --start-gr
6 matches
Mail list logo
