http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83
Bug #: 83
Summary: ICE: TypeStruct::toCBuffer2
Classification: Unclassified
Product: GDC
Version: development
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Sev
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ibuc...@gdcproject.org
--
Configure bugmai
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84
Bug #: 84
Summary: Writes to struct members marked as shared are not
volatile
Classification: Unclassified
Product: GDC
Version: development
Platform: All
OS/Ve
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84
--- Comment #1 from Johannes Pfau 2013-11-10 09:18:22
GMT ---
In the generated ASM it looks like at least part of the problem is that the
struct is loaded into a register. Of course, then volatile has no effect.
Quoting from c-decl.c:
--
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw 2013-11-10 11:23:45
GMT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> In the generated ASM it looks like at least part of the problem is that the
> struct is loaded into a register. Of course, then volatile has no effect.
>
Yep
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||johannesp...@gmail.com
AssignedTo
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81
--- Comment #3 from hst...@quickfur.ath.cx 2013-12-10 18:45:26 GMT ---
Any workarounds for this bug? I'm kinda stuck on this right now, and can only
use dmd to compile my code.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/userprefs.cgi?ta
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85
Bug #: 85
Summary: GDC does not build for windows host
Classification: Unclassified
Product: GDC
Version: development
Platform: All
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86
Bug #: 86
Summary: initializing of templated struct with union fails
Classification: Unclassified
Product: GDC
Version: 4.8.x
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status:
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87
Bug #: 87
Summary: GDC always ICEs on Windows (also for Windows->???
Cross compilers)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: GDC
Version: development
Platform: All
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88
Bug #: 88
Summary: -flto option causes internal compiler error
Classification: Unclassified
Product: GDC
Version: 4.8.x
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88
--- Comment #1 from secondaryacco...@web.de 2013-12-31 22:42:24 GMT ---
I tried to compile the example given in bug 61 and got the same error with a
very similar stacktrace, so it's probably related.
lto1: interner Compiler-Fehler: in streamer_get
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw 2014-01-01 12:16:56
GMT ---
It is indeed related. It's not immediately obvious why the LTO frontend ICE 's,
but a start would be to get the library built using -flto and see if the same
problem occurs.
--
Configu
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89
Bug #: 89
Summary: Add DMD version to --version output
Classification: Unclassified
Product: GDC
Version: development
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||johannesp...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|std.math.pow produces |MINGW: std.math.pow
|in
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Compilation broken |GDC-4.7: Compilation broken
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90
Bug #: 90
Summary: Some test variations in the test suite are skipped,
possibly hiding bugs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: GDC
Version: development
Platform: All
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91
Bug #: 91
Summary: String literals not always properly zero-terminated
Classification: Unclassified
Product: GDC
Version: development
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Stat
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Comment #6 from Iain Buclaw 2014-01-12 13:53:14
GMT ---
I have no intention to direct any compiler diagnostic output to stdout in the
forseeable future, if that's what you mean.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/userprefs.
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92
Bug #: 92
Summary: ICE in runnable/testenum.d with -g
Classification: Unclassified
Product: GDC
Version: development
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw 2014-01-12 15:54:59
GMT ---
Hmm... dynamic D arrays aren't guaranteed to be zero-terminated. So I'm not
sure what the immediate problem is. :)
See StringExp::toElem for where to tweak the behaviour.
--
Configur
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw 2014-01-12 16:00:11
GMT ---
http://dlang.org/arrays.html
"""
Since strings, however, are not 0 terminated in D, when transferring a pointer
to a string to C, add a terminating 0:
str ~= "\0";
or use the function
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91
--- Comment #3 from Johannes Pfau 2014-01-12 16:51:00
GMT ---
Yes, but string _literals_ must be zero-terminated IIRC. I can't find the
relevant docs on dlang.org but see for example this site:
http://dlang.org/interfaceToC.html "However, string
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91
--- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw 2014-01-12 17:03:57
GMT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Yes, but string _literals_ must be zero-terminated IIRC. I can't find the
> relevant docs on dlang.org but see for example this site:
> http://dlang.org/interf
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93
Bug #: 93
Summary: Build fails on ARM with static assert 8u == 4u
Classification: Unclassified
Product: GDC
Version: 4.8.x
Platform: ARM
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94
Bug #: 94
Summary: ICE in bootstrapping with gcc HEAD
Classification: Unclassified
Product: GDC
Version: development
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102
--- Comment #2 from Mike 2014-02-01 11:27:25 GMT ---
Created attachment 61
--> http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/attachment.cgi?id=61
linking.txt
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiv
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97
Mike changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|gdc |libgdruntime
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzill
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103
Bug #: 103
Summary: -fdeps Doesn't Handle Multiple Source Files
Classification: Unclassified
Product: GDC
Version: development
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Other
Status:
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102
Mike changed:
What|Removed |Added
Platform|x86 |x86_64
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gdc
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105
Bug #: 105
Summary: improve documentation about gdc internals
Classification: Unclassified
Product: GDC
Version: development
Platform: All
OS/Version: Other
Status: NE
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95
Bug #: 95
Summary: Definition of _tls_data_array with version( OSX ) in
thread.d
Classification: Unclassified
Product: GDC
Version: development
Platform: x86
OS
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101
Bug #: 101
Summary: DLL sample for GDC
Classification: Unclassified
Product: GDC
Version: development
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity: m
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102
--- Comment #1 from Mike 2014-02-01 11:27:04 GMT ---
Created attachment 60
--> http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/attachment.cgi?id=60
missing_symbols2.txt
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You a
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97
Bug #: 97
Summary: Experiencing intermittent crash in rt_init() when
loading DLL
Classification: Unclassified
Product: GDC
Version: development
Platform: x86
OS
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104
Bug #: 104
Summary: gcc-4.4.5 / D2.052 / cygwin: configure error for
phobos/__libc_stack_end
Classification: Unclassified
Product: GDC
Version: development
Platform: A
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98
Bug #: 98
Summary: MinGW: stack trace on exception needs enhanced
Classification: Unclassified
Product: GDC
Version: development
Platform: x86
OS/Version: MinGW
Status:
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99
Bug #: 99
Summary: -fsection-anchors broken on ARM
Classification: Unclassified
Product: GDC
Version: development
Platform: ARM
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99
--- Comment #1 from Mike 2014-02-01 11:02:30 GMT ---
Johannes Pfau - 2011-10-05
**
OK, the ClassZ size is bigger as the class implements an interface. This code
interface A {}
class B : A {}
compiled with
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102
Bug #: 102
Summary: [OSX][64-bit] Missing symbols of libgphobos2.a
Classification: Unclassified
Product: GDC
Version: development
Platform: x86
OS/Version: OSX
Status:
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100
Bug #: 100
Summary: add shared lib support
Classification: Unclassified
Product: GDC
Version: development
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severit
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98
--- Comment #1 from Mike 2014-02-01 10:41:48 GMT ---
This was migrated from
https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/issue/348/mingw-stack-trace-on-exception-needs
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96
Bug #: 96
Summary: phobos build doesn't use CFLAGS_FOR_BUILD in most
cases
Classification: Unclassified
Product: GDC
Version: development
Platform: x86
OS/Versi
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82
orc...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|WORKSFORME
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw 2
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82
--- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw 2014-02-02 22:01:34
GMT ---
I probably just need to nudge Matthias to update the gdc patches in Debian. I'm
sure their packaged version is long out of date.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/us
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82
--- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw 2014-02-02 22:02:24
GMT ---
Or maybe you should raise a new debian bug against the gdc package requesting
for the sources to be rebased with current upstream.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw 2014-02-03 00:23:36
GMT ---
https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/commit/9cafc0646fde296db5d96c8d3383cf7be58e068e
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are re
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||and...@erdani.com
--- Comment #5 fro
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
Andrei Alexandrescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||and...@erdani.com
--- Comment #7 fr
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|ibuc...@gdcproject.org |johannesp...@gmail.com
--- Comment #8 fro
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ibuc...@gdcproject.org
--- Comment #9 from
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
--- Comment #10 from Johannes Pfau 2014-02-12 12:39:42
GMT ---
Indeed, somehow feels like cheating though ;-)
@Iain do you agree with the solution or should I open a pull request for
further discussion?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gd
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
--- Comment #11 from Andrei Alexandrescu 2014-02-12
16:37:46 GMT ---
I'm fine with paying for a solution that was almost done, unless you guys would
like me to reallocate the monies to another, more important bug. Please advise.
--
Configure bu
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
--- Comment #12 from Johannes Pfau 2014-02-13 08:06:11
GMT ---
I had a look at the other bugs but it's difficult to estimate how much work is
needed for those that qualify as 'more important' (NRVO, non-POD types). NRVO
needs some work/clarificat
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8
--- Comment #6 from Johannes Pfau 2014-02-13 08:17:33
GMT ---
Iain, do you want to look into this again?
I read some of the old discussions and the dlang.org pull request and to
summarize:
* All functions should be evaluated LTR, even extern(C)
*
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8
--- Comment #7 from Johannes Pfau 2014-02-13 08:18:34
GMT ---
Another link for reference: Pull request for the spec which demands LTR
evaluation:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/6
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gd
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8
--- Comment #8 from Johannes Pfau 2014-02-13 08:23:04
GMT ---
And one more link: DMD bug:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6620
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84
--- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw 2014-02-13 08:27:22
GMT ---
(If alternatives is what we should go for)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are wat
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84
--- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw 2014-02-13 08:26:55
GMT ---
I'm pretty persistent on forcing shared variables to not go into registers.
However we need a better system for setting TREE_ADDRESSABLE on the type
without causing GCC backend to panic
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8
--- Comment #9 from Iain Buclaw 2014-02-13 08:30:13
GMT ---
LTR is already enforced for LINKd functions. See d-codegen.cc(d_build_call)
// Evaluate the argument before passing to the function.
// Needed for left to right evaluation.
if (tf->link
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8
--- Comment #10 from Iain Buclaw 2014-02-13 08:37:03
GMT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Iain, do you want to look into this again?
>
> I read some of the old discussions and the dlang.org pull request and to
> summarize:
> * All functions should
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84
--- Comment #6 from Johannes Pfau 2014-02-13 15:01:52
GMT ---
Not into registers might be OK, but if we have code like this:
-
shared int a;
void doSomething()
{
for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
atomicStore(a, i);
}
--
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8
--- Comment #11 from Johannes Pfau 2014-02-13 17:25:20
GMT ---
OK. So do you want to fix this or shall I?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are w
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8
--- Comment #12 from Andrei Alexandrescu 2014-02-13
18:15:27 GMT ---
Yes, I agree all parameters should be evaluated LTR. In fact LTR is more
general than that - in an assignment e1 = e2, e1 should be evaluated first.
Also in a computed function c
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8
--- Comment #13 from Iain Buclaw 2014-02-13 19:21:54
GMT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Yes, I agree all parameters should be evaluated LTR. In fact LTR is more
> general than that - in an assignment e1 = e2, e1 should be evaluated first.
> Also
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8
--- Comment #14 from Iain Buclaw 2014-02-13 19:57:41
GMT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> OK. So do you want to fix this or shall I?
I'm pretty tied up getting gdb D into shape, and working with a publishing
company in reviewing a new D2 book, and
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
--- Comment #13 from Iain Buclaw 2014-02-14 09:50:14
GMT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> I had a look at the other bugs but it's difficult to estimate how much work is
> needed for those that qualify as 'more important' (NRVO, non-POD types). NRV
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
--- Comment #14 from Iain Buclaw 2014-02-14 10:09:13
GMT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> @Andrei I already fixed that in the ARM branch. Sorry for not mentioning this
> before. The GDC master branch was broken for some time and I couldn't merge
>
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
--- Comment #15 from Johannes Pfau 2014-02-14 19:15:01
GMT ---
Yes, it's kinda sad. However I don't think any other solution will work.
TREE_NOTHROW means 'wont ever throw anything' and the backend seems to rely on
this so we just can't map that
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
--- Comment #17 from Iain Buclaw 2014-02-15 12:53:46
GMT ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Here's also a reduced test case:
> (compile with -frelease)
> -
> nothrow void main()
> {
> throw new Error("Fail");
> }
> --
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106
Bug #: 106
Summary: [ARM] pragma(mangle) not working if -fsection-anchors
is enabled
Classification: Unclassified
Product: GDC
Version: development
Platform: ARM
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|ibuc...@gdcp
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ibuc...@gdcproject.org
--- Comment #1 from
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|FIXED
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
--- Comment #18 from Johannes Pfau 2014-02-15 19:55:53
GMT ---
> It's called unrecoverable for a reason. :o)
I actually thought about that as well but I think people will just blame GDC if
we're the only compiler were Errors are really unrecover
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Johannes Pfa
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
401 - 500 of 758 matches
Mail list logo
