[Issue 22] Build fails with macro expansion failures for TARGET_ANDROID

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ibuc...@gdcproject.org --- Comment #3 from

[Issue 24] New: GDC backend uses invalid type when using deferencing toPtr on a static array inside of a struct.

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24 Bug #: 24 Summary: GDC backend uses invalid type when using deferencing toPtr on a static array inside of a struct. Classification: Unclassified Product: GDC Version: 4.8.x

[Issue 24] GDC backend uses invalid type when using deferencing toPtr on a static array inside of a struct.

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24 --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw 2012-10-30 13:27:56 UTC --- This is a bug in the frontend. It should not be generating code like this: if (c.b) { } Where the condition is a non-scalar type. -- Configure issuemail: http://gdcproje

[Issue 23] undefined reference to `_d_arrayappendcTX'

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23 lt.infiltra...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 24] GDC backend uses invalid type when using deferencing toPtr on a static array inside of a struct.

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Green 2012-11-01 20:23:11 UTC --- When dealing with "if (c.b)" GDC does the correct thing and throws an error. In this case b is of type char[1] and we're taking the pointer using .ptr . The type then becomes char*. A

[Issue 24] GDC backend uses invalid type when using deferencing toPtr on a static array inside of a struct.

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24 --- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw 2012-11-01 22:32:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > When dealing with "if (c.b)" GDC does the correct thing and throws an error. > > In this case b is of type char[1] and we're taking the pointer using .ptr .

[Issue 25] New: Segmentation fault on a simple template class; no segfault if substitute class by structure

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25 Bug #: 25 Summary: Segmentation fault on a simple template class; no segfault if substitute class by structure Classification: Unclassified Product: GDC Version: 4.7.x

[Issue 25] Segmentation fault on a simple template class; no segfault if substitute class by structure

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25 Alexander Samoilov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #15|the same code as in the |the code that segfaults descr

[Issue 25] Segmentation fault on a simple template class; no segfault if substitute class by structure

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25 Alexander Samoilov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexander.samoi...@gmail.co

[Issue 25] Segmentation fault on a simple template class; no segfault if substitute class by structure

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25 art.08...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||art.08...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 f

[Issue 25] Segmentation fault on a simple template class; no segfault if substitute class by structure

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Samoilov 2012-11-04 10:32:03 UTC --- Thanks for clarification. Nice to hear that it isn't a compiler bug. -- Configure issuemail: http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving thi

[Issue 25] Segmentation fault on a simple template class; no segfault if substitute class by structure

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 22] Build fails with macro expansion failures for TARGET_ANDROID

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22 Johannes Pfau changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 26] New: Patching fails for gcc-4.8-20121118 snapshot

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26 Bug #: 26 Summary: Patching fails for gcc-4.8-20121118 snapshot Classification: Unclassified Product: GDC Version: development Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Issue 26] Patching fails for gcc-4.8-20121118 snapshot

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26 --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw 2012-11-24 10:59:20 UTC --- I suppose you got a copy of gdc sources from somewhere else other than the main repository. We don't patch any backend target files... -- Configure issuemail: http://gdcproject.org/bu

[Issue 26] Patching fails for gcc-4.8-20121118 snapshot

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26 Moritz Maxeiner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 27] New: Undefined interface functions when inheriting from two sources.

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27 Bug #: 27 Summary: Undefined interface functions when inheriting from two sources. Classification: Unclassified Product: GDC Version: development Platform: x86

[Issue 27] Undefined interface functions when inheriting from two sources.

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Green 2012-12-04 03:09:22 UTC --- Created attachment 16 --> http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16 A.s - Assembly output of A.d -- Configure issuemail: http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=em

[Issue 27] Undefined interface functions when inheriting from two sources.

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Green 2012-12-04 03:09:42 UTC --- Created attachment 17 --> http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17 B.s - Assembly output of B.d -- Configure issuemail: http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=em

[Issue 27] Undefined interface functions when inheriting from two sources.

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Green 2012-12-04 03:09:58 UTC --- Created attachment 18 --> http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18 main.s - Assembly output of main.d -- Configure issuemail: http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?

[Issue 27] Undefined interface functions when inheriting from two sources.

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27 Daniel Green changed: What|Removed |Added OS/Version|Other |Linux --- Comment #4 from Daniel Green 20

[Issue 27] Undefined interface functions when inheriting from two sources.

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Green 2012-12-04 03:10:50 UTC --- This occurs with head on GCC 4.8 on linux. -- Configure issuemail: http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are w

[Issue 28] New: synchronized block causes memory corruption with cross compiler

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28 Bug #: 28 Summary: synchronized block causes memory corruption with cross compiler Classification: Unclassified Product: GDC Version: development Platform: MIPS

[Issue 29] New: std.string.format and std.string.text makes "SEGMENTATION FAULT"

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29 Bug #: 29 Summary: std.string.format and std.string.text makes "SEGMENTATION FAULT" Classification: Unclassified Product: GDC Version: 4.7.x Platform: x86 OS/Ve

[Issue 16] Programs that use std.parallelism.taskPool hang

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16 jerro.pub...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jerro.pub...@gmail.com --- Commen

[Issue 16] Programs that use std.parallelism.taskPool hang

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16 Johannes Pfau changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 16] Programs that use std.parallelism.taskPool hang

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16 --- Comment #3 from Johannes Pfau 2012-12-16 09:25:45 UTC --- http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9163 -- Configure issuemail: http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Issue 24] GDC backend uses invalid type when using deferencing toPtr on a static array inside of a struct.

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24 --- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw 2012-12-18 13:56:23 UTC --- https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1382 -- Configure issuemail: http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Issue 30] New: Finalization failure in complex case

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30 Bug #: 30 Summary: Finalization failure in complex case Classification: Unclassified Product: GDC Version: development Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW

[Issue 30] Finalization failure in complex case

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30 --- Comment #1 from David Brown 2012-12-28 09:21:08 UTC --- Created attachment 20 --> http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20 Failure output from example program. -- Configure issuemail: http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi

[Issue 30] Finalization failure in complex case

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30 David Brown changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dl...@davidb.org -- Configure issuemail: h

[Issue 31] New: ICE in getVThis

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31 Bug #: 31 Summary: ICE in getVThis Classification: Unclassified Product: GDC Version: development Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: nor

[Issue 32] New: Failing phobos unit tests:

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32 Bug #: 32 Summary: Failing phobos unit tests: Classification: Unclassified Product: GDC Version: development Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Se

[Issue 33] New: Illegal instruction reordering with O2

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33 Bug #: 33 Summary: Illegal instruction reordering with O2 Classification: Unclassified Product: GDC Version: development Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW

[Issue 34] New: ICE with -fdump-ipa-cgraph

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34 Bug #: 34 Summary: ICE with -fdump-ipa-cgraph Classification: Unclassified Product: GDC Version: development Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Se

[Issue 34] ICE with -fdump-ipa-cgraph

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34 Johannes Pfau changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|Normal |Low CC|

[Issue 29] std.string.format and std.string.text makes "SEGMENTATION FAULT"

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29 ajbonko...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ajbonko...@gmail.com -- Configure

[Issue 27] Undefined interface functions when inheriting from two sources.

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27 --- Comment #6 from Daniel Green 2013-01-08 18:41:52 UTC --- This is identical to the thunk issue we had a while ago. It broke with this change. https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/commit/cd8bb6d03ae3134a4976689eab312e2bb57701fc#gcc/d/d-obj

[Issue 35] New: Potentially wrong code with template alias parameters and nested functions

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35 Bug #: 35 Summary: Potentially wrong code with template alias parameters and nested functions Classification: Unclassified Product: GDC Version: development Platform: A

[Issue 35] Potentially wrong code with template alias parameters and nested functions

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35 --- Comment #1 from Johannes Pfau 2013-01-12 18:17:40 UTC --- Created attachment 25 --> http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25 test case 2 -- Configure issuemail: http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You

[Issue 35] Potentially wrong code with template alias parameters and nested functions

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35 --- Comment #2 from Johannes Pfau 2013-01-12 18:18:21 UTC --- Created attachment 26 --> http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26 Simple patch -- Configure issuemail: http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- Yo

[Issue 35] Potentially wrong code with template alias parameters and nested functions

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35 Johannes Pfau changed: What|Removed |Added CC||johannesp...@gmail.com -- Configure issu

[Issue 35] Potentially wrong code with template alias parameters and nested functions

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35 --- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw 2013-01-12 18:23:58 UTC --- Looks fine to me, though the whitespace looks a bit off. :) -- Configure issuemail: http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Issue 35] Potentially wrong code with template alias parameters and nested functions

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35 --- Comment #4 from Johannes Pfau 2013-01-12 18:29:07 UTC --- Yes, the patch was only a quick test, it's not ready for merging. It's a little bit annoying that it can't detect complicated cases as the hasNestedArgs check in the frontend doesn't d

[Issue 36] New: Templates declared in functions have wrong scope

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36 Bug #: 36 Summary: Templates declared in functions have wrong scope Classification: Unclassified Product: GDC Version: development Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux St

[Issue 36] Templates declared in functions have wrong scope

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36 --- Comment #1 from Johannes Pfau 2013-01-19 12:23:57 UTC --- Created attachment 28 --> http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28 test case 1 -- Configure issuemail: http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You

[Issue 36] Templates declared in functions have wrong scope

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36 --- Comment #2 from Johannes Pfau 2013-01-19 12:24:17 UTC --- Created attachment 29 --> http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29 test case 2 -- Configure issuemail: http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You

[Issue 36] Templates declared in functions have wrong scope

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36 Johannes Pfau changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #29 is|0 |1 obsolete|

[Issue 36] Templates declared in functions have wrong scope

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36 --- Comment #4 from Johannes Pfau 2013-01-19 12:25:56 UTC --- Created attachment 31 --> http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31 test 3a -- Configure issuemail: http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 36] Templates declared in functions have wrong scope

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36 --- Comment #5 from Johannes Pfau 2013-01-19 12:26:17 UTC --- Created attachment 32 --> http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32 test 3b -- Configure issuemail: http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Issue 36] Templates declared in functions have wrong scope

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36 Johannes Pfau changed: What|Removed |Added CC||johannesp...@gmail.com -- Configure issu

[Issue 24] GDC backend uses invalid type when using deferencing toPtr on a static array inside of a struct.

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24 Johannes Pfau changed: What|Removed |Added CC||johannesp...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 fro

[Issue 31] ICE in getVThis

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31 Johannes Pfau changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 37] New: Inlining fails for functions with const parameters

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37 Bug #: 37 Summary: Inlining fails for functions with const parameters Classification: Unclassified Product: GDC Version: development Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux

[Issue 37] Inlining fails for functions with const parameters

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37 --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw 2013-02-19 09:24:42 UTC --- When you say force inlining, I take it you mean you are doing some trickery in the debugger. :-) -- Configure issuemail: http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ---

[Issue 37] Inlining fails for functions with const parameters

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37 --- Comment #2 from Johannes Pfau 2013-02-19 11:43:55 UTC --- No, that error message was also reported by jerro and he added some pragma(always_inline) implementation to his copy of gdc. The error is reported either from ipa-inline.c or from ipa

[Issue 37] Inlining fails for functions with const parameters

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37 --- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw 2013-02-19 12:59:31 UTC --- That's lovely. always_inline attribute has been removed from the set of available pragmas. Actually I might remove all gcc-related pragmas in the near future and replace with @attribut

[Issue 38] New: gdc --version should indicate D version in use

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38 Bug #: 38 Summary: gdc --version should indicate D version in use Classification: Unclassified Product: GDC Version: development Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status

[Issue 38] gdc --version should indicate D version in use

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38 --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw 2013-02-22 17:43:19 UTC --- For gdmd, maybe. For gdc, probably not. -- Configure issuemail: http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are watc

[Issue 38] gdc --version should indicate D version in use

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38 --- Comment #2 from Joe Wakeling 2013-02-22 17:45:11 UTC --- I thought you might say that -- I presume it's related to GCC policy? -- Configure issuemail: http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mai

[Issue 38] gdc --version should indicate D version in use

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38 --- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw 2013-02-22 17:51:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > I thought you might say that -- I presume it's related to GCC policy? There is no way to describe the language supported by GCC in terms of a specific version

[Issue 36] Templates declared in functions have wrong scope

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36 Johannes Pfau changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 35] Potentially wrong code with template alias parameters and nested functions

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35 Johannes Pfau changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 24] GDC backend uses invalid type when using deferencing toPtr on a static array inside of a struct.

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24 Johannes Pfau changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 34] ICE with -fdump-ipa-cgraph

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34 Johannes Pfau changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 37] Inlining fails for functions with const parameters

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37 Johannes Pfau changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 39] New: gdmd segfault during compilation of simple matrix multiplication routine

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39 Bug #: 39 Summary: gdmd segfault during compilation of simple matrix multiplication routine Classification: Unclassified Product: GDC Version: 4.7.x Platform: x86_64

[Issue 39] gdmd segfault during compilation of simple matrix multiplication routine

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39 --- Comment #1 from J 2013-03-06 06:42:42 UTC --- gdb stack trace to help localize the problem: $gdb gdc (gdb) # have to follow the child process or we aren't tracing the process that crashes: (gdb) set follow-fork-mode child (gdb) set args gdmd_

[Issue 39] gdmd segfault during compilation of simple matrix multiplication routine

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39 --- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw 2013-03-06 08:45:39 UTC --- Please include all files related to the bug, or reduce your testcase down further. Thanks Iain -- Configure issuemail: http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- Y

[Issue 38] gdc --version should indicate D version in use

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 40] New: Missing "flatten" and "inline" GCC attributes in GDC

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40 Bug #: 40 Summary: Missing "flatten" and "inline" GCC attributes in GDC Classification: Unclassified Product: GDC Version: development Platform: All URL: http://forum.dlang.

[Issue 40] Missing "flatten" and "inline" GCC attributes in GDC

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40 art.08...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||art.08...@gmail.com -- Configure is

[Issue 41] New: gdmd commit suicide when using -femit-templates

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41 Bug #: 41 Summary: gdmd commit suicide when using -femit-templates Classification: Unclassified Product: GDC Version: 4.8.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: N

[Issue 41] gdmd commit suicide when using -femit-templates

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 42] New: Non-POD types not implemented

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42 Bug #: 42 Summary: Non-POD types not implemented Classification: Unclassified Product: GDC Version: development Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW

[Issue 27] Undefined interface functions when inheriting from two sources.

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 27] Undefined interface functions when inheriting from two sources.

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27 --- Comment #8 from Daniel Green 2013-03-13 15:42:08 UTC --- > Does the weakref solution still produce phantom crashes in binutils for MinGW? Looks good. Couldn't reproduce the weakref crashes and some more complicated testcases passed. -- Con

[Issue 27] Undefined interface functions when inheriting from two sources.

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27 --- Comment #9 from Iain Buclaw 2013-03-13 16:23:16 UTC --- Wicked, thanks Daniel. -- Configure issuemail: http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are watching all issue ch

[Issue 43] New: passing va_list by ref causes ICE

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43 Bug #: 43 Summary: passing va_list by ref causes ICE Classification: Unclassified Product: GDC Version: development Platform: x86 OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Issue 43] passing va_list by ref causes ICE

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 33] Illegal instruction reordering with O2

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 44] New: "naked" GCC attribute needed to properly support fibers on Windows

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44 Bug #: 44 Summary: "naked" GCC attribute needed to properly support fibers on Windows Classification: Unclassified Product: GDC Version: development Platform: All

[Issue 44] "naked" GCC attribute needed to properly support fibers on Windows

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44 --- Comment #1 from Benjamin Thaut 2013-03-17 19:44:01 UTC --- I meant "core.threads" instead of "core.traits" -- Configure issuemail: http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- Y

[Issue 44] "naked" GCC attribute needed to properly support fibers on Windows

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44 --- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw 2013-03-17 19:48:06 UTC --- Nope, someone just needs to implement a generic version for Windows. We don't use IASM implementations. -- Configure issuemail: http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Issue 44] "naked" GCC attribute needed to properly support fibers on Windows

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44 --- Comment #3 from Benjamin Thaut 2013-03-17 19:54:51 UTC --- What do you mean by "generic version" ? The fibers which are offered by the WinAPI are not a suiteable replacement. -- Configure issuemail: http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/userprefs.

[Issue 44] MinGW: Add support for D fibers.

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44 Daniel Green changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ven...@gmail.com Summary|"naked

[Issue 44] MinGW: Add support for D fibers.

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44 Daniel Green changed: What|Removed |Added Component|gdc |libgdruntime -- Configure issuemail: http

[Issue 45] New: gdmd does not accept rdmd output

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45 Bug #: 45 Summary: gdmd does not accept rdmd output Classification: Unclassified Product: GDC Version: development Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW S

[Issue 45] gdmd does not accept rdmd output

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45 Vladimir Panteleev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gdcproject@thecybershadow.n

[Issue 45] gdmd does not accept rdmd output

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45 Dicebot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 46] New: gdmd --help gives out of date documentation links

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46 Bug #: 46 Summary: gdmd --help gives out of date documentation links Classification: Unclassified Product: GDC Version: development Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux S

[Issue 46] gdmd --help gives out of date documentation links

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46 --- Comment #1 from Joe Wakeling 2013-03-20 15:05:32 UTC --- Created attachment 34 --> http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34 Patch to fix the issue I think the attached patch should fix things. I've deliberately missed out the G

[Issue 47] New: ICE when mixing in functions containing inline asm

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47 Bug #: 47 Summary: ICE when mixing in functions containing inline asm Classification: Unclassified Product: GDC Version: 4.8.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status

[Issue 47] ICE when mixing in functions containing inline asm

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 47] ICE when mixing in functions containing inline asm

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47 --- Comment #2 from jerro.pub...@gmail.com 2013-03-20 19:23:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/commit/777f40c8b01e1efb21e5569cc527c74bd1074b98 Well that was fast :) -- Configure issuemail: http://gdcpr

[Issue 47] ICE when mixing in functions containing inline asm

http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47 --- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw 2013-03-20 19:27:38 UTC --- Total time spent on bug: Probably 120 seconds, idk. I step aside for a moment to serve myself dinner. -- Configure issuemail: http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --

[Bug 29] std.string.format and std.string.text makes "SEGMENTATION FAULT"

http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 5] std.file: struct_stat64 wrong for ARM

http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 32] Failing phobos unit tests:

http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32 --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw 2013-04-04 14:50:18 UTC --- Fixed GC-related problem in the compiler. https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/commit/0adf38c953db12a50e7fac48db321a49739f9b99 I wonder if those segv's you've found are now fixed.

[Bug 32] Failing phobos unit tests:

http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32 --- Comment #2 from Johannes Pfau 2013-04-04 18:45:59 UTC --- I'll see if I can run the unit tests again but I used a custom gdc branch with patches which allows skipping failing tests. That code is quite outdated now so I have to update it first

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >