[Issue 1690] Implement pragma(lib, "")

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1690 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-08 04:02 --- This is fixed in DMD now - see issue 1663 - so no reason to not merge into GDC ... --

[Issue 2536] New: ClassInfo.interfaces contains null sub-ClassInfos

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2536 Summary: ClassInfo.interfaces contains null sub-ClassInfos Product: DGCC aka GDC Version: 0.24 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: wrong-code Sever

[Issue 2536] ClassInfo.interfaces contains null sub-ClassInfos

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2536 --- Comment #1 from larsi...@igesund.net 2008-12-22 17:03 --- I think this one has been fixed in a later revision? Look in the closed reports. --

[Issue 2536] ClassInfo.interfaces contains null sub-ClassInfos

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2536 --- Comment #2 from fvbom...@wxs.nl 2008-12-22 18:48 --- Thanks for that. It does indeed look suspiciously like #1844. So I guess if the version Ubuntu ships is < r212 (which fixed that one) this should be marked as a duplicate of tha

[Issue 2536] ClassInfo.interfaces contains null sub-ClassInfos

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2536 fvbom...@wxs.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 1844] Problems using dynamic cast on x86-64 platform

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1844 fvbom...@wxs.nl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fvbom...@wxs.nl --- Comment #7

[Issue 2584] New: GDC on ARM does not honor volatile

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2584 Summary: GDC on ARM does not honor volatile Product: DGCC aka GDC Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2

[Issue 2584] GDC on ARM does not honor volatile

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2584 --- Comment #1 from default_357-l...@yahoo.de 2009-01-13 05:31 --- Sorry. Please disregard for now. I'm seeing conflicting results. --

[Issue 2584] GDC on ARM does not honor volatile

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2584 --- Comment #2 from default_357-l...@yahoo.de 2009-01-13 05:44 --- Right. Here we go. I had testcased it incorrectly. The code to reproduce the error is struct Test { uint* ptr; uint write(uint i) { volatile (*ptr) = i; return

[Issue 2688] New: struct assignment crashes on darwin ppc64

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2688 Summary: struct assignment crashes on darwin ppc64 Product: DGCC aka GDC Version: unspecified Platform: Macintosh OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Issue 1968] boxer.d does not work

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1968 Mike Kinney changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mike.kin...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 f

[Issue 1968] boxer.d does not work

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1968 Fawzi Mohamed changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 1921] struct literal segfaults for structs with nested union/struct

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1921 Tomasz Sowiński changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tomeks...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 f

[Issue 1921] struct literal segfaults for structs with nested union/struct

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1921 --- Comment #3 from Witold Baryluk 2009-12-16 16:39:05 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) > Not sure if related but I also got stung by nested structs in bug 3622. I don't think so. This bug is filled for GDC, D compiler using GCC backend. And

[Issue 2688] struct assignment crashes on darwin ppc64

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2688 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ibuc...@ubuntu.com AssignedTo|dvd

[Issue 1136] please add -pipe support to gdmd

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1136 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 1145] bad codegen with ulong+float

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1145 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 1751] char** null after Compilation

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1751 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 1044] Internal error: Illegal instruction (program cc1d) - nocompile/c/const_32_B.d

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1044 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 2102] Invalid code generated with nested delegates

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2102 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 1930] Internal compiler error: constructing classes defined inside functions

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1930 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 1921] struct literal segfaults for structs with nested union/struct

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1921 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 2291] negative default values for int template arguments -> duplicate symbol

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2291 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 2421] Struct assignment is broken (nulls target before evaluating source)

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2421 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 1691] Provide build3() for older compilers and replace all build() statements with it.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1691 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 1296] ICE when object.d is missing things

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1296 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 1921] struct literal segfaults for structs with nested union/struct

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1921 --- Comment #5 from Witold Baryluk 2010-08-08 09:24:28 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > I cannot reproduce this using gdc 0.25 with gcc-4.1.2 and gcc-4.3.5. You are right. Works with gcc version 4.3.5 (Debian 1:1.046-4.3.5-2) Thanks, for

[Issue 747] undefined reference to `.LDASM1'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=747 --- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw 2010-08-08 10:45:44 PDT --- asm_jmp_02_A.d and asm_jmp_02_B.d seem to build OK here - GDC 0.25. asm_jmp_02_C.d, however fails to build. After a little bit of debugging, it seems to be a quirk of GCC's backend, ra

[Issue 1689] Segfaults for nested array allocation with GDC

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1689 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 18] int foo[0] accept -- what's its semantics?

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=18 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 1041] regression: incorrect code generation for scope(exit) inside switch

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1041 Michael P changed: What|Removed |Added CC||baseball@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from

[Issue 1041] regression: incorrect code generation for scope(exit) inside switch

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1041 --- Comment #6 from Michael P 2010-08-11 20:46:40 PDT --- Very closely related bug with case statements. Changing the line "default:" to "case 3:" produces the error "case cannot be in different try block level from switch" in dmd, but again n

[Issue 1041] regression: incorrect code generation for scope(exit) inside switch

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1041 --- Comment #7 from Iain Buclaw 2010-08-12 11:36:49 PDT --- To be honest I was kinda unsure about this, as I did generally agree that this should be valid for the reason that the body of a SwitchStatement is ScopeStatement. And although the co

[Issue 1041] regression: incorrect code generation for scope(exit) inside switch

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1041 --- Comment #8 from Iain Buclaw 2010-08-12 16:59:37 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=715) quick hack for issue 1041 Attaching a my quick rudimentary kludge. It's not pretty to my eyes, but it does the job. What is does, is save the currentSc

[Issue 1041] regression: incorrect code generation for scope(exit) inside switch

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1041 --- Comment #9 from Iain Buclaw 2010-08-13 00:32:59 PDT --- Just to note before I'm off, no you cannot build phobos using the above. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this

[Issue 2079] Phobos unit tests fail assertion on std/std/string.d

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2079 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 1041] regression: incorrect code generation for scope(exit) inside switch

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1041 --- Comment #10 from Michael P 2010-08-13 13:24:01 PDT --- Well, the error in std/string.d is quite odd, because it has nothing to do with switch statements. Commenting out the code in ifind in the else statement to look like this: (Look line

[Issue 1041] regression: incorrect code generation for scope(exit) inside switch

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1041 --- Comment #11 from Iain Buclaw 2010-08-14 02:11:55 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=716) issue 1041 attempt #2 Second round, works without frizzles. Though I'd still prefer it if you'd take it with a pinch of salt. :-) IMO, I think it wo

[Issue 1041] regression: incorrect code generation for scope(exit) inside switch

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1041 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #716 is|1 |0 patch|

[Issue 1041] regression: incorrect code generation for scope(exit) inside switch

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1041 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 1813] static function parametrized with alias used with delegate throws an internal compiler error.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1813 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 1669] this.outer in nested classes gives a bogus pointer

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1669 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 1822] String slicing in 64-bit gdc causes spurious warnings

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1822 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 833] stdint.h not available with solaris

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=833 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 834] SegV in gdc during actest.d on Solaris

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=834 --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw 2010-09-12 14:37:22 PDT --- GCC-3.3 is no longer supported, sorry. If you could test GCC-3.4 (or later) on Solaris 10, would value any feedback/issues/bugs there. The most I know is Solaris isn't supported by the

[Issue 1911] Link error when creating array of typedefs with default initializer

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1911 --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw 2010-11-03 14:44:14 PDT --- FYI, this issue is fixed, I'll push it into the tip later. -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Issue 1911] Link error when creating array of typedefs with default initializer

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1911 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 670] _argptr is char *

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=670 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #6

[Issue 6] flesh out dirent struct

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6 Andrei Alexandrescu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||and...@metalanguage.com --- Comment

[Issue 6] flesh out dirent struct

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6 Brad Roberts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 670] _argptr is char *

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=670 --- Comment #7 from Iain Buclaw 2011-01-16 06:45:15 PST --- (In reply to comment #6) > va_list is a void* on 64 bit targets, too. I originally had it as a pointer to > that wacky struct required for the 64 bit C ABI, but it works better to treat

[Issue 1666] 64-bit gdc programs cannot allocate large arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1666 --- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw 2011-01-30 03:03:50 PST --- This is certainly no longer reproducible using D2 on the 0.26 prelease, -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this m

[Issue 1066] Variadic arguments being passed in registers

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1066 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 2004] no clean way to dynamically loop over va_args

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2004 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 1666] 64-bit gdc programs cannot allocate large arrays

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1666 Brad Roberts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 1231] GDC std.intrinsic: inline asm for x86 & x86_64

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1231 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 670] _argptr is char *

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=670 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 700] unexpected __t8__ in global symbol __t8__D3std6stream20__T12TArrayStreamThZ12TArrayStream9availableMFZk

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=700 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 2297] on LinuxAmd64 some creal operations bring into scope a faulty version of powl

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2297 --- Comment #1 from Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo 2011-10-11 08:16:10 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=1037) Fawzi Mohamed's case as attachment Added Fawzi Mohamed's case as attachment -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/

[Issue 2297] on LinuxAmd64 some creal operations bring into scope a faulty version of powl

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2297 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manuel.montez...@gmail.c

[Issue 1470] "extern (C)" inside function crashes gdc

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1470 --- Comment #3 from Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo 2011-10-11 08:29:01 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=1038) Adding Ulrich Singer's testcase as file Adding Ulrich Singer's testcase as file -- Configure issuemail: http://d.puremagic.com/iss

[Issue 1470] "extern (C)" inside function crashes gdc

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1470 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manuel.montez...@gmail.c

[Issue 1470] "extern (C)" inside function crashes gdc

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1470 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 2191] GDC fraudulently defines D_InlineAsmX86

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2191 --- Comment #6 from Iain Buclaw 2012-01-24 13:59:15 PST --- Just got a bump of this ticket in my inbox. For an update from my part, as of https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/changeset/8da0d2cf8366 GDC no longer emits any of the D_InlineAsm fami

[Issue 656] lazy in main

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=656 yebblies changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bra...@puremagic.com --- Comment #5 from yeb

[Issue 1755] linker problems in mac os x 10.5

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1755 Walter Bright changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@digitalmars.com --- Comment #

[Issue 1755] linker problems in mac os x 10.5

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1755 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 2191] GDC fraudulently defines D_InlineAsmX86

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2191 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 1690] Implement pragma(lib, "")

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1690 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 1805] GDC does not implement the D calling convention

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1805 --- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw 2012-03-12 08:27:23 PDT --- After some discussion a while ago, GCC core devs are not too keen on adding yet another calling convention to i386 on top of what's already supported - that makes this report a wontfix

[Issue 1237] gdmd should use dmd.conf and $DFLAGS

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1237 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 1] asm enter and leave bug

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1 --- Comment #9 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2012-05-04 10:41:20 PDT --- Commit pushed to dmd-1.x at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/commit/5a062e8d544a5c66ecfe0df456096ad12f6963eb M

[Issue 1] asm enter and leave bug

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1 klickverbot changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@klickverbot.at --- Comment #10 from kl

[Issue 747] undefined reference to `.LDASM1'

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=747 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 1057] Can't build on x86_64 without --disable-shared

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1057 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 1805] GDC does not implement the D calling convention

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1805 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 2297] on LinuxAmd64 some creal operations bring into scope a faulty version of powl

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2297 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 2088] GDC generates dozens of errors of the form "indirect jmp without `*'" when compiling anything at all

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2088 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 2213] unrecognizable insn are generated when cross-compiling

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2213 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 2001] multiple definition of _D6object13__va_list_tag6__initZ on X86-64

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2001 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 2053] PIC & ASM (EBX clobbering)

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2053 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 2688] struct assignment crashes on darwin ppc64

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2688 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw

[Issue 1230] std.math.poly asm segfaults

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1230 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 834] SegV in gdc during actest.d on Solaris

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=834 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 1126] multithreading breaks phobos exceptions on mingw/gdc .23

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1126 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 2584] GDC on ARM does not honor volatile

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2584 Alex R�nne Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Issue 2584] GDC on ARM does not honor volatile

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2584 Manu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||turkey...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Manu 2

[Issue 2584] GDC on ARM does not honor volatile

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2584 --- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw 2012-10-10 02:27:48 PDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Closing this since volatile is deprecated. > > Really? It's still important... What's the work-around? It is indeed important.

[Issue 2584] GDC on ARM does not honor volatile

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2584 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Iain Buclaw 2

[Issue 2584] GDC on ARM does not honor volatile

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2584 --- Comment #7 from Manu 2012-10-10 02:57:56 PDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Note: > > The D2-way of doing this is by using shared. Really? I thought it was nothing more than a type-safety marker. So shared actually makes a variable volati

[Issue 2584] GDC on ARM does not honor volatile

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2584 --- Comment #8 from Iain Buclaw 2012-10-10 03:32:04 PDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > Note: > > > > The D2-way of doing this is by using shared. > > Really? I thought it was nothing more than a type-safety marker

[Issue 9704] Destructor not called on function calls if postblit throws

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9704 Johannes Pfau changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d.gnu@puremagic.com,

[Issue 9704] Destructor not called on function calls if postblit throws

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9704 Maxim Fomin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ma...@maxim-fomin.ru --- Comment #2 from

[Issue 9704] Destructor not called on function calls if postblit throws

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9704 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||and...@erdani.com --- Comment

[Issue 9704] Destructor not called on function calls if postblit throws

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9704 monarchdo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||monarchdo...@gmail.com --- Com

[Issue 9704] Destructor not called on function calls if postblit throws

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9704 --- Comment #5 from Andrei Alexandrescu 2013-07-12 14:17:12 PDT --- Pasting the additional example here for reference: import std.stdio; struct S1 { this(int) { writeln("constructed"); } ~this() { writeln("destroyed"); } } struct

[Issue 1029] manual pages out-of-synch and/or missing

https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1029 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Issue 9704] Destructor not called on function calls if postblit throws

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9704 RazvanN changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|