On 22 December 2013 21:36, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 22 December 2013 00:06, Johannes Pfau wrote:
>> It seems there are still some issues with template9.d. It doesn't show
>> up in the test suite as it only runs one test for template9.d (why?) and
>> that test doesn't use the '-g' parameter. But wh
On 22 December 2013 21:36, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 22 December 2013 00:06, Johannes Pfau wrote:
>> It seems there are still some issues with template9.d. It doesn't show
>> up in the test suite as it only runs one test for template9.d (why?) and
>> that test doesn't use the '-g' parameter. But wh
On 22 December 2013 00:06, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> It seems there are still some issues with template9.d. It doesn't show
> up in the test suite as it only runs one test for template9.d (why?) and
> that test doesn't use the '-g' parameter. But when compiling template9.d
> with '-g':
>
> /opt/gdc/b
It seems there are still some issues with template9.d. It doesn't show
up in the test suite as it only runs one test for template9.d (why?) and
that test doesn't use the '-g' parameter. But when compiling template9.d
with '-g':
/opt/gdc/bin/gdc -g runnable/template9.d -o template9.exe
the compile