Re: Travis CI binutils is too old for new binary releases

2016-12-09 Thread Johannes Pfau via D.gnu
Am Fri, 9 Dec 2016 18:15:56 +0100 schrieb Johannes Pfau : > I just tested the new binaries with DMD/travis-CI and of course the > build failed immediately: > > https://travis-ci.org/dlang/dmd/jobs/182649710 > > It looks like this is a binutils bug: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=

Travis CI binutils is too old for new binary releases

2016-12-09 Thread Johannes Pfau via D.gnu
I just tested the new binaries with DMD/travis-CI and of course the build failed immediately: https://travis-ci.org/dlang/dmd/jobs/182649710 It looks like this is a binutils bug: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57017 So I rerun the test with the sysrooted toolchain (this toolchain i

Re: releases

2015-10-06 Thread Iain Buclaw via D.gnu
On 6 Oct 2015 11:50 pm, "Johannes Pfau via D.gnu" wrote: > > Am Tue, 6 Oct 2015 18:13:26 +0200 > schrieb "Iain Buclaw via D.gnu" : > > > > > I hope you are not backporting latest master to those branches > > too. ;-) > > > > I didn't have a look at the latest changes yet. Any reason why I > should

Re: releases

2015-10-06 Thread Johannes Pfau via D.gnu
Am Tue, 6 Oct 2015 18:13:26 +0200 schrieb "Iain Buclaw via D.gnu" : > > I hope you are not backporting latest master to those branches > too. ;-) > I didn't have a look at the latest changes yet. Any reason why I shouldn't backport these?

Re: releases

2015-10-06 Thread Iain Buclaw via D.gnu
On 6 October 2015 at 17:23, Johannes Pfau via D.gnu wrote: > Am Tue, 06 Oct 2015 12:52:23 + > schrieb John Colvin : > > > http://gdcproject.org/downloads are all with gcc 5.2 > > > > https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/releases/tag/v2.066.1_gcc5 > >

Re: releases

2015-10-06 Thread Johannes Pfau via D.gnu
Am Tue, 06 Oct 2015 12:52:23 + schrieb John Colvin : > http://gdcproject.org/downloads are all with gcc 5.2 > > https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/releases/tag/v2.066.1_gcc5 > is with gcc 5.1, as is the gdc-5 branch > The gcc.version file is the version tested by the C

releases

2015-10-06 Thread John Colvin via D.gnu
http://gdcproject.org/downloads are all with gcc 5.2 https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/releases/tag/v2.066.1_gcc5 is with gcc 5.1, as is the gdc-5 branch Is there a reason for this? If I want to package the latest "stable" gdc (must be from source), what should I work from?

Re: Any plans for gdc (D2) releases?

2011-03-18 Thread Nick Treleaven
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 18:23:00 +, dsimcha wrote: > I don't think it's quite stable enough yet. Progress is definitely > being made, but testing a few libs I wrote on it reveals several > showstopper bugs, which I've filed reports for. I doubt very many > decent-sized projects would compile and

Re: Any plans for gdc (D2) releases?

2011-03-17 Thread dsimcha
== Quote from Nick Treleaven (nos...@example.net)'s article > Hi, > Personally I haven't built GDC but I'm really pleased about the work done > to support D2, which appears up to date with DMD. I'm wondering are there > plans to make tarball releases or is GDC not s

Any plans for gdc (D2) releases?

2011-03-17 Thread Nick Treleaven
Hi, Personally I haven't built GDC but I'm really pleased about the work done to support D2, which appears up to date with DMD. I'm wondering are there plans to make tarball releases or is GDC not stable enough? I think if there were official releases it would be a step towards