On 13 February 2012 17:55, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> Am Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:36:22 +0100
> schrieb Johannes Pfau :
>
>> Yep, anything 'class' related won't work without object.di and
>> probably much more. But to make a app using those features link,
>> object_.d needs to be compiled in as well, and t
Am Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:36:22 +0100
schrieb Johannes Pfau :
> Yep, anything 'class' related won't work without object.di and
> probably much more. But to make a app using those features link,
> object_.d needs to be compiled in as well, and that pulls in some
> druntime dependencies (not too many),
Am Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:12:11 +
schrieb Iain Buclaw :
> On 10 February 2012 10:36, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> > When trying to add a --disable-libphobos switch to GCC I saw that
> > GCC already has code that makes it possible to --disable any target
> > library, although I think this is not docume
On 10 February 2012 10:36, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> When trying to add a --disable-libphobos switch to GCC I saw that GCC
> already has code that makes it possible to --disable any target
> library, although I think this is not documented in the configure --help
> output.
>
> Anyway, this means conf
When trying to add a --disable-libphobos switch to GCC I saw that GCC
already has code that makes it possible to --disable any target
library, although I think this is not documented in the configure --help
output.
Anyway, this means configure --disable-libphobos works fine and builds
a gdc withou
