Re: master branch broken

2014-03-31 Thread Brad Roberts
On 3/31/14, 10:06 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote: On 24 March 2014 07:34, Iain Buclaw wrote: On 23 March 2014 19:28, Iain Buclaw wrote: On 23 March 2014 09:31, Johannes Pfau wrote: Am Sat, 22 Mar 2014 14:50:22 -0700 schrieb Brad Roberts : On 3/22/14, 12:02 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote: On 22 March 2014

Re: master branch broken

2014-03-31 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 24 March 2014 07:34, Iain Buclaw wrote: > On 23 March 2014 19:28, Iain Buclaw wrote: >> On 23 March 2014 09:31, Johannes Pfau wrote: >>> Am Sat, 22 Mar 2014 14:50:22 -0700 >>> schrieb Brad Roberts : >>> On 3/22/14, 12:02 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote: > On 22 March 2014 18:20, Johannes Pfau

Re: master branch broken

2014-03-24 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 24 March 2014 08:27, Johannes Pfau wrote: > Am Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:58:01 -0700 > schrieb Brad Roberts : > >> I'm not at all concerned about space, and not sure why most >> developers would be. Assuming that the GDC changes were done on a >> non-master branch, and that master reflects the GCC m

Re: master branch broken

2014-03-24 Thread Johannes Pfau
Am Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:58:01 -0700 schrieb Brad Roberts : > I'm not at all concerned about space, and not sure why most > developers would be. Assuming that the GDC changes were done on a > non-master branch, and that master reflects the GCC master, then > seeing what the GDC changes are would be

Re: master branch broken

2014-03-24 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 23 March 2014 19:28, Iain Buclaw wrote: > On 23 March 2014 09:31, Johannes Pfau wrote: >> Am Sat, 22 Mar 2014 14:50:22 -0700 >> schrieb Brad Roberts : >> >>> On 3/22/14, 12:02 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote: >>> > On 22 March 2014 18:20, Johannes Pfau wrote: >>> >> See >>> >> https://d.puremagic.com/t

Re: master branch broken

2014-03-23 Thread Brad Roberts
On 3/23/14, 3:44 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote: On 23 March 2014 21:58, Brad Roberts wrote: I'm not at all concerned about space, and not sure why most developers would be. Assuming that the GDC changes were done on a non-master branch, and that master reflects the GCC master, then seeing what the GDC

Re: master branch broken

2014-03-23 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 23 March 2014 21:58, Brad Roberts wrote: > I'm not at all concerned about space, and not sure why most developers would > be. Assuming that the GDC changes were done on a non-master branch, and > that master reflects the GCC master, then seeing what the GDC changes are > would be a typical git

Re: master branch broken

2014-03-23 Thread Brad Roberts
I'm not at all concerned about space, and not sure why most developers would be. Assuming that the GDC changes were done on a non-master branch, and that master reflects the GCC master, then seeing what the GDC changes are would be a typical git operation: git diff master..GDC. But I can deal

Re: master branch broken

2014-03-23 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 23 March 2014 09:31, Johannes Pfau wrote: > Am Sat, 22 Mar 2014 14:50:22 -0700 > schrieb Brad Roberts : > >> On 3/22/14, 12:02 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote: >> > On 22 March 2014 18:20, Johannes Pfau wrote: >> >> See >> >> https://d.puremagic.com/test-results/test_data.ghtml?projectid=2&runid=62582&l

Re: master branch broken

2014-03-23 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 23 March 2014 09:31, Johannes Pfau wrote: > Am Sat, 22 Mar 2014 14:50:22 -0700 > schrieb Brad Roberts : > >> On 3/22/14, 12:02 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote: >> > On 22 March 2014 18:20, Johannes Pfau wrote: >> >> See >> >> https://d.puremagic.com/test-results/test_data.ghtml?projectid=2&runid=62582&l

Re: master branch broken

2014-03-23 Thread Johannes Pfau
Am Sat, 22 Mar 2014 14:50:22 -0700 schrieb Brad Roberts : > On 3/22/14, 12:02 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote: > > On 22 March 2014 18:20, Johannes Pfau wrote: > >> See > >> https://d.puremagic.com/test-results/test_data.ghtml?projectid=2&runid=62582&logid=13 > >> > >> (Didn't see this in my local tests, i

Re: master branch broken

2014-03-22 Thread Brad Roberts
On 3/22/14, 12:02 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote: On 22 March 2014 18:20, Johannes Pfau wrote: See https://d.puremagic.com/test-results/test_data.ghtml?projectid=2&runid=62582&logid=13 (Didn't see this in my local tests, it probably needs a complete gdc rebuild to happen) Hmm, didn't see that either.

Re: master branch broken

2014-03-22 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 22 March 2014 18:20, Johannes Pfau wrote: > See > https://d.puremagic.com/test-results/test_data.ghtml?projectid=2&runid=62582&logid=13 > > (Didn't see this in my local tests, it probably needs a complete gdc > rebuild to happen) Hmm, didn't see that either.

master branch broken

2014-03-22 Thread Johannes Pfau
See https://d.puremagic.com/test-results/test_data.ghtml?projectid=2&runid=62582&logid=13 (Didn't see this in my local tests, it probably needs a complete gdc rebuild to happen)