On Monday, 11 March 2013 at 11:39:19 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 11 March 2013 08:36, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On Mar 10, 2013 11:41 PM, "John Colvin"
wrote:
>
> On Friday, 8 March 2013 at 18:45:12 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> On 8 March 2013 18:37, John Colvin
>>
wrote:
>>
>>> Is there any w
On 11 March 2013 08:36, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
> On Mar 10, 2013 11:41 PM, "John Colvin"
> wrote:
> >
> > On Friday, 8 March 2013 at 18:45:12 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> >>
> >> On 8 March 2013 18:37, John Colvin
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Is there any way of knowing the correct snapshot to compile with a
On Mar 10, 2013 11:41 PM, "John Colvin"
wrote:
>
> On Friday, 8 March 2013 at 18:45:12 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> On 8 March 2013 18:37, John Colvin
wrote:
>>
>>> Is there any way of knowing the correct snapshot to compile with at any
>>> given time? It's a pretty lengthy trial and error proce
On Friday, 8 March 2013 at 18:45:12 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 8 March 2013 18:37, John Colvin
wrote:
Is there any way of knowing the correct snapshot to compile
with at any
given time? It's a pretty lengthy trial and error process to
find out
I normally update my gcc snapshot once e
On 03/08/2013 07:37 PM, John Colvin wrote:
Is there any way of knowing the correct snapshot to compile with at any given
time? It's a pretty lengthy trial and error process to find out
Personally I just use whatever is the current gcc-snapshot package in
Ubuntu/Debian, which has always wor
On 8 March 2013 18:37, John Colvin wrote:
> Is there any way of knowing the correct snapshot to compile with at any
> given time? It's a pretty lengthy trial and error process to find out
>
I normally update my gcc snapshot once every fortnight. If there's any
compilation issues let me know
Is there any way of knowing the correct snapshot to compile with
at any given time? It's a pretty lengthy trial and error process
to find out