On 2/6/2011 2:58 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> == Quote from Brad Roberts (bra...@puremagic.com)'s article
>> I'd be happy to have gcc finding vectorization opportunities, but there's no
> need to add this sort of thing to the
>> language. This already has a hook to call a library function:
>> float[4]
On 02/06/2011 02:58 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> == Quote from Brad Roberts (bra...@puremagic.com)'s article
>> I'd be happy to have gcc finding vectorization opportunities, but there's no
> need to add this sort of thing to the
>> language. This already has a hook to call a library function:
>> float
== Quote from Brad Roberts (bra...@puremagic.com)'s article
> I'd be happy to have gcc finding vectorization opportunities, but there's no
need to add this sort of thing to the
> language. This already has a hook to call a library function:
> float[4] a = [1,2,3,4], b = [5,6,7,8], c;
> c[] = a[] +
On 2/6/2011 4:15 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> == Quote from Mike Farnsworth (mike.farnswo...@gmail.com)'s article
>> On 02/01/2011 10:38 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>> I haven't given it much thought on how internal representation could be,
>>> but I'd
>>> lean on using unions in D code for usage in the l
== Quote from Iain Buclaw (ibuc...@ubuntu.com)'s article
> == Quote from Mike Farnsworth (mike.farnswo...@gmail.com)'s article
> > On 02/01/2011 10:38 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> > > I haven't given it much thought on how internal representation could be,
> > > but I'd
> > > lean on using unions in D
== Quote from Mike Farnsworth (mike.farnswo...@gmail.com)'s article
> On 02/01/2011 10:38 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> > I haven't given it much thought on how internal representation could be,
> > but I'd
> > lean on using unions in D code for usage in the language. As its probably
> > most
> > port
On 2011-02-06 07:24, Mike Farnsworth wrote:
On 02/01/2011 10:38 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
I haven't given it much thought on how internal representation could be, but I'd
lean on using unions in D code for usage in the language. As its probably most
portable.
For example, one of the older 'hello v
On 02/01/2011 10:38 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> I haven't given it much thought on how internal representation could be, but
> I'd
> lean on using unions in D code for usage in the language. As its probably most
> portable.
>
> For example, one of the older 'hello vectors' I know of:
>
> import std
Iain Buclaw Wrote:
> == Quote from Jerry Quinn (jlqu...@optonline.net)'s article
> > Iain Buclaw Wrote:
> > > == Quote from Mike Farnsworth (mike.farnswo...@gmail.com)'s article
> > > > I built gdc from tip on Fedora 13 (x86-64) and started playing around
> > > > with creating a vector struct (x,y
== Quote from Mike Farnsworth (mike.farnswo...@gmail.com)'s article
> Iain Buclaw Wrote:
> > Interestingly enough, this particular example actually ICEs the compiler. It
> > appears that while *explicit* casting is done in the code, DMDFE actually
> > *ignores* this, which is terrible on DMD's part
== Quote from Jerry Quinn (jlqu...@optonline.net)'s article
> Iain Buclaw Wrote:
> > == Quote from Mike Farnsworth (mike.farnswo...@gmail.com)'s article
> > > I built gdc from tip on Fedora 13 (x86-64) and started playing around
> > > with creating a vector struct (x,y,z,w) to see what kind of opti
Iain Buclaw Wrote:
> == Quote from Mike Farnsworth (mike.farnswo...@gmail.com)'s article
> > I built gdc from tip on Fedora 13 (x86-64) and started playing around
> > with creating a vector struct (x,y,z,w) to see what kind of optimization
> > the code generator did with it. It was able to partia
Daniel Gibson Wrote:
> I'm not sure if that'll help at all, but you may try something like
> alias float[4] vec4; // or whatever type you're using
> /Maybe/ SSE optimizations work better on arrays than on structs.
> Of course, such a type isn't as handy because it'll be vec4[0] instead
> of vec4.x
Iain Buclaw Wrote:
> == Quote from Mike Farnsworth (mike.farnswo...@gmail.com)'s article
> > I built gdc from tip on Fedora 13 (x86-64) and started playing around
> > with creating a vector struct (x,y,z,w) to see what kind of optimization
> > the code generator did with it. It was able to partia
== Quote from Mike Farnsworth (mike.farnswo...@gmail.com)'s article
> I built gdc from tip on Fedora 13 (x86-64) and started playing around
> with creating a vector struct (x,y,z,w) to see what kind of optimization
> the code generator did with it. It was able to partially drop into SSE
> register
Am 01.02.2011 09:10, schrieb Mike Farnsworth:
I built gdc from tip on Fedora 13 (x86-64) and started playing around
with creating a vector struct (x,y,z,w) to see what kind of optimization
the code generator did with it. It was able to partially drop into SSE
registers and instructions, but not
I built gdc from tip on Fedora 13 (x86-64) and started playing around
with creating a vector struct (x,y,z,w) to see what kind of optimization
the code generator did with it. It was able to partially drop into SSE
registers and instructions, but not as well as I had hoped from writing
"regular" D
17 matches
Mail list logo
