On Sunday, 15 January 2012 at 22:34:28 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
* GDC's default calling convention has now been switched back
to that of the default for the target platform. The D_InlineAsm
family of version identifiers are now turned off by default as
we no longer pretend to follow DMD's callin
On Monday, 16 January 2012 at 14:42:08 UTC, Artur Skawina wrote:
As you still cannot easily call D code from C, without the
equivalent of
"extern(D)", why not default to a more sane calling
conventions, such as
regparm on 32-bit x86?
The requirement for this kind of compatibility was simply a
On 17 January 2012 06:27, Daniel Green wrote:
> On 1/16/2012 3:34 PM, Manu wrote:
>
>> I went through that stuff you submitted the patch for, then I also ran
>> into a conflict between linux sockets and windows sockets, and that's as
>> far as I got when I stopped.
>>
>
> The only posix file that
On 1/16/2012 3:34 PM, Manu wrote:
I went through that stuff you submitted the patch for, then I also ran
into a conflict between linux sockets and windows sockets, and that's as
far as I got when I stopped.
The only posix file that gave me trouble was `core/sys/posix/sys/un.d`.
GDC turns it i
On 16 January 2012 23:08, Artur Skawina wrote:
> On 01/16/12 21:49, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> On 16 January 2012 19:14, Artur Skawina wrote:
>>> On 01/16/12 17:43, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 16 January 2012 14:41, Artur Skawina wrote:
> On 01/15/12 23:34, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> * Merged in th
On 01/16/12 21:49, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 16 January 2012 19:14, Artur Skawina wrote:
>> On 01/16/12 17:43, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>> On 16 January 2012 14:41, Artur Skawina wrote:
On 01/15/12 23:34, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> * Merged in the work Walter has done for __vector type support. Ther
On 16 January 2012 19:14, Artur Skawina wrote:
> On 01/16/12 17:43, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> On 16 January 2012 14:41, Artur Skawina wrote:
>>> On 01/15/12 23:34, Iain Buclaw wrote:
* Merged in the work Walter has done for __vector type support. There are
now newly available GCC builtins
On 16 January 2012 18:56, Daniel Green wrote:
> On 1/16/2012 4:03 AM, Manu wrote:
>
>> I had creeping problems building phobos (MinGW) last night stemming from
>> D_InlineAsm being removed. Didn't manage to get it working in the end,
>> gave up and went to bed :)
>>
>
> https://bitbucket.org/gosh
If you want cross-module inlining, compile all sources in one command.
gdc file1.d file2.d -o myapp
So 'gdc -c file1.d' won't inline small functions from file2? Why?
On 1/16/2012 1:42 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Cool. Do you have anything in your MinGW patch queue that might be
worth merging in?
Maybe. I'm merging some of the trivial changes now.
In addition there is TLS support but that requires patches to the
runtime, bintutils and GCC. Support for C99 st
On 01/16/12 17:43, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 16 January 2012 14:41, Artur Skawina wrote:
>> On 01/15/12 23:34, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>> * Merged in the work Walter has done for __vector type support. There are
>>> now newly available GCC builtins for vector operations via gcc.builtins
>>> module.
>
On 16 January 2012 16:56, Daniel Green wrote:
> On 1/16/2012 4:03 AM, Manu wrote:
>>
>> I had creeping problems building phobos (MinGW) last night stemming from
>> D_InlineAsm being removed. Didn't manage to get it working in the end,
>> gave up and went to bed :)
>
>
> https://bitbucket.org/gosha
On 1/16/2012 4:03 AM, Manu wrote:
I had creeping problems building phobos (MinGW) last night stemming from
D_InlineAsm being removed. Didn't manage to get it working in the end,
gave up and went to bed :)
https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/changeset/dc87c7212d70
Some of the stack functions need
On 16 January 2012 14:41, Artur Skawina wrote:
> On 01/15/12 23:34, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> * Merged in the work Walter has done for __vector type support. There are
>> now newly available GCC builtins for vector operations via gcc.builtins
>> module.
>
> Allowing !=128 bits wide types would be j
On 16 January 2012 16:41, Artur Skawina wrote:
> On 01/15/12 23:34, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> > * Merged in the work Walter has done for __vector type support. There
> are now newly available GCC builtins for vector operations via gcc.builtins
> module.
>
> Allowing !=128 bits wide types would be jus
On 01/15/12 23:34, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> * Merged in the work Walter has done for __vector type support. There are
> now newly available GCC builtins for vector operations via gcc.builtins
> module.
Allowing !=128 bits wide types would be just a matter of removing the frontend
restrictions, righ
On 16 January 2012 09:03, Manu wrote:
> I had creeping problems building phobos (MinGW) last night stemming
> from D_InlineAsm being removed. Didn't manage to get it working in the end,
> gave up and went to bed :)
>
>
Please raise bug report with build logs, thanks.
--
Iain Buclaw
*(p < e ?
I had creeping problems building phobos (MinGW) last night stemming from
D_InlineAsm being removed. Didn't manage to get it working in the end, gave
up and went to bed :)
On 16 January 2012 00:34, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> I've done a recent blitz of changes through the GDC codebase, some which
> ch
I've done a recent blitz of changes through the GDC codebase,
some which change the way code is generated in a way which
affects the current ABI.
* Dropped support for GCC 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4
* Merged in the work Walter has done for __vector type support.
There are now newly available GCC built
19 matches
Mail list logo
