On Friday, 7 June 2013 at 16:07:46 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 7 June 2013 16:28, eles wrote:
On Friday, 7 June 2013 at 14:07:27 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 7 June 2013 13:26, eles wrote:
So you must remove these by hand. If it doesn't give that
error to
you, let me know. =)
Shouldn't b
On 7 June 2013 16:28, eles wrote:
> On Friday, 7 June 2013 at 14:07:27 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> On 7 June 2013 13:26, eles wrote:
>>
>> The gcc/d folder is symlinked to the gdc sources, so any updates in
>> gdc will reflect in the gcc/d tree.
>
>
> I think there is a confusion. The code that
On Friday, 7 June 2013 at 14:07:27 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 7 June 2013 13:26, eles wrote:
The gcc/d folder is symlinked to the gdc sources, so any
updates in
gdc will reflect in the gcc/d tree.
I think there is a confusion. The code that I quoted used to
workk with gcc-4.8 (4.8.0) sourc
On 7 June 2013 13:26, eles wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What is the purpose of this code in setup-gcc.sh?
>
> # 1. Remove d sources from d_gccsrc if already exist
> test -h "$d_gccsrc/gcc/d" && rm "$d_gccsrc/gcc/d"
> test -d "$d_gccsrc/libphobos" && rm -r "$d_gccsrc/libphobos"
> if test -e "$d_gccsrc/gcc/
On 06/07/2013 04:05 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> You should run setup-gcc.sh with --update. That skips applying the
> patches (again)
Cool, thanks. :-)
On 7 June 2013 13:55, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
> Slightly different question about setup-gcc.sh.
>
> If you run it on the gcc-4.8.1 sources, having run it previously, you get the
> following error message:
>
> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
>
> ... w
Slightly different question about setup-gcc.sh.
If you run it on the gcc-4.8.1 sources, having run it previously, you get the
following error message:
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
... what's the correct response here? :-)
