On Oct 2, 2013 1:50 AM, "Brad Roberts" wrote:
>
> On 10/1/13 9:43 AM, Brad Roberts wrote:
>>
>> On 10/1/13 3:00 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> All that I can think of is that flex isn't installed on the autotester
box?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> --
>>> Iain Buclaw
>>>
>>> *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x
On 10/1/13 9:43 AM, Brad Roberts wrote:
On 10/1/13 3:00 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
All that I can think of is that flex isn't installed on the autotester box?
Regards
--
Iain Buclaw
*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
Indeed it wasn't. However, shouldn't:
a) the 4.8.1 build have failed for
On 10/1/13 3:00 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
All that I can think of is that flex isn't installed on the autotester box?
Regards
--
Iain Buclaw
*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
Indeed it wasn't. However, shouldn't:
a) the 4.8.1 build have failed for the same reason?
b) a configure check ha
On Oct 1, 2013 8:08 AM, "Brad Roberts" wrote:
>
> On 9/30/13 8:59 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> On 1 October 2013 04:54, Brad Roberts wrote:
>>>
>>> On 9/17/13 12:41 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 17 September 2013 01:33, Brad Roberts wrote:
>
>
> It looks like the auto-test
On 9/30/13 8:59 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 1 October 2013 04:54, Brad Roberts wrote:
On 9/17/13 12:41 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 17 September 2013 01:33, Brad Roberts wrote:
It looks like the auto-tester for gdc has been failing for quite a while
in
the phobos math.d tests. Anyone looking a
On 1 October 2013 04:54, Brad Roberts wrote:
> On 9/17/13 12:41 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> On 17 September 2013 01:33, Brad Roberts wrote:
>>>
>>> It looks like the auto-tester for gdc has been failing for quite a while
>>> in
>>> the phobos math.d tests. Anyone looking at those results?
>>>
>
On 9/17/13 12:41 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 17 September 2013 01:33, Brad Roberts wrote:
It looks like the auto-tester for gdc has been failing for quite a while in
the phobos math.d tests. Anyone looking at those results?
http;//d.puremagic.com/test-results/?projectid=2
http://d.puremagic.com
On 17 September 2013 01:33, Brad Roberts wrote:
> It looks like the auto-tester for gdc has been failing for quite a while in
> the phobos math.d tests. Anyone looking at those results?
>
> http;//d.puremagic.com/test-results/?projectid=2
> http://d.puremagic.com/test-results/platform-history.ght
