On Tuesday, 13 January 2015 at 10:49:43 UTC, Iain Buclaw via
D.gnu wrote:
I can assist, though timing is a problem as of late. I'll have
a list
of jobs to catch-up on my side before my attention becomes
undivided.
Iain.
Thanks, Iain. I patiently await any assistance you can provide.
On 13 January 2015 at 10:17, Mike via D.gnu wrote:
> On Saturday, 11 October 2014 at 08:15:55 UTC, Iain Buclaw via D.gnu wrote:
>
>>> So, I'm wondering if the compiler maintainers would entertain a change to
>>> the GDC that moved the runtime declarations (i.e. _d_newclass,
>>> _d_{whatever}) to a
On Saturday, 11 October 2014 at 08:15:55 UTC, Iain Buclaw via
D.gnu wrote:
So, I'm wondering if the compiler maintainers would entertain
a change to
the GDC that moved the runtime declarations (i.e. _d_newclass,
_d_{whatever}) to a .di file in druntime.
* Compilation would automatically import
On Sunday, 12 October 2014 at 00:12:47 UTC, Mike wrote:
Sounds like you you and I are after pretty much the same thing.
I'm not really trying to build anything, like a kernel, just
yet.
Rather, I'm just trying to get a decent runtime built so we
can all have a reasonably polished language to
On Saturday, 11 October 2014 at 17:37:22 UTC, Kevin Lamonte wrote:
On Saturday, 11 October 2014 at 06:59:33 UTC, Mike wrote:
Hello,
In my continued, though stalled, effort to try and make
minimal runtime for embedded systems, I've tried to find a way
for users to know at compile-time if a fea
Am Sat, 11 Oct 2014 17:37:20 +
schrieb "Kevin Lamonte" :
> On Saturday, 11 October 2014 at 06:59:33 UTC, Mike wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > In my continued, though stalled, effort to try and make minimal
> > runtime for embedded systems, I've tried to find a way for
> > users to know at compile-
On Saturday, 11 October 2014 at 06:59:33 UTC, Mike wrote:
Hello,
In my continued, though stalled, effort to try and make minimal
runtime for embedded systems, I've tried to find a way for
users to know at compile-time if a feature of the runtime is
supported or not, and more importantly, if t
On 11 October 2014 07:59, Mike via D.gnu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In my continued, though stalled, effort to try and make minimal runtime for
> embedded systems, I've tried to find a way for users to know at compile-time
> if a feature of the runtime is supported or not, and more importantly, if
> they
