Am Mon, 05 Nov 2012 16:30:58 +0100
schrieb Joseph Rushton Wakeling :
> Hello all,
>
> Having just successfully build GDC 4.7, I noticed that it still
> contains only frontend/phobos 2.059.
>
> Is there any chance of seeing 2.060 merged in? One of the main
> reasons for building from source was
Am Mon, 05 Nov 2012 20:53:57 +0100
schrieb Joseph Rushton Wakeling :
> On 11/05/2012 08:29 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> > Once pulled in, how do I go about running the unittests on all code
> > (DFE, druntime, phobos) as part of the build process? (Something
> > worth adding to GDC wiki p
On 11/05/2012 08:29 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
Once pulled in, how do I go about running the unittests on all code (DFE,
druntime, phobos) as part of the build process? (Something worth adding to GDC
wiki perhaps?)
Whoops, there I go jumping ahead of myself:
http://www.gdcproject.org/
On 5 November 2012 19:29, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
> On 11/05/2012 05:35 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> You could try taking the patch from the 2.060 merge on trunk and
>> applying it... other than that I don't plan on making any major
>> changes to the 4.7 branch other than bug fixing (someon
On 11/05/2012 05:35 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
You could try taking the patch from the 2.060 merge on trunk and
applying it... other than that I don't plan on making any major
changes to the 4.7 branch other than bug fixing (someone can feel free
to send backpatches from 2.060 if there's any big bloc
On 11/05/2012 07:15 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 5 November 2012 18:04, H. S. Teoh wrote:
If we somehow manage to get 2.060 working for the 4.7 branch, would you
take a pull request? ;-)
I know you're focusing on 4.8, but I'm still unable to get it to build
correctly, whereas the 4.7 branch works
On 5 November 2012 18:04, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 05:40:36PM +, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> On 5 November 2012 16:10, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
>> wrote:
> [...]
>> > Is there a particular reason not to allow the frontend, druntime and
>> > phobos to be git submodules which could
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 05:40:36PM +, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 5 November 2012 16:10, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
> wrote:
[...]
> > Is there a particular reason not to allow the frontend, druntime and
> > phobos to be git submodules which could be kept up to date with
> > upstream in a more 'live'
On 5 November 2012 16:10, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
> On 11/05/2012 05:53 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> Ah, now I remember why I hated the 2.060 merge... so many changes ... :o)
>
>
> Sorry to bring back the trauma :-P
>
> Is there a particular reason not to allow the frontend, druntime and ph
On 11/05/2012 05:53 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Ah, now I remember why I hated the 2.060 merge... so many changes ... :o)
Sorry to bring back the trauma :-P
Is there a particular reason not to allow the frontend, druntime and phobos to
be git submodules which could be kept up to date with upstream
On 5 November 2012 15:46, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
> On 11/05/2012 05:35 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> You could try taking the patch from the 2.060 merge on trunk and
>> applying it... other than that I don't plan on making any major
>> changes to the 4.7 branch other than bug fixing (someon
On 11/05/2012 05:35 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
You could try taking the patch from the 2.060 merge on trunk and
applying it... other than that I don't plan on making any major
changes to the 4.7 branch other than bug fixing (someone can feel free
to send backpatches from 2.060 if there's any big bloc
On 5 November 2012 15:30, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Having just successfully build GDC 4.7, I noticed that it still contains
> only frontend/phobos 2.059.
>
> Is there any chance of seeing 2.060 merged in? One of the main reasons for
> building from source was to gain certai
13 matches
Mail list logo
