On Tuesday, 26 March 2013 at 19:20:43 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling wrote:
On 03/26/2013 07:13 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
That's good news! I've been unable to get 4.8 to build in my
Debian
system (probably due to some system- or configuration-specific
breakages
somewhere... Debian multiarch isn't pl
On 03/26/2013 07:13 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> That's good news! I've been unable to get 4.8 to build in my Debian
> system (probably due to some system- or configuration-specific breakages
> somewhere... Debian multiarch isn't playing nice with GCC's build
> scripts). Having the latest frontend avail
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 07:06:30PM +0100, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> Am Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:36:16 +
> schrieb Iain Buclaw :
>
> > >
> > >
> > Guaranteed is not the right word, but future releases of the frontend
> > will be present only on 4.9. Though, people are free to backport to
> > 4.8 or 4.
Am Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:36:16 +
schrieb Iain Buclaw :
> >
> >
> Guaranteed is not the right word, but future releases of the frontend
> will be present only on 4.9. Though, people are free to backport to
> 4.8 or 4.7, as Johannes has done in the past.
FYI I'll also try to continue updating th
On 26 March 2013 16:09, Joseph Rushton Wakeling <
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> wrote:
> On 03/26/2013 03:44 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> > This is why there are gdc-4.7, gdc-4.8 branches. They are there to be
> > guaranteed to work with those gcc releases. There won't be any support
> for
> > multi
On 03/26/2013 03:44 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> This is why there are gdc-4.7, gdc-4.8 branches. They are there to be
> guaranteed to work with those gcc releases. There won't be any support for
> multiple gcc versions in one source.
I think you've misunderstood me (although I don't think I express
On 26 March 2013 12:37, Joseph Rushton Wakeling <
joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> wrote:
> On 03/23/2013 01:13 PM, Manu wrote:
> > Will switching to 4.9 make it harder to support all the 4.8 (and below)
> cross
> > compilers out there? Like the console toolchains.
>
> Also ... how will that affect t
On 03/23/2013 01:13 PM, Manu wrote:
> Will switching to 4.9 make it harder to support all the 4.8 (and below) cross
> compilers out there? Like the console toolchains.
Also ... how will that affect the ability to compile on Ubuntu using
gcc-snapshot? Working on alpha/beta 13.04 that package has c
Am Sat, 23 Mar 2013 22:13:24 +1000
schrieb Manu :
> Hooray! Welcome Johannes!
> That guy rocks my world! :P
Thanks :-)
Iain and Daniel are doing all the hard work though.
> Will switching to 4.9 make it harder to support all the 4.8 (and
> below) cross compilers out there? Like the console toolc
On Mar 24, 2013 1:00 AM, "Moritz Maxeiner" wrote:
>
> On Saturday, 23 March 2013 at 10:33:16 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes this weekend:
>>
>> - New gdc-4.8 branch has been created for stable updates on D-2.062 and
gcc-4.8.x
>> https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/tree/gd
On Saturday, 23 March 2013 at 10:33:16 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Hi all,
Changes this weekend:
- New gdc-4.8 branch has been created for stable updates on
D-2.062 and gcc-4.8.x
https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/tree/gdc-4.8
- The main development trunk will switch to gcc-4.9 development
On Saturday, 23 March 2013 at 12:45:10 UTC, Manu wrote:
Hooray! Welcome Johannes!
That guy rocks my world! :P
Will switching to 4.9 make it harder to support all the 4.8
(and below)
cross compilers out there? Like the console toolchains.
The main cross compiler scripts out there only suppor
Hooray! Welcome Johannes!
That guy rocks my world! :P
Will switching to 4.9 make it harder to support all the 4.8 (and below)
cross compilers out there? Like the console toolchains.
On 23 March 2013 20:33, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes this weekend:
>
> - New gdc-4.8 branch has been
13 matches
Mail list logo