Re: 64-bit DLLs

2012-01-27 Thread Daniel Green
All tests pass. However, I see your problem. In plaindll.d: version(GNU){ // Workaround for linker error void* _tlsstart; // First symbol of the TLS section void* _tlsend; //int _tls_callbacks_a; // Workaround for GDC/MinGW linker error } _tlsstart is the first symbol o

Re: 64-bit DLLs

2012-01-27 Thread S�nke Ludwig
== Auszug aus Daniel Green (ven...@gmail.com)'s Artikel > On 1/26/2012 11:01 AM, Sönke Ludwig wrote: > > Is TLS support and/or a workaround for those crashes something that's on > > the radar? > That release had a few issues with generating 64-bit TLS code. Those > issues have been fixed but I ha

Re: 64-bit DLLs

2012-01-27 Thread Sönke Ludwig
Am 27.01.2012 01:32, schrieb Daniel Green: > On 1/26/2012 11:01 AM, Sönke Ludwig wrote: >> Is TLS support and/or a workaround for those crashes something that's on >> the radar? > That release had a few issues with generating 64-bit TLS code. Those > issues have been fixed but I haven't uploaded

Re: 64-bit DLLs

2012-01-26 Thread Daniel Green
On 1/26/2012 11:01 AM, Sönke Ludwig wrote: Is TLS support and/or a workaround for those crashes something that's on the radar? That release had a few issues with generating 64-bit TLS code. Those issues have been fixed but I haven't uploaded a new binary. The new compiler can pass most of th

Re: 64-bit DLLs

2012-01-26 Thread Trass3r
Is TLS support and/or a workaround for those crashes something that's on the radar? It's a known issue and being worked on I think.