GDC sources can't compile the code. :)
And it's sometimes harder to build GDC from sources, i don't want
to have that headache.
Sorry, but i meant binary releases, of course, for windows, for
example.
On 07/09/2013 12:29 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> As per documentation:
>
> The D language is under development as of this writing; see {current
> language reference}. At present the current major version of D is
> 2.0, and
> there is no way to describe the language supported by GCC in terms of
> a sp
On 5 July 2013 22:32, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> Am Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:45:42 +0200
> schrieb "Iain Buclaw" :
>
>> Unless Vladimir possibly gives us access to dlang's wiki to post
>> the documentation content there. I've opened up a new wiki page
&
On 9 July 2013 10:40, Temtaime wrote:
> Why there is no GDC releases? It prevents many from using GDC.
No it doesn't, stop lying. (Where's my sartalic formatting when I need it)
As per documentation:
The D language is under development as of this writing; see {current
language reference}. At
Why there is no GDC releases? It prevents many from using GDC.
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 11:32:59PM +0200, Johannes Pfau wrote:
[...]
> I moved the main page contents to
> http://wiki.dlang.org/GDC
>
> So should we use wiki.dlang.org as our main wiki?
I think that's a good idea. Consolidating everything in the main wiki
will make information easier for newbies
Am Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:45:42 +0200
schrieb "Iain Buclaw" :
> Unless Vladimir possibly gives us access to dlang's wiki to post
> the documentation content there. I've opened up a new wiki page
> for people to contribute to.
>
> http://wiki.gdcproject.org
Am Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:55:53 +0100
schrieb Iain Buclaw :
> On 27 June 2013 11:37, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
> wrote:
> > On 06/26/2013 05:45 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> >> Unless Vladimir possibly gives us access to dlang's wiki to post
> >> the documentation conten
On 06/27/2013 01:55 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> I still don't know what the plans are... I just don't have time to set
> anything in stone at the moment.
Well, FWIW I think a wiki is a better option, it's just much easier to edit than
Ddoc.
On 27 June 2013 11:37, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
> On 06/26/2013 05:45 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> Unless Vladimir possibly gives us access to dlang's wiki to post the
>> documentation content there. I've opened up a new wiki page for people to
>> contribute to
On 06/26/2013 05:45 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> Unless Vladimir possibly gives us access to dlang's wiki to post the
> documentation content there. I've opened up a new wiki page for people to
> contribute to.
Hang on, I'm confused. I thought the plan was to move to Ddoc h
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 06:04:54PM +0200, Dicebot wrote:
> On Wednesday, 26 June 2013 at 15:45:44 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> >Unless Vladimir possibly gives us access to dlang's wiki to post
> >the documentation content there. I've opened up a new wiki page
>
On Wednesday, 26 June 2013 at 15:45:44 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Unless Vladimir possibly gives us access to dlang's wiki to
post the documentation content there. I've opened up a new
wiki page for people to contribute to.
http://wiki.gdcproject.org
Thanks
Iain.
Erm, but wiki.dl
Unless Vladimir possibly gives us access to dlang's wiki to post
the documentation content there. I've opened up a new wiki page
for people to contribute to.
http://wiki.gdcproject.org
Thanks
Iain.
15 matches
Mail list logo
