Am Mon, 05 Nov 2012 16:30:58 +0100
schrieb Joseph Rushton Wakeling :
> Hello all,
>
> Having just successfully build GDC 4.7, I noticed that it still
> contains only frontend/phobos 2.059.
>
> Is there any chance of seeing 2.060 merged in? One of the main
> reasons for building from source was
Am Mon, 05 Nov 2012 20:53:57 +0100
schrieb Joseph Rushton Wakeling :
> On 11/05/2012 08:29 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> > Once pulled in, how do I go about running the unittests on all code
> > (DFE, druntime, phobos) as part of the build process? (Something
> > worth adding to GDC wiki p
On 11/05/2012 08:29 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
Once pulled in, how do I go about running the unittests on all code (DFE,
druntime, phobos) as part of the build process? (Something worth adding to GDC
wiki perhaps?)
Whoops, there I go jumping ahead of myself:
http://www.gdcproject.org/
On 5 November 2012 19:29, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
> On 11/05/2012 05:35 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> You could try taking the patch from the 2.060 merge on trunk and
>> applying it... other than that I don't plan on making any major
>> changes to the 4.7 branch other than bug fixing (someon
On 11/05/2012 05:35 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
You could try taking the patch from the 2.060 merge on trunk and
applying it... other than that I don't plan on making any major
changes to the 4.7 branch other than bug fixing (someone can feel free
to send backpatches from 2.060 if there's any big bloc
On 11/05/2012 07:15 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 5 November 2012 18:04, H. S. Teoh wrote:
If we somehow manage to get 2.060 working for the 4.7 branch, would you
take a pull request? ;-)
I know you're focusing on 4.8, but I'm still unable to get it to build
correctly, whereas the 4.7 branch works
On 5 November 2012 18:04, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 05:40:36PM +, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> On 5 November 2012 16:10, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
>> wrote:
> [...]
>> > Is there a particular reason not to allow the frontend, druntime and
>> > phobos to be git submodules which could
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 05:40:36PM +, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 5 November 2012 16:10, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
> wrote:
[...]
> > Is there a particular reason not to allow the frontend, druntime and
> > phobos to be git submodules which could be kept up to date with
> > upstream in a more 'live'
On 5 November 2012 16:10, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
> On 11/05/2012 05:53 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> Ah, now I remember why I hated the 2.060 merge... so many changes ... :o)
>
>
> Sorry to bring back the trauma :-P
>
> Is there a particular reason not to allow the frontend, druntime and ph
On 11/05/2012 05:53 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Ah, now I remember why I hated the 2.060 merge... so many changes ... :o)
Sorry to bring back the trauma :-P
Is there a particular reason not to allow the frontend, druntime and phobos to
be git submodules which could be kept up to date with upstream
On 5 November 2012 15:46, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
> On 11/05/2012 05:35 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> You could try taking the patch from the 2.060 merge on trunk and
>> applying it... other than that I don't plan on making any major
>> changes to the 4.7 branch other than bug fixing (someon
On 11/05/2012 05:35 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
You could try taking the patch from the 2.060 merge on trunk and
applying it... other than that I don't plan on making any major
changes to the 4.7 branch other than bug fixing (someone can feel free
to send backpatches from 2.060 if there's any big bloc
On 5 November 2012 15:30, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Having just successfully build GDC 4.7, I noticed that it still contains
> only frontend/phobos 2.059.
>
> Is there any chance of seeing 2.060 merged in? One of the main reasons for
> building from source was to gain certai
Hello all,
Having just successfully build GDC 4.7, I noticed that it still contains only
frontend/phobos 2.059.
Is there any chance of seeing 2.060 merged in? One of the main reasons for
building from source was to gain certain bugfixes and improved functionality
(including code that I wrot
14 matches
Mail list logo
