== Quote from Brendan Simon (eTRIX) (brendan.si...@etrix.com.au)'s article
> On 19/04/2011 5:00 AM, d.gnu-requ...@puremagic.com wrote:
> > From: Daniel Green
> > On 4/18/2011 5:15 AM, Kagamin wrote:
> >> > Such feature would be fantastic.
> > I don't see this becoming a feature of D for quite some
On 19/04/2011 5:00 AM, d.gnu-requ...@puremagic.com wrote:
From: Daniel Green
On 4/18/2011 5:15 AM, Kagamin wrote:
> Such feature would be fantastic.
I don't see this becoming a feature of D for quite some time if ever
although it would make the enforcement easier.
Once the subsets are defined
== Quote from Daniel Green (ven...@gmail.com)'s article
> On 4/18/2011 5:15 AM, Kagamin wrote:
> > Such feature would be fantastic.
> I don't see this becoming a feature of D for quite some time if ever
> although it would make the enforcement easier.
> Once the subsets are defined the next challen
On 4/18/2011 5:15 AM, Kagamin wrote:
Such feature would be fantastic.
I don't see this becoming a feature of D for quite some time if ever
although it would make the enforcement easier.
Once the subsets are defined the next challenge is enforcing them. Two
ideas come to me right now. Enforcin
Daniel Green Wrote:
> The Windows driver module, possibly others I'm just familiar with that
> one, may be a good way to think of the problem. Essentially one has
> layers that would give access to an increasing subset of D until you
> reach the full capabilities offered.
>
> bare-metal : D s
On 4/16/2011 9:21 PM, Brendan Simon (eTRIX) wrote:
I believe that eCos is written in C++ (or a restricted subset), and I
presume that it performs quite well, so given that, I see no reason why
a D based OS/RTOS could not perform as well as eCos or other OSes.
Squeak is a good example of that too
On 15/04/2011 5:00 AM, d.gnu-requ...@puremagic.com wrote:
> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 23:30:24 + (UTC)
> From: Iain Buclaw
>
> == Quote from Brendan Simon (eTRIX) (brendan.si...@etrix.com.au)'s article
>> > >> > Can D be used in low-level drivers for Linux or other RTOS
>> (e.g. freertos)
>>> > >
== Quote from Iain Buclaw (ibuc...@ubuntu.com)'s article
> == Quote from Brendan Simon (eTRIX) (brendan.si...@etrix.com.au)'s article
> > On 14/04/11 5:00 AM, d.gnu-requ...@puremagic.com wrote:
> > > Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:12:13 + (UTC) From: Iain Buclaw
> > > == Quote from Brendan Simon (e
== Quote from Brendan Simon (eTRIX) (brendan.si...@etrix.com.au)'s article
> On 14/04/11 5:00 AM, d.gnu-requ...@puremagic.com wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:12:13 + (UTC) From: Iain Buclaw
> > == Quote from Brendan Simon (eTRIX)
> > (brendan.si...@etrix.com.au)'s article
> >> > Can D be
On 14/04/11 5:00 AM, d.gnu-requ...@puremagic.com wrote:
> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:12:13 + (UTC) From: Iain Buclaw
> == Quote from Brendan Simon (eTRIX)
> (brendan.si...@etrix.com.au)'s article
>> > Can D be used in low-level drivers for Linux or other RTOS (e.g.
>> > freertos) ??
> D is not
Hi Brendan,
For reference purposes, repeating what I've already said before elsewhere.
== Quote from Brendan Simon (eTRIX) (brendan.si...@etrix.com.au)'s article
> Can GDC (or DMD) be built as a cross compiler ?? e.g. targeting ARM or
> MIPS or PowerPC, etc ?? I'm presuming this should be no prob
On 2011-04-13 02:59, Brendan Simon (eTRIX) wrote:
Can GDC (or DMD) be built as a cross compiler ?? e.g. targeting ARM or
MIPS or PowerPC, etc ?? I'm presuming this should be no problem for GCC ??
Theoretically there shouldn't be a problem for GDC or LDC (D frontend
with LLVM backend) to genera
Can GDC (or DMD) be built as a cross compiler ?? e.g. targeting ARM or
MIPS or PowerPC, etc ?? I'm presuming this should be no problem for GCC ??
My development/host platforms are OS X and Debian Linux. Are there any
prebuilt binaries for such cross-compilers ??
BTW, does GDC generate C++ code f
13 matches
Mail list logo
